@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static int fsl_lpspi_dma_transfer(struct spi_controller *controller,
{
struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc_tx, *desc_rx;
unsigned long transfer_timeout;
- unsigned long timeout;
+ unsigned long time_left;
struct sg_table *tx = &transfer->tx_sg, *rx = &transfer->rx_sg;
int ret;
@@ -594,9 +594,9 @@ static int fsl_lpspi_dma_transfer(struct spi_controller *controller,
transfer->len);
/* Wait eDMA to finish the data transfer.*/
- timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&fsl_lpspi->dma_tx_completion,
- transfer_timeout);
- if (!timeout) {
+ time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&fsl_lpspi->dma_tx_completion,
+ transfer_timeout);
+ if (!time_left) {
dev_err(fsl_lpspi->dev, "I/O Error in DMA TX\n");
dmaengine_terminate_all(controller->dma_tx);
dmaengine_terminate_all(controller->dma_rx);
@@ -604,9 +604,9 @@ static int fsl_lpspi_dma_transfer(struct spi_controller *controller,
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
- timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&fsl_lpspi->dma_rx_completion,
- transfer_timeout);
- if (!timeout) {
+ time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&fsl_lpspi->dma_rx_completion,
+ transfer_timeout);
+ if (!time_left) {
dev_err(fsl_lpspi->dev, "I/O Error in DMA RX\n");
dmaengine_terminate_all(controller->dma_tx);
dmaengine_terminate_all(controller->dma_rx);
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like: timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...) if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT; with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code self explaining. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> --- drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)