mbox series

[0/2] spi: spidev{,_test}: Add support for Octal mode data transfers

Message ID 20200416101835.14573-1-geert+renesas@glider.be (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series spi: spidev{,_test}: Add support for Octal mode data transfers | expand

Message

Geert Uytterhoeven April 16, 2020, 10:18 a.m. UTC
Hi Mark,

This patch adds support for Octal mode data transfers to spidev and the
spidev_test tool.

Note that this was not tested with Octal-capable hardware.

Thanks for your comments!

Geert Uytterhoeven (2):
  spi: spidev: Add support for Octal mode data transfers
  spi: spidev_test: Add support for Octal mode data transfers

 drivers/spi/spidev.c    |  3 ++-
 tools/spi/spidev_test.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Mark Brown April 16, 2020, 3:44 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:18:33 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 	Hi Mark,
> 
> This patch adds support for Octal mode data transfers to spidev and the
> spidev_test tool.
> 
> Note that this was not tested with Octal-capable hardware.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/2] spi: spidev: Add support for Octal mode data transfers
      commit: 66ec7b3bc9c043518da828cd84aefe6242943a97
[2/2] spi: spidev_test: Add support for Octal mode data transfers
      commit: 896fa735084e4a9160f8f17d75d2899fb38a6215

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark