Message ID | cover.1700724699.git.nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | use the macro ISOLATE_LSB where appropriate | expand |
On 23.11.2023 08:37, Nicola Vetrini wrote: > This series replaces two instances of the pattern (x & -x) with the > macro ISOLATE_LSB. > > Nicola Vetrini (2): > xen/vmap: use ISOLATE_LSB to wrap a violation of Rule 10.1 > xen/iommu: use ISOLATE_LSB to wrap a violation of Rule 10.1 > > xen/common/vmap.c | 2 +- > xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Just to mention it: This is an example of where tracking the various pieces of Misra work is artificially made difficult (see e.g. earlier respective remarks by Julien). Why wasn't this combined into a single series together with the 3-patch one sent the same minute? Jan
On 2023-11-23 09:19, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 23.11.2023 08:37, Nicola Vetrini wrote: >> This series replaces two instances of the pattern (x & -x) with the >> macro ISOLATE_LSB. >> >> Nicola Vetrini (2): >> xen/vmap: use ISOLATE_LSB to wrap a violation of Rule 10.1 >> xen/iommu: use ISOLATE_LSB to wrap a violation of Rule 10.1 >> >> xen/common/vmap.c | 2 +- >> xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Just to mention it: This is an example of where tracking the various > pieces > of Misra work is artificially made difficult (see e.g. earlier > respective > remarks by Julien). Why wasn't this combined into a single series > together > with the 3-patch one sent the same minute? > > Jan I didn't think of collapsing them