From patchwork Fri Jan 15 13:35:30 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ian Campbell X-Patchwork-Id: 8040761 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-xen-devel@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork2.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork2.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474E9BEEE5 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E242041A for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:38:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xen.org (lists.xenproject.org [50.57.142.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D5DD2040F for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aK4XW-0002hT-VL; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:35:42 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aK4XV-0002hO-6f for xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:35:41 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35] by server-1.bemta-4.messagelabs.com id 62/D3-09708-CA5F8965; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:35:40 +0000 X-Env-Sender: prvs=815b692d9=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1452864937!10303102!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n, received_headers: No Received headers X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.35.1; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1341 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2016 13:35:39 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-10.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 15 Jan 2016 13:35:39 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,299,1449532800"; d="scan'208";a="325397877" From: Ian Campbell To: , Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:35:30 +0000 Message-ID: <1452864930-5901-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: Dario Faggioli , Ian Campbell , Meng Xu Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST] ts-debian-install: increase time allowed for xen-create-image X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xen.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP This step is consistently timing out when run on cubietruck-*. Judging from the logs it appears to be completing during the 30s slack added by tcmdex (i.e. after the timeout message the rest of the output appears in the test step log). Looking at the results on arndale-* (which looks to pass reasonably reliably) I see that the regular test-armhf-armhf-xl job takes around 550s to do the xen-create-image while test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds typically takes around 1100s (twice as long). On cubietruck-braque test-armhf-armhf-xl uses 900s. One could therefore extrapolate that test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds might need more than 1800s and not be too surprised that it appears to need something a bit more than 2000s in practice. 2500s seems like sufficient headroom. For comparisson with arm on x86 godello takes around 210s in the normal case and 680s with RTDS (>3x slower) while nocera takes 265s and 640s (2.4x). (Those are from nearby but not identical flights in order to match up the host). Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell Reviewed-by: Dario Faggioli Acked-by: Ian Jackson --- Cc: Dario Faggioli Cc: Meng Xu Dario, Meng, I suppose a 2-3x slow down with RTDS on a dom0 operation (with no domains running) such as xen-create-image is not unexpected? --- ts-debian-install | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ts-debian-install b/ts-debian-install index f42edbf..2a7331d 100755 --- a/ts-debian-install +++ b/ts-debian-install @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ END $initrd_opt \\ $archarg END - target_cmd_root($ho, $cmd, 2000); + target_cmd_root($ho, $cmd, 2500); my $cfg= "/etc/xen/$gho->{Name}.cfg"; store_runvar("$gho->{Guest}_cfgpath", $cfg);