diff mbox

[v6,07/33] target: Use system workqueues for TMF

Message ID 20170215002612.14566-8-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show

Commit Message

Bart Van Assche Feb. 15, 2017, 12:25 a.m. UTC 
A quote from SAM-5: "The order in which task management requests
are processed is not specified by the SCSI architecture model.
The SCSI architecture model does not require in-order delivery of
such task management requests or processing by the task manager
in the order received. To guarantee the processing order of task
management requests referencing sent to a specific logical unit,
an application client should not have more than one such task
management request pending to that logical unit." This means that
it is safe to use the system workqueues instead of tmr_wq for
processing TMFs.

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
Cc: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
---
 drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
index efb9e6f38201..ba74f53ef09d 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
@@ -3150,7 +3150,7 @@  int transport_generic_handle_tmr(
 	}
 
 	INIT_WORK(&cmd->work, target_tmr_work);
-	queue_work(cmd->se_dev->tmr_wq, &cmd->work);
+	schedule_work(&cmd->work);
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(transport_generic_handle_tmr);