@@ -838,6 +838,7 @@ int __init avc_add_callback(int (*callback)(u32 event), u32 events)
* @ssid,@tsid,@tclass : identifier of an AVC entry
* @seqno : sequence number when decision was made
* @xpd: extended_perms_decision to be added to the node
+ * @flags: the AVC_* flags, e.g. AVC_NONBLOCKING, AVC_EXTENDED_PERMS, or 0.
*
* if a valid AVC entry doesn't exist,this function returns -ENOENT.
* if kmalloc() called internal returns NULL, this function returns -ENOMEM.
@@ -856,6 +857,23 @@ static int avc_update_node(struct selinux_avc *avc,
struct hlist_head *head;
spinlock_t *lock;
+ /*
+ * If we are in a non-blocking code path, e.g. VFS RCU walk,
+ * then we must not add permissions to a cache entry
+ * because we cannot safely audit the denial. Otherwise,
+ * during the subsequent blocking retry (e.g. VFS ref walk), we
+ * will find the permissions already granted in the cache entry
+ * and won't audit anything at all, leading to silent denials in
+ * permissive mode that only appear when in enforcing mode.
+ *
+ * See the corresponding handling in slow_avc_audit(), and the
+ * logic in selinux_inode_follow_link and selinux_inode_permission
+ * for the VFS MAY_NOT_BLOCK flag, which is transliterated into
+ * AVC_NONBLOCKING for avc_has_perm_noaudit().
+ */
+ if (flags & AVC_NONBLOCKING)
+ return 0;
+
node = avc_alloc_node(avc);
if (!node) {
rc = -ENOMEM;
@@ -1115,7 +1133,7 @@ int avc_has_extended_perms(struct selinux_state *state,
* @tsid: target security identifier
* @tclass: target security class
* @requested: requested permissions, interpreted based on @tclass
- * @flags: AVC_STRICT or 0
+ * @flags: AVC_STRICT, AVC_NONBLOCKING, or 0
* @avd: access vector decisions
*
* Check the AVC to determine whether the @requested permissions are granted
@@ -1199,7 +1217,8 @@ int avc_has_perm_flags(struct selinux_state *state,
struct av_decision avd;
int rc, rc2;
- rc = avc_has_perm_noaudit(state, ssid, tsid, tclass, requested, 0,
+ rc = avc_has_perm_noaudit(state, ssid, tsid, tclass, requested,
+ (flags & MAY_NOT_BLOCK) ? AVC_NONBLOCKING : 0,
&avd);
rc2 = avc_audit(state, ssid, tsid, tclass, requested, &avd, rc,
@@ -3196,7 +3196,9 @@ static int selinux_inode_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
return PTR_ERR(isec);
rc = avc_has_perm_noaudit(&selinux_state,
- sid, isec->sid, isec->sclass, perms, 0, &avd);
+ sid, isec->sid, isec->sclass, perms,
+ (flags & MAY_NOT_BLOCK) ? AVC_NONBLOCKING : 0,
+ &avd);
audited = avc_audit_required(perms, &avd, rc,
from_access ? FILE__AUDIT_ACCESS : 0,
&denied);
@@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ static inline int avc_audit(struct selinux_state *state,
#define AVC_STRICT 1 /* Ignore permissive mode. */
#define AVC_EXTENDED_PERMS 2 /* update extended permissions */
+#define AVC_NONBLOCKING 4 /* non blocking */
int avc_has_perm_noaudit(struct selinux_state *state,
u32 ssid, u32 tsid,
u16 tclass, u32 requested,
commit 0dc1ba24f7fff6 ("SELINUX: Make selinux cache VFS RCU walks safe") results in no audit messages at all if in permissive mode because the cache is updated during the rcu walk and thus no denial occurs on the subsequent ref walk. Fix this by not updating the cache when performing a non-blocking permission check. This only affects search and symlink read checks during rcu walk. Fixes: 0dc1ba24f7fff6 ("SELINUX: Make selinux cache VFS RCU walks safe") Reported-by: BMK <bmktuwien@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> --- v2 moves the test of AVC_NONBLOCKING inside of avc_update_node(), adds a comment explaining the rationale, and updates some kerneldoc comments. I still have some doubts however about the naming (AVC_NONBLOCKING) since this isn't really about blocking AFAICT. security/selinux/avc.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-- security/selinux/hooks.c | 4 +++- security/selinux/include/avc.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)