From patchwork Tue Feb 25 20:04:20 2025 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= X-Patchwork-Id: 13990676 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B919C021B8 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tn1Ab-0005Zc-Es; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:04:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tn1AZ-0005ZG-Ey for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:04:43 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tn1AX-00042W-QI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:04:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1740513880; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6/tsqTCLvYLjGViWEIjEmON2Q5fWig/xvrp6/qFGRhA=; b=MIVhGCbYIsDFvCaBwkBmIqLRulsDDu163KdRsgZtGZFX9UbCUmlS7bGnMZBFSDdlgYttnh IdgeP8fbhv7jUa5eIZ/pwTGVFLy+hYGQkNnr+jiUKQ12kF+byAYuAMNwWWQC7qjDoCLOfA vJDPzK2kmFh7LPp3Xz4Qct/3OoJ94LU= Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-245-c1bTPcPVNJOyNFvnFGRGjg-1; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:04:35 -0500 X-MC-Unique: c1bTPcPVNJOyNFvnFGRGjg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: c1bTPcPVNJOyNFvnFGRGjg_1740513874 Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C61691800873; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from toolbx.redhat.com (unknown [10.42.28.59]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610811800357; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:04:29 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Zhao Liu , Yanan Wang , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= Subject: [PATCH 1/4] include/hw/boards: cope with dev/rc versions in deprecation checks Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:04:20 +0000 Message-ID: <20250225200423.2350471-2-berrange@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20250225200423.2350471-1-berrange@redhat.com> References: <20250225200423.2350471-1-berrange@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -24 X-Spam_score: -2.5 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.443, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org When VERSION is set to a development snapshot (micro >= 50), or a release candidate (micro >= 90) we have an off-by-1 in determining deprecation and deletion thresholds for versioned machine types. In such cases we need to use the next major/minor version in threshold checks. This adapts the deprecation macros to do "next version" prediction when seeing a dev/rc version number. This ensures users of release candidates get an accurate view of machines that will be deprecated/deleted in the final release. This requires hardcoding our current release policy of 3 releases per year, with a major bump at the start of each year, and that dev/rc versions have micro >= 50. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé --- include/hw/boards.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/hw/boards.h b/include/hw/boards.h index 9360d1ce39..dcfb251cbd 100644 --- a/include/hw/boards.h +++ b/include/hw/boards.h @@ -647,11 +647,42 @@ struct MachineState { " years old are subject to deletion after " \ stringify(MACHINE_VER_DELETION_MAJOR) " years" -#define _MACHINE_VER_IS_EXPIRED_IMPL(cutoff, major, minor) \ +#define _MACHINE_VER_IS_CURRENT_EXPIRED(cutoff, major, minor) \ (((QEMU_VERSION_MAJOR - major) > cutoff) || \ (((QEMU_VERSION_MAJOR - major) == cutoff) && \ (QEMU_VERSION_MINOR - minor) >= 0)) +#define _MACHINE_VER_IS_NEXT_MINOR_EXPIRED(cutoff, major, minor) \ + (((QEMU_VERSION_MAJOR - major) > cutoff) || \ + (((QEMU_VERSION_MAJOR - major) == cutoff) && \ + ((QEMU_VERSION_MINOR + 1) - minor) >= 0)) + +#define _MACHINE_VER_IS_NEXT_MAJOR_EXPIRED(cutoff, major, minor) \ + ((((QEMU_VERSION_MAJOR + 1) - major) > cutoff) || \ + ((((QEMU_VERSION_MAJOR + 1) - major) == cutoff) && \ + (0 - minor) >= 0)) + +/* + * - The first check applies to formal releases + * - The second check applies to dev snapshots / release candidates + * where the next major version is the same. + * e.g. 9.0.50, 9.1.50, 9.0.90, 9.1.90 + * - The third check applies to dev snapshots / release candidates + * where the next major version will change. + * e.g. 9.2.50, 9.2.90 + * + * NB: this assumes we do 3 minor releases per year, before bumping major, + * and dev snapshots / release candidates are numbered with micro >= 50 + * If this ever changes the logic below will need modifying.... + */ +#define _MACHINE_VER_IS_EXPIRED_IMPL(cutoff, major, minor) \ + ((QEMU_VERSION_MICRO < 50 && \ + _MACHINE_VER_IS_CURRENT_EXPIRED(cutoff, major, minor)) || \ + (QEMU_VERSION_MICRO >= 50 && QEMU_VERSION_MINOR < 2 && \ + _MACHINE_VER_IS_NEXT_MINOR_EXPIRED(cutoff, major, minor)) || \ + (QEMU_VERSION_MICRO >= 50 && QEMU_VERSION_MINOR == 2 && \ + _MACHINE_VER_IS_NEXT_MAJOR_EXPIRED(cutoff, major, minor))) + #define _MACHINE_VER_IS_EXPIRED2(cutoff, major, minor) \ _MACHINE_VER_IS_EXPIRED_IMPL(cutoff, major, minor) #define _MACHINE_VER_IS_EXPIRED3(cutoff, major, minor, micro) \