diff mbox series

[1/2] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: support multiple cs for lpspi

Message ID 20221206225410.604482-1-han.xu@nxp.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 5f947746f0089529c85654704643f158b420ff92
Headers show
Series [1/2] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: support multiple cs for lpspi | expand

Commit Message

Han Xu Dec. 6, 2022, 10:54 p.m. UTC
support to get chip select number from DT file.

Signed-off-by: Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

Comments

Dhruva Gole Dec. 7, 2022, 6:38 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On 07/12/22 04:24, Han Xu wrote:
> support to get chip select number from DT file.

In my humble opinion, a  more elaborate commit message would help.
You can add perhaps which DT node is to be set, like you might want
to say,

support to get chip select number by Setting the value of num-cs in DT

or something on those lines.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com>
> ---
>   drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c | 5 +++++
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c
> index 6454b88c31fe..7f0562ed4d09 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ struct fsl_lpspi_data {
>   	struct clk *clk_ipg;
>   	struct clk *clk_per;
>   	bool is_slave;
> +	u32 num_cs;
>   	bool is_only_cs1;
>   	bool is_first_byte;
>   
> @@ -850,6 +851,9 @@ static int fsl_lpspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	fsl_lpspi->is_slave = is_slave;
>   	fsl_lpspi->is_only_cs1 = of_property_read_bool((&pdev->dev)->of_node,
>   						"fsl,spi-only-use-cs1-sel");
> +	if (of_property_read_u32((&pdev->dev)->of_node, "num-cs",
Running a checkpatch on this patch gave me the following,

CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around '&pdev->dev'
#36: FILE: drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c:854:
+       if (of_property_read_u32((&pdev->dev)->of_node, "num-cs",
+                                &fsl_lpspi->num_cs))

You might want to just do &pdev->dev->of_node instead

> +				 &fsl_lpspi->num_cs))
> +		fsl_lpspi->num_cs = 1;
I am not sure I understand why you are setting this to 1 here?
I am assuming it is because you want num_cs to default to 1 if
it is not specified in DT.

Please can you also add a dev_err and be sure to warn about this?

Also adding a comment or even a message inside dev err that you are
setting this to 1 if it fails to get from DT would be helpful.

>   
>   	controller->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(8, 32);
>   	controller->transfer_one = fsl_lpspi_transfer_one;
> @@ -859,6 +863,7 @@ static int fsl_lpspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	controller->flags = SPI_MASTER_MUST_RX | SPI_MASTER_MUST_TX;
>   	controller->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>   	controller->bus_num = pdev->id;
> +	controller->num_chipselect = fsl_lpspi->num_cs;
>   	controller->slave_abort = fsl_lpspi_slave_abort;
>   	if (!fsl_lpspi->is_slave)
>   		controller->use_gpio_descriptors = true;
Mark Brown Dec. 7, 2022, 1:44 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 12:08:43PM +0530, Dhruva Gole wrote:
> On 07/12/22 04:24, Han Xu wrote:
> > support to get chip select number from DT file.

> > +		fsl_lpspi->num_cs = 1;
> I am not sure I understand why you are setting this to 1 here?
> I am assuming it is because you want num_cs to default to 1 if
> it is not specified in DT.

> Please can you also add a dev_err and be sure to warn about this?

The binding says that this property is optional with a default of 1 so
it should be totally fine for a system to not specify anything.
Mark Brown Dec. 7, 2022, 4:21 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, 06 Dec 2022 16:54:09 -0600, Han Xu wrote:
> support to get chip select number from DT file.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: support multiple cs for lpspi
      commit: 5f947746f0089529c85654704643f158b420ff92
[2/2] dt-bindings: spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: add num-cs for lpspi
      commit: bc9ab1b7a6c687370b5d4edf34064bf04af8d369

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c
index 6454b88c31fe..7f0562ed4d09 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@  struct fsl_lpspi_data {
 	struct clk *clk_ipg;
 	struct clk *clk_per;
 	bool is_slave;
+	u32 num_cs;
 	bool is_only_cs1;
 	bool is_first_byte;
 
@@ -850,6 +851,9 @@  static int fsl_lpspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	fsl_lpspi->is_slave = is_slave;
 	fsl_lpspi->is_only_cs1 = of_property_read_bool((&pdev->dev)->of_node,
 						"fsl,spi-only-use-cs1-sel");
+	if (of_property_read_u32((&pdev->dev)->of_node, "num-cs",
+				 &fsl_lpspi->num_cs))
+		fsl_lpspi->num_cs = 1;
 
 	controller->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(8, 32);
 	controller->transfer_one = fsl_lpspi_transfer_one;
@@ -859,6 +863,7 @@  static int fsl_lpspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	controller->flags = SPI_MASTER_MUST_RX | SPI_MASTER_MUST_TX;
 	controller->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
 	controller->bus_num = pdev->id;
+	controller->num_chipselect = fsl_lpspi->num_cs;
 	controller->slave_abort = fsl_lpspi_slave_abort;
 	if (!fsl_lpspi->is_slave)
 		controller->use_gpio_descriptors = true;