From patchwork Tue Apr 2 12:19:46 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Trent Piepho X-Patchwork-Id: 2377631 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-spi-devel-general@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork2.kernel.org Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.34.181.88]) by patchwork2.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420BBDF2A1 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 12:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UN0CA-0008BA-GX; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:20:10 +0000 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UN0C9-0008Az-R1 for spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:20:09 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.160.54 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.54; envelope-from=tpiepho@gmail.com; helo=mail-pb0-f54.google.com; Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com ([209.85.160.54]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1UN0C7-0005sp-ST for spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:20:09 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id xa7so213804pbc.13 for ; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 05:20:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.27.136 with SMTP id t8mr24311008pag.209.1364905202020; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 05:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (174-31-195-141.tukw.qwest.net. [174.31.195.141]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f4sm1596359pbc.6.2013.04.02.05.20.00 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Apr 2013 05:20:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Trent Piepho To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [PATCH V2 03/12] spi/mxs: Change flag arguments in txrx functions to bit flags Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 05:19:46 -0700 Message-Id: <1364905195-24286-3-git-send-email-tpiepho@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.10.4 In-Reply-To: <1364905195-24286-1-git-send-email-tpiepho@gmail.com> References: <1364905195-24286-1-git-send-email-tpiepho@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (tpiepho[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1UN0C7-0005sp-ST Cc: Marek Vasut , Fabio Estevam , Trent Piepho , Shawn Guo X-BeenThere: spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux SPI core/device drivers discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: spi-devel-general-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net There are three flag arguments to the PIO and DMA txrx functions. Two are passed as pointers to integers, even though they are input only and not modified, which makes no sense to do. The third is passed as an integer. The compiler must use an argument register or stack variable for each flag this way. By using bitflags in a single flag argument more efficient and smaller code is produced since all the flags can fit in a single register. And all the flag arguments get cumbersome, especially when more are added for things like GPIO chipselects. The "first" flag is never used, so can just be deleted. The "last" flag is renamed to DEASSERT_CS, since that's really what it does. The spi_transfer cs_change flag means that CS might be de-asserted on a transfer which is not last and not de-assert on the last transfer, so it is not which transfer is the last we need to know but rather the transfers which after which CS should be de-asserted. This also extends the driver to not ignore cs_change when setting the DEASSERT_CS nee "last" flag. Signed-off-by: Trent Piepho Cc: Marek Vasut Cc: Fabio Estevam Cc: Shawn Guo --- drivers/spi/spi-mxs.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mxs.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mxs.c index 7eb4bc9..3064304 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mxs.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mxs.c @@ -58,6 +58,13 @@ #define SG_MAXLEN 0xff00 +/* + * Flags for txrx functions. More efficient that using an argument register for + * each one. + */ +#define TXRX_WRITE 1 /* This is a write */ +#define TXRX_DEASSERT_CS 2 /* De-assert CS at end of txrx */ + struct mxs_spi { struct mxs_ssp ssp; struct completion c; @@ -196,7 +203,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mxs_ssp_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) static int mxs_spi_txrx_dma(struct mxs_spi *spi, int cs, unsigned char *buf, int len, - int *first, int *last, int write) + unsigned int flags) { struct mxs_ssp *ssp = &spi->ssp; struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc = NULL; @@ -226,15 +233,19 @@ static int mxs_spi_txrx_dma(struct mxs_spi *spi, int cs, ctrl0 &= ~BM_SSP_CTRL0_XFER_COUNT; ctrl0 |= BM_SSP_CTRL0_DATA_XFER | mxs_spi_cs_to_reg(cs); - if (!write) + if (!(flags & TXRX_WRITE)) ctrl0 |= BM_SSP_CTRL0_READ; /* Queue the DMA data transfer. */ for (sg_count = 0; sg_count < sgs; sg_count++) { + /* Prepare the transfer descriptor. */ min = min(len, desc_len); - /* Prepare the transfer descriptor. */ - if ((sg_count + 1 == sgs) && *last) + /* + * De-assert CS on last segment if flag is set (i.e., no more + * transfers will follow) + */ + if ((sg_count + 1 == sgs) && (flags & TXRX_DEASSERT_CS)) ctrl0 |= BM_SSP_CTRL0_IGNORE_CRC; if (ssp->devid == IMX23_SSP) { @@ -259,7 +270,7 @@ static int mxs_spi_txrx_dma(struct mxs_spi *spi, int cs, sg_init_one(&dma_xfer[sg_count].sg, sg_buf, min); ret = dma_map_sg(ssp->dev, &dma_xfer[sg_count].sg, 1, - write ? DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE); + (flags & TXRX_WRITE) ? DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE); len -= min; buf += min; @@ -279,7 +290,7 @@ static int mxs_spi_txrx_dma(struct mxs_spi *spi, int cs, desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(ssp->dmach, &dma_xfer[sg_count].sg, 1, - write ? DMA_MEM_TO_DEV : DMA_DEV_TO_MEM, + (flags & TXRX_WRITE) ? DMA_MEM_TO_DEV : DMA_DEV_TO_MEM, DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT | DMA_CTRL_ACK); if (!desc) { @@ -316,7 +327,7 @@ err_vmalloc: while (--sg_count >= 0) { err_mapped: dma_unmap_sg(ssp->dev, &dma_xfer[sg_count].sg, 1, - write ? DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE); + (flags & TXRX_WRITE) ? DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE); } kfree(dma_xfer); @@ -326,7 +337,7 @@ err_mapped: static int mxs_spi_txrx_pio(struct mxs_spi *spi, int cs, unsigned char *buf, int len, - int *first, int *last, int write) + unsigned int flags) { struct mxs_ssp *ssp = &spi->ssp; @@ -337,7 +348,7 @@ static int mxs_spi_txrx_pio(struct mxs_spi *spi, int cs, mxs_spi_set_cs(spi, cs); while (len--) { - if (*last && len == 0) + if (len == 0 && (flags & TXRX_DEASSERT_CS)) writel(BM_SSP_CTRL0_IGNORE_CRC, ssp->base + HW_SSP_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET); @@ -350,7 +361,7 @@ static int mxs_spi_txrx_pio(struct mxs_spi *spi, int cs, writel(1, ssp->base + HW_SSP_XFER_SIZE); } - if (write) + if (flags & TXRX_WRITE) writel(BM_SSP_CTRL0_READ, ssp->base + HW_SSP_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR); else @@ -363,13 +374,13 @@ static int mxs_spi_txrx_pio(struct mxs_spi *spi, int cs, if (mxs_ssp_wait(spi, HW_SSP_CTRL0, BM_SSP_CTRL0_RUN, 1)) return -ETIMEDOUT; - if (write) + if (flags & TXRX_WRITE) writel(*buf, ssp->base + HW_SSP_DATA(ssp)); writel(BM_SSP_CTRL0_DATA_XFER, ssp->base + HW_SSP_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET); - if (!write) { + if (!(flags & TXRX_WRITE)) { if (mxs_ssp_wait(spi, HW_SSP_STATUS(ssp), BM_SSP_STATUS_FIFO_EMPTY, 0)) return -ETIMEDOUT; @@ -394,13 +405,11 @@ static int mxs_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master, { struct mxs_spi *spi = spi_master_get_devdata(master); struct mxs_ssp *ssp = &spi->ssp; - int first, last; struct spi_transfer *t, *tmp_t; + unsigned int flag; int status = 0; int cs; - first = last = 0; - cs = m->spi->chip_select; list_for_each_entry_safe(t, tmp_t, &m->transfers, transfer_list) { @@ -409,10 +418,9 @@ static int mxs_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master, if (status) break; - if (&t->transfer_list == m->transfers.next) - first = 1; - if (&t->transfer_list == m->transfers.prev) - last = 1; + /* De-assert on last transfer, inverted by cs_change flag */ + flag = (&t->transfer_list == m->transfers.prev) ^ t->cs_change ? + TXRX_DEASSERT_CS : 0; if ((t->rx_buf && t->tx_buf) || (t->rx_dma && t->tx_dma)) { dev_err(ssp->dev, "Cannot send and receive simultaneously\n"); @@ -437,11 +445,11 @@ static int mxs_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master, if (t->tx_buf) status = mxs_spi_txrx_pio(spi, cs, (void *)t->tx_buf, - t->len, &first, &last, 1); + t->len, flag | TXRX_WRITE); if (t->rx_buf) status = mxs_spi_txrx_pio(spi, cs, t->rx_buf, t->len, - &first, &last, 0); + flag); } else { writel(BM_SSP_CTRL1_DMA_ENABLE, ssp->base + HW_SSP_CTRL1(ssp) + @@ -450,11 +458,11 @@ static int mxs_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master, if (t->tx_buf) status = mxs_spi_txrx_dma(spi, cs, (void *)t->tx_buf, t->len, - &first, &last, 1); + flag | TXRX_WRITE); if (t->rx_buf) status = mxs_spi_txrx_dma(spi, cs, t->rx_buf, t->len, - &first, &last, 0); + flag); } if (status) { @@ -463,7 +471,6 @@ static int mxs_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master, } m->actual_length += t->len; - first = last = 0; } m->status = status;