From patchwork Thu Sep 12 13:38:27 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alireza Sanaee X-Patchwork-Id: 13802180 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3BE7EED609 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sok3h-00079I-0l; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:40:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sok3b-0006jq-Gs; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:40:23 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sok3a-0000Kw-50; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:40:23 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4X4JNK4Qllz6K6RP; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:35:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500003.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.28]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C5031400C9; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:40:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from a2303103017.china.huawei.com (10.48.147.42) by frapeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:40:19 +0200 To: , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH 3/5] target/arm/tcg: increase cache level for cpu=max Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:38:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20240912133829.400-4-alireza.sanaee@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240912133829.400-1-alireza.sanaee@huawei.com> References: <20240912133829.400-1-alireza.sanaee@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.48.147.42] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100003.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.210) To frapeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.28) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.176.79.56; envelope-from=alireza.sanaee@huawei.com; helo=frasgout.his.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Alireza Sanaee X-Patchwork-Original-From: Alireza Sanaee via From: Alireza Sanaee Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org This patch addresses cache description in the `aarch64_max_tcg_initfn` function for cpu=max. It introduces three layers of caches and modifies the cache description registers accordingly. Signed-off-by: Alireza Sanaee --- target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c b/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c index 904a7e90b4..47d8c9c9ae 100644 --- a/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c +++ b/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c @@ -1086,6 +1086,19 @@ void aarch64_max_tcg_initfn(Object *obj) uint64_t t; uint32_t u; + /* + * Expanded cache set + */ + cpu->clidr = 0x8200123; /* 4 4 3 in 3 bit fields */ + /* 64KB L1 dcache */ + cpu->ccsidr[0] = make_ccsidr(CCSIDR_FORMAT_LEGACY, 4, 64, 64 * KiB, 7); + /* 64KB L1 icache */ + cpu->ccsidr[1] = make_ccsidr(CCSIDR_FORMAT_LEGACY, 4, 64, 64 * KiB, 2); + /* 1MB L2 unified cache */ + cpu->ccsidr[2] = make_ccsidr(CCSIDR_FORMAT_LEGACY, 8, 64, 1 * MiB, 7); + /* 2MB L3 unified cache */ + cpu->ccsidr[4] = make_ccsidr(CCSIDR_FORMAT_LEGACY, 8, 64, 2 * MiB, 7); + /* * Unset ARM_FEATURE_BACKCOMPAT_CNTFRQ, which we would otherwise default * to because we started with aarch64_a57_initfn(). A 'max' CPU might