From patchwork Sun May 19 21:06:18 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Salil Mehta X-Patchwork-Id: 13667941 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9206C25B77 for ; Sun, 19 May 2024 21:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s8nn4-0006vy-MR; Sun, 19 May 2024 17:09:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s8nn2-0006rM-P8; Sun, 19 May 2024 17:09:56 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s8nn1-0000Cq-1v; Sun, 19 May 2024 17:09:56 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VjCxG69TCz6K8y0; Mon, 20 May 2024 05:09:06 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.213]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBD1A140736; Mon, 20 May 2024 05:09:52 +0800 (CST) Received: from 00293818-MRGF.china.huawei.com (10.126.174.235) by lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Sun, 19 May 2024 22:09:32 +0100 To: , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Shaoqin Huang Subject: [PATCH V9 6/8] physmem: Add helper function to destroy CPU AddressSpace Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 22:06:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20240519210620.228342-7-salil.mehta@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240519210620.228342-1-salil.mehta@huawei.com> References: <20240519210620.228342-1-salil.mehta@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.126.174.235] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.176.79.56; envelope-from=salil.mehta@huawei.com; helo=frasgout.his.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Salil Mehta X-Patchwork-Original-From: Salil Mehta via From: Salil Mehta Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Virtual CPU Hot-unplug leads to unrealization of a CPU object. This also involves destruction of the CPU AddressSpace. Add common function to help destroy the CPU AddressSpace. Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan Tested-by: Xianglai Li Tested-by: Miguel Luis Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang --- include/exec/cpu-common.h | 8 ++++++++ include/hw/core/cpu.h | 1 + system/physmem.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/exec/cpu-common.h b/include/exec/cpu-common.h index 815342d043..240ee04369 100644 --- a/include/exec/cpu-common.h +++ b/include/exec/cpu-common.h @@ -129,6 +129,14 @@ size_t qemu_ram_pagesize_largest(void); */ void cpu_address_space_init(CPUState *cpu, int asidx, const char *prefix, MemoryRegion *mr); +/** + * cpu_address_space_destroy: + * @cpu: CPU for which address space needs to be destroyed + * @asidx: integer index of this address space + * + * Note that with KVM only one address space is supported. + */ +void cpu_address_space_destroy(CPUState *cpu, int asidx); void cpu_physical_memory_rw(hwaddr addr, void *buf, hwaddr len, bool is_write); diff --git a/include/hw/core/cpu.h b/include/hw/core/cpu.h index bb398e8237..60b160d0b4 100644 --- a/include/hw/core/cpu.h +++ b/include/hw/core/cpu.h @@ -486,6 +486,7 @@ struct CPUState { QSIMPLEQ_HEAD(, qemu_work_item) work_list; struct CPUAddressSpace *cpu_ases; + int cpu_ases_count; int num_ases; AddressSpace *as; MemoryRegion *memory; diff --git a/system/physmem.c b/system/physmem.c index 342b7a8fd4..146f17826a 100644 --- a/system/physmem.c +++ b/system/physmem.c @@ -763,6 +763,7 @@ void cpu_address_space_init(CPUState *cpu, int asidx, if (!cpu->cpu_ases) { cpu->cpu_ases = g_new0(CPUAddressSpace, cpu->num_ases); + cpu->cpu_ases_count = cpu->num_ases; } newas = &cpu->cpu_ases[asidx]; @@ -776,6 +777,34 @@ void cpu_address_space_init(CPUState *cpu, int asidx, } } +void cpu_address_space_destroy(CPUState *cpu, int asidx) +{ + CPUAddressSpace *cpuas; + + assert(cpu->cpu_ases); + assert(asidx >= 0 && asidx < cpu->num_ases); + /* KVM cannot currently support multiple address spaces. */ + assert(asidx == 0 || !kvm_enabled()); + + cpuas = &cpu->cpu_ases[asidx]; + if (tcg_enabled()) { + memory_listener_unregister(&cpuas->tcg_as_listener); + } + + address_space_destroy(cpuas->as); + g_free_rcu(cpuas->as, rcu); + + if (asidx == 0) { + /* reset the convenience alias for address space 0 */ + cpu->as = NULL; + } + + if (--cpu->cpu_ases_count == 0) { + g_free(cpu->cpu_ases); + cpu->cpu_ases = NULL; + } +} + AddressSpace *cpu_get_address_space(CPUState *cpu, int asidx) { /* Return the AddressSpace corresponding to the specified index */