diff mbox

[v1] spi: loopback-test: provide loop request option.

Message ID 20170712134020.17927-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Oleksij Rempel July 12, 2017, 1:40 p.m. UTC
From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>

Provide a module parameter to request internal
loop by the SPI master controller.
This should make loop testing easier without extra HW modification.

Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

Comments

Oleksij Rempel July 13, 2017, 4:55 a.m. UTC | #1
On 12.07.2017 15:40, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
>
> Provide a module parameter to request internal
> loop by the SPI master controller.
> This should make loop testing easier without extra HW modification.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c b/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c
> index f4875f177df0..34e1544d7d0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,14 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(loopback,
>  		 "is checked to match tx_buf after the spi_message "	\
>  		 "is executed");
>
> +/* the device is jumpered for loopback - enabling some rx_buf tests */
> +int loop_req;
> +module_param(loop_req, int, 0);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(loop_req,
> +		 "if set enable controller will be asked to enable "	\

i need to correct this ^^^.

And wait if there any other comments :)

> +		 "test loop mode. If supported, MISO and MOSI will be "  \
> +		 "jumpered by SPI controller");
> +
>  /* run only a specific test */
>  int run_only_test = -1;
>  module_param(run_only_test, int, 0);
> @@ -313,6 +321,16 @@ static int spi_loopback_test_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>
> +	if (loop_req) {
> +		spi->mode = SPI_LOOP | spi->mode;
> +		ret = spi_setup(spi);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(&spi->dev, "SPI setup wasn't successful %d\n", ret);
> +			dev_err(&spi->dev, "SPI_LOOP is not supported by SPI master.");
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	dev_info(&spi->dev, "Executing spi-loopback-tests\n");
>
>  	ret = spi_test_run_tests(spi, spi_tests);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Uwe Kleine-König July 13, 2017, 7:42 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 03:40:20PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
> 
> Provide a module parameter to request internal
> loop by the SPI master controller.

> This should make loop testing easier without extra HW modification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c b/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c
> index f4875f177df0..34e1544d7d0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,14 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(loopback,
>  		 "is checked to match tx_buf after the spi_message "	\
>  		 "is executed");
>  
> +/* the device is jumpered for loopback - enabling some rx_buf tests */
> +int loop_req;
> +module_param(loop_req, int, 0);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(loop_req,
> +		 "if set enable controller will be asked to enable "	\
> +		 "test loop mode. If supported, MISO and MOSI will be "  \
> +		 "jumpered by SPI controller");
> +
>  /* run only a specific test */
>  int run_only_test = -1;
>  module_param(run_only_test, int, 0);
> @@ -313,6 +321,16 @@ static int spi_loopback_test_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (loop_req) {
> +		spi->mode = SPI_LOOP | spi->mode;
> +		ret = spi_setup(spi);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(&spi->dev, "SPI setup wasn't successful %d\n", ret);
> +			dev_err(&spi->dev, "SPI_LOOP is not supported by SPI master.");

Why two error messages here? What about:

	dev_err(&spi->dev, "SPI setup with SPI_LOOP failed (%d)\n", ret);

These lines are > 80 chars, so you should break them.

> +			return -ENODEV;

return ret?

Best regards
Uwe
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c b/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c
index f4875f177df0..34e1544d7d0e 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c
@@ -51,6 +51,14 @@  MODULE_PARM_DESC(loopback,
 		 "is checked to match tx_buf after the spi_message "	\
 		 "is executed");
 
+/* the device is jumpered for loopback - enabling some rx_buf tests */
+int loop_req;
+module_param(loop_req, int, 0);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(loop_req,
+		 "if set enable controller will be asked to enable "	\
+		 "test loop mode. If supported, MISO and MOSI will be "  \
+		 "jumpered by SPI controller");
+
 /* run only a specific test */
 int run_only_test = -1;
 module_param(run_only_test, int, 0);
@@ -313,6 +321,16 @@  static int spi_loopback_test_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
 {
 	int ret;
 
+	if (loop_req) {
+		spi->mode = SPI_LOOP | spi->mode;
+		ret = spi_setup(spi);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(&spi->dev, "SPI setup wasn't successful %d\n", ret);
+			dev_err(&spi->dev, "SPI_LOOP is not supported by SPI master.");
+			return -ENODEV;
+		}
+	}
+
 	dev_info(&spi->dev, "Executing spi-loopback-tests\n");
 
 	ret = spi_test_run_tests(spi, spi_tests);