From patchwork Wed May 22 04:39:56 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Duan, Zhenzhong" X-Patchwork-Id: 13670408 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B4FDC25B78 for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 04:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s9doN-0001MW-Me; Wed, 22 May 2024 00:42:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s9doL-0001Lg-Hs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2024 00:42:45 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([192.198.163.10]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s9doG-0005sV-9j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 May 2024 00:42:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1716352961; x=1747888961; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WpBcaH1Tlocd9yPnXxPOtRYWcAqT14hB+2SW2lvL9mk=; b=MQ9JK5FiidKYOzDguouLu2xFK/laYU0Kamrjz+Ka3lhxJ0DbGj62tP42 I7D78u7L39PA6KBflcUoKcHF0mXb3qQJ1JrxjfsaaAsKDjxM9SBLBN7Yw 3RNwwYBlBIvw4flu9dVuUQaNTIrW85uwm8Fzp788So5iu9TJjlSTVPPKZ iL4h6abI3cSFDXvN2SRu9MoBeoE+P8kwwBHwi6w/qXLuubX+k2vxW5Ryx kh2Sx1ZL0kWvVGJJUvL05bJC04ao5MJxKuqpfdW8Y2bU0l/DCehgqB06V yTQTCN/jl2lLAyiLRGhUOl7EieJNBgwwi2gfGzD/2nA96gKaajcQUiCeZ w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: kH4UBvrVT0O0Ke4knxrlVA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gn343C2LRKSFyqV9XZM8hA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11079"; a="23994113" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,179,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="23994113" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2024 21:42:37 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 4FMcqQU0T16SMKwDNrGSlg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: B/RtREqcQpyyd+CL6+yzUg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,179,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="33683609" Received: from unknown (HELO SPR-S2600BT.bj.intel.com) ([10.240.192.124]) by orviesa008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2024 21:42:35 -0700 From: Zhenzhong Duan To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, clg@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, chao.p.peng@intel.com, Zhenzhong Duan , Gerd Hoffmann Subject: [PATCH v2 01/20] vfio/display: Fix error path in call site of ramfb_setup() Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 12:39:56 +0800 Message-Id: <20240522044015.412951-2-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240522044015.412951-1-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> References: <20240522044015.412951-1-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=192.198.163.10; envelope-from=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org vfio_display_dmabuf_init() and vfio_display_region_init() calls ramfb_setup() without checking its return value. So we may run into a situation that vfio_display_probe() succeed but errp is set. This is risky and may lead to assert failure in error_setv(). Cc: Gerd Hoffmann Fixes: b290659fc3d ("hw/vfio/display: add ramfb support") Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater --- hw/vfio/display.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/vfio/display.c b/hw/vfio/display.c index fe624a6c9b..d28b724102 100644 --- a/hw/vfio/display.c +++ b/hw/vfio/display.c @@ -361,6 +361,9 @@ static int vfio_display_dmabuf_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) vdev); if (vdev->enable_ramfb) { vdev->dpy->ramfb = ramfb_setup(errp); + if (!vdev->dpy->ramfb) { + return -EINVAL; + } } vfio_display_edid_init(vdev); return 0; @@ -488,6 +491,9 @@ static int vfio_display_region_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) vdev); if (vdev->enable_ramfb) { vdev->dpy->ramfb = ramfb_setup(errp); + if (!vdev->dpy->ramfb) { + return -EINVAL; + } } return 0; }