From patchwork Tue Aug 13 11:34:22 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: LIU Zhiwei X-Patchwork-Id: 13761841 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4928CC52D7B for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 11:36:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sdpoY-0002kh-H5; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 07:35:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sdpoW-0002jf-GF; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 07:35:44 -0400 Received: from out30-98.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.98]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sdpoU-0002UW-Et; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 07:35:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1723548937; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; bh=/d1sDtis43VunngbSIzdip5vT8h3Xv64FIWtRrW2dj4=; b=adF6NbmFAd4RNUAsFGYPTUyORpZGuO6AwAVYouMz2H1eGmGv2j7mkTSEPrEuwU8ec5D7aIKilomObp3SF/CgEv57XfZcx5JLOhw9yWBaPHWxqM2FVmdGbKMG3ryX6UFbWC2m9znsxVEdXGiRyAKD72Wxap5C2GuGGG2j7+lhQxE= Received: from L-PF1D6DP4-1208.hz.ali.com(mailfrom:zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0WCoya3q_1723548935) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 19:35:36 +0800 From: LIU Zhiwei To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, alistair.francis@wdc.com, dbarboza@ventanamicro.com, liwei1518@gmail.com, bmeng.cn@gmail.com, zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, TANG Tiancheng Subject: [PATCH v1 01/15] util: Add RISC-V vector extension probe in cpuinfo Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 19:34:22 +0800 Message-Id: <20240813113436.831-2-zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20240813113436.831-1-zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20240813113436.831-1-zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=115.124.30.98; envelope-from=zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com; helo=out30-98.freemail.mail.aliyun.com X-Spam_score_int: -174 X-Spam_score: -17.5 X-Spam_bar: ----------------- X-Spam_report: (-17.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org From: TANG Tiancheng Add support for probing RISC-V vector extension availability in the backend. This information will be used when deciding whether to use vector instructions in code generation. While the compiler doesn't support RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZVE64X, we use RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_V instead. Signed-off-by: TANG Tiancheng Reviewed-by: Liu Zhiwei --- host/include/riscv/host/cpuinfo.h | 1 + util/cpuinfo-riscv.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/host/include/riscv/host/cpuinfo.h b/host/include/riscv/host/cpuinfo.h index 2b00660e36..bf6ae51f72 100644 --- a/host/include/riscv/host/cpuinfo.h +++ b/host/include/riscv/host/cpuinfo.h @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #define CPUINFO_ZBA (1u << 1) #define CPUINFO_ZBB (1u << 2) #define CPUINFO_ZICOND (1u << 3) +#define CPUINFO_ZVE64X (1u << 4) /* Initialized with a constructor. */ extern unsigned cpuinfo; diff --git a/util/cpuinfo-riscv.c b/util/cpuinfo-riscv.c index 497ce12680..551821edef 100644 --- a/util/cpuinfo-riscv.c +++ b/util/cpuinfo-riscv.c @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static void sigill_handler(int signo, siginfo_t *si, void *data) /* Called both as constructor and (possibly) via other constructors. */ unsigned __attribute__((constructor)) cpuinfo_init(void) { - unsigned left = CPUINFO_ZBA | CPUINFO_ZBB | CPUINFO_ZICOND; + unsigned left = CPUINFO_ZBA | CPUINFO_ZBB | CPUINFO_ZICOND | CPUINFO_ZVE64X; unsigned info = cpuinfo; if (info) { @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ unsigned __attribute__((constructor)) cpuinfo_init(void) #endif #if defined(__riscv_arch_test) && defined(__riscv_zicond) info |= CPUINFO_ZICOND; +#endif +#if defined(__riscv_arch_test) && defined(__riscv_zve64x) + info |= CPUINFO_ZVE64X; #endif left &= ~info; @@ -64,7 +67,8 @@ unsigned __attribute__((constructor)) cpuinfo_init(void) && pair.key >= 0) { info |= pair.value & RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA ? CPUINFO_ZBA : 0; info |= pair.value & RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB ? CPUINFO_ZBB : 0; - left &= ~(CPUINFO_ZBA | CPUINFO_ZBB); + info |= pair.value & RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_V ? CPUINFO_ZVE64X : 0; + left &= ~(CPUINFO_ZBA | CPUINFO_ZBB | CPUINFO_ZVE64X); #ifdef RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICOND info |= pair.value & RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICOND ? CPUINFO_ZICOND : 0; left &= ~CPUINFO_ZICOND; @@ -108,6 +112,18 @@ unsigned __attribute__((constructor)) cpuinfo_init(void) left &= ~CPUINFO_ZICOND; } + if (left & CPUINFO_ZVE64X) { + /* Probe for Vector: vsetivli t0,1,e64,m1,ta,ma */ + unsigned vl; + got_sigill = 0; + + asm volatile( + "vsetivli %0, 1, e64, m1, ta, ma\n\t" + : "=r"(vl) : : "vl" + ); + info |= (got_sigill || vl != 1) ? 0 : CPUINFO_ZVE64X; + } + sigaction(SIGILL, &sa_old, NULL); assert(left == 0); }