From patchwork Sun Jan 10 19:30:49 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Michael S. Tsirkin" X-Patchwork-Id: 7997711 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-xen-devel@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork2.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork2.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3C4BEEE5 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC1120375 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xen.org (lists.xenproject.org [50.57.142.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A823720374 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aILhg-0002pp-Tw; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:31:04 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aILhf-0002pF-AM for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:31:03 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211] by server-11.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 84/AC-24494-671B2965; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:31:02 +0000 X-Env-Sender: mst@redhat.com X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1452454260!14969386!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.132.183.28] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMjA5LjEzMi4xODMuMjggPT4gNTQwNjQ=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.35.1; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 50605 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2016 19:31:01 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by server-2.tower-206.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted SMTP; 10 Jan 2016 19:31:01 -0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20980AA7; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (vpn1-5-155.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.5.155]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id u0AJUncb021519; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:30:50 -0500 Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 21:30:49 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1452454200-8844-3-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <1452454200-8844-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1452454200-8844-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> X-Mutt-Fcc: =sent X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Russell King - ARM Linux , Arnd Bergmann , x86@kernel.org, Tony Lindgren , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Stefano Stabellini , Andrey Konovalov , adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andy Whitcroft , Thomas Gleixner , linux-metag@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Andrew Cooper , Joe Perches , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, David Miller Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] checkpatch: check for __smp outside barrier.h X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xen.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Introduction of __smp barriers cleans up a bunch of duplicate code, but it gives people an additional handle onto a "new" set of barriers - just because they're prefixed with __* unfortunately doesn't stop anyone from using it (as happened with other arch stuff before.) Add a checkpatch test so it will trigger a warning. Reported-by: Russell King Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin --- scripts/checkpatch.pl | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl index 1c01b7d..15cfca4 100755 --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl @@ -5143,6 +5143,16 @@ sub process { } } + my $underscore_smp_barriers = qr{__smp_(?:$smp_barrier_stems)}x; + + if ($realfile !~ m@^include/asm-generic/@ && + $realfile !~ m@/barrier\.h$@ && + $line =~ m/\b(?:$underscore_smp_barriers)\s*\(/ && + $line !~ m/^.\s*\#\s*define\s+(?:$underscore_smp_barriers)\s*\(/) { + WARN("MEMORY_BARRIER", + "__smp memory barriers shouldn't be used outside barrier.h and asm-generic\n" . $herecurr); + } + # check for waitqueue_active without a comment. if ($line =~ /\bwaitqueue_active\s*\(/) { if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) {