From patchwork Tue Oct 22 13:51:46 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zhao Liu X-Patchwork-Id: 13845698 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15CE1D2C550 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 13:37:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t3F3s-0005wt-W3; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:36:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t3F3r-0005v5-B7; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:36:35 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.10]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t3F3p-0000Dy-Iy; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:36:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1729604193; x=1761140193; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=v5TiGfpxtPYi3dX2SWWuKk9xXE8fMz5ejTsMCeSkh9w=; b=l0vxAzCZXLLxOWfFp7GMu0ocF2J1S2wpn6NZKOQVmVOztzC8jR8mosJE q/cMJUoQIITV5sJMrbk7eXmfMlP9wJ+3IU8pewBrg6IAq9vQa0v7FTdWh AU9/jDRDbVXjyAAooqcSGuBUlOutn5ZPsqGnciD4GqXFBRFNgIFxr1pZe SejVCr4efhl4ElDsOBpNyfMoM69anY6I6gTSI/h1oCRyRp6FKYWzvg+Tk AsDXa9+3IYYqSe/S3NyPVzMyHNIZCqSNxcXEiQKsp3hl/EmdABEg6qach TZI0hAPaZqR7q3iLkDI0UZzk3CeV95F/xLbCkiYXQWaLM32sgLoWNooBa g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: aLi2xKP2T4mI2msCy1M7GQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 5DX9TALoTcuPLRtqGUL9UQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11222"; a="46603682" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,199,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="46603682" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Oct 2024 06:36:28 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: bbz1toxaTLeTW4jo0tZrGw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: kKpqBDGMQhmbIvVHDl74SQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,223,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="79782373" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com ([10.239.160.36]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Oct 2024 06:36:23 -0700 From: Zhao Liu To: =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P_=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= , Igor Mammedov , Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-D?= =?utf-8?q?aud=C3=A9?= , Yanan Wang , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson , Eric Blake , Markus Armbruster , Marcelo Tosatti , =?utf-8?q?Alex_Benn=C3=A9e?= , Peter Maydell , Jonathan Cameron , Sia Jee Heng , Alireza Sanaee Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Zhenyu Wang , Dapeng Mi , Zhao Liu , Yongwei Ma Subject: [PATCH v4 4/9] hw/core: Check smp cache topology support for machine Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 21:51:46 +0800 Message-Id: <20241022135151.2052198-5-zhao1.liu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20241022135151.2052198-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com> References: <20241022135151.2052198-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.175.65.10; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -48 X-Spam_score: -4.9 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.519, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Add cache_supported flags in SMPCompatProps to allow machines to configure various caches support. And check the compatibility of the cache properties with the machine support in machine_parse_smp_cache(). Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu Tested-by: Yongwei Ma Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron --- Changes since Patch v3: * Dropped cache level check because if some fields is marked as default, then we can't guarentee the hierarchies are correct. (Daniel) --- hw/core/machine-smp.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/hw/boards.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/core/machine-smp.c b/hw/core/machine-smp.c index c6d90cd6d413..ebb7a134a7be 100644 --- a/hw/core/machine-smp.c +++ b/hw/core/machine-smp.c @@ -261,10 +261,32 @@ void machine_parse_smp_config(MachineState *ms, } } +static bool machine_check_topo_support(MachineState *ms, + CpuTopologyLevel topo, + Error **errp) +{ + MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms); + + if ((topo == CPU_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_MODULE && !mc->smp_props.modules_supported) || + (topo == CPU_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_CLUSTER && !mc->smp_props.clusters_supported) || + (topo == CPU_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_DIE && !mc->smp_props.dies_supported) || + (topo == CPU_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_BOOK && !mc->smp_props.books_supported) || + (topo == CPU_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_DRAWER && !mc->smp_props.drawers_supported)) { + error_setg(errp, + "Invalid topology level: %s. " + "The topology level is not supported by this machine", + CpuTopologyLevel_str(topo)); + return false; + } + + return true; +} + bool machine_parse_smp_cache(MachineState *ms, const SmpCachePropertiesList *caches, Error **errp) { + MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms); const SmpCachePropertiesList *node; DECLARE_BITMAP(caches_bitmap, CACHE_LEVEL_AND_TYPE__MAX); @@ -283,6 +305,25 @@ bool machine_parse_smp_cache(MachineState *ms, set_bit(node->value->cache, caches_bitmap); } + for (int i = 0; i < CACHE_LEVEL_AND_TYPE__MAX; i++) { + const SmpCacheProperties *props = &ms->smp_cache.props[i]; + + /* + * Reject non "default" topology level if the cache isn't + * supported by the machine. + */ + if (props->topology != CPU_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_DEFAULT && + !mc->smp_props.cache_supported[props->cache]) { + error_setg(errp, + "%s cache topology not supported by this machine", + CacheLevelAndType_str(node->value->cache)); + return false; + } + + if (!machine_check_topo_support(ms, props->topology, errp)) { + return false; + } + } return true; } diff --git a/include/hw/boards.h b/include/hw/boards.h index f7591d54a3d3..3d6cb5acd6c7 100644 --- a/include/hw/boards.h +++ b/include/hw/boards.h @@ -153,6 +153,8 @@ typedef struct { * @books_supported - whether books are supported by the machine * @drawers_supported - whether drawers are supported by the machine * @modules_supported - whether modules are supported by the machine + * @cache_supported - whether cache (l1d, l1i, l2 and l3) configuration are + * supported by the machine */ typedef struct { bool prefer_sockets; @@ -162,6 +164,7 @@ typedef struct { bool books_supported; bool drawers_supported; bool modules_supported; + bool cache_supported[CACHE_LEVEL_AND_TYPE__MAX]; } SMPCompatProps; /**