From patchwork Sat May 11 01:46:19 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: BALATON Zoltan X-Patchwork-Id: 13662180 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C2F0C25B75 for ; Sat, 11 May 2024 01:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s5bpl-0007lb-1u; Fri, 10 May 2024 21:47:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s5bp0-0005Fw-Qe; Fri, 10 May 2024 21:46:49 -0400 Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu ([152.66.115.2]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s5boz-0003fR-Bs; Fri, 10 May 2024 21:46:46 -0400 Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zero.eik.bme.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8034E6789; Sat, 11 May 2024 03:46:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at eik.bme.hu Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by zero.eik.bme.hu (zero.eik.bme.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10028) with ESMTP id WydPFYEfMk3k; Sat, 11 May 2024 03:46:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by zero.eik.bme.hu (Postfix, from userid 432) id F1F814E6784; Sat, 11 May 2024 03:46:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <94a0933bce3d78578cdd4b5f65d269676489f284.1715390232.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu> In-Reply-To: References: From: BALATON Zoltan Subject: [PATCH v6 39/48] target/ppc/mmu_common.c: Remove another single use local MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org Cc: Nicholas Piggin , Daniel Henrique Barboza Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 03:46:19 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=152.66.115.2; envelope-from=balaton@eik.bme.hu; helo=zero.eik.bme.hu X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org In ppc6xx_tlb_pte_check() the pteh variable is used only once to compare to the h parameter of the function. Inline its value and use pteh name for the function parameter which is more descriptive. Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan --- target/ppc/mmu_common.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c index b25c77c618..7026b6a62c 100644 --- a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c +++ b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c @@ -95,15 +95,14 @@ int ppc6xx_tlb_getnum(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong eaddr, } static int ppc6xx_tlb_pte_check(mmu_ctx_t *ctx, target_ulong pte0, - target_ulong pte1, int h, + target_ulong pte1, int pteh, MMUAccessType access_type) { - int ret, pteh, pp; + int ret, pp; ret = -1; /* Check validity and table match */ - pteh = (pte0 >> 6) & 1; - if (pte_is_valid(pte0) && h == pteh) { + if (pte_is_valid(pte0) && ((pte0 >> 6) & 1) == pteh) { /* Check vsid & api */ pp = pte1 & 0x00000003; if ((pte0 & PTE_PTEM_MASK) == ctx->ptem) {