@@ -3346,7 +3346,7 @@ static void ibmvscsis_handle_crq(unsigned long data)
bool ack = true;
volatile u8 valid;
- spin_lock_bh(&vscsi->intr_lock);
+ spin_lock(&vscsi->intr_lock);
dev_dbg(&vscsi->dev, "got interrupt\n");
@@ -3360,7 +3360,7 @@ static void ibmvscsis_handle_crq(unsigned long data)
dev_dbg(&vscsi->dev, "handle_crq, don't process: flags 0x%x, state 0x%hx\n",
vscsi->flags, vscsi->state);
- spin_unlock_bh(&vscsi->intr_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&vscsi->intr_lock);
return;
}
@@ -3437,7 +3437,7 @@ static void ibmvscsis_handle_crq(unsigned long data)
(int)list_empty(&vscsi->schedule_q), vscsi->flags,
vscsi->state);
- spin_unlock_bh(&vscsi->intr_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&vscsi->intr_lock);
}
static int ibmvscsis_probe(struct vio_dev *vdev,
as you are already in a tasklet, it is unnecessary to call spin_lock_bh, because softirq already disable BH. Signed-off-by: Zhiwei Jiang <qq282012236@gmail.com> --- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)