Message ID | 20250223145407.259924-4-r.peniaev@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | ui/console-vc: various fixes and improvements | expand |
diff --git a/ui/console-vc.c b/ui/console-vc.c index d512f57e10a9..87f57f1c52c6 100644 --- a/ui/console-vc.c +++ b/ui/console-vc.c @@ -827,8 +827,7 @@ static void vc_putchar(VCChardev *vc, int ch) case 6: /* report cursor position */ response = g_strdup_printf("\033[%d;%dR", - (s->y_base + s->y) % s->total_height + 1, - s->x + 1); + s->y + 1, s->x + 1); vc_respond_str(vc, response); break; }
The format of the CSI cursor position report is `ESC[row;columnR`, where `row` is a row of a cursor in the screen, not in the scrollback buffer. What's the difference? Let's say the terminal screen has 24 lines, no matter how long the scrollback buffer may be, the last line is the 24th. For example the following command can be executed in xterm on the last screen line: $ echo -en '\e[6n'; IFS='[;' read -sdR _ row col; echo $row:$col 24:1 It shows the cursor position on the current screen and not relative to the backscroll buffer. Before this change the row number was always increasing for the QEMU VC and represents the cursor position relative to the backscroll buffer. Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <r.peniaev@gmail.com> Cc: "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org --- ui/console-vc.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)