diff mbox

[3/5] x86/time: streamline platform time init on plt_init()

Message ID 1458231136-13457-4-git-send-email-joao.m.martins@oracle.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Joao Martins March 17, 2016, 4:12 p.m. UTC
And use to initialize platform time solely for clocksource=tsc,
as opposed to initializing platform overflow timer, which would
only fire in ~180 years (on 2.2 Ghz Broadwell processor).

Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
---
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

Changes since RFC:
 - Move clocksource_is_tsc variable to this patch.
 - s/1000000000/SECONDS(1)
---
 xen/arch/x86/time.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrew Cooper March 18, 2016, 8:32 p.m. UTC | #1
On 17/03/16 16:12, Joao Martins wrote:
> And use to initialize platform time solely for clocksource=tsc,
> as opposed to initializing platform overflow timer, which would
> only fire in ~180 years (on 2.2 Ghz Broadwell processor).
>
> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>

Again, just style corrections.

Reviewed-by Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/time.c b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> index 1311c58..5af8902 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> @@ -434,6 +434,7 @@ uint64_t ns_to_acpi_pm_tick(uint64_t ns)
>  /************************************************************
>   * PLATFORM TIMER 4: TSC
>   */
> +static bool_t clocksource_is_tsc = 0;

No need to explicitly initialise to 0.

>  static u64 tsc_freq;
>  static unsigned long tsc_max_warp;
>  static void tsc_check_reliability(void);
> @@ -466,7 +467,7 @@ static int __init init_tsctimer(struct platform_timesource *pts)
>      }
>  
>      pts->frequency = tsc_freq;
> -    return tsc_reliable;
> +    return ( clocksource_is_tsc = tsc_reliable );

While this does work, please avoid mixing an assignment and a return.

Something like

pts->frequency = tsc_freq;
clocksource_is_tsc = tsc_reliable;

return tsc_reliable;

is fine and easier logic to read.

> @@ -633,11 +648,22 @@ static void __init init_platform_timer(void)
>  
>      set_time_scale(&plt_scale, pts->frequency);
>  
> -    plt_overflow_period = scale_delta(
> -        1ull << (pts->counter_bits-1), &plt_scale);
> -    init_timer(&plt_overflow_timer, plt_overflow, NULL, 0);
>      plt_src = *pts;
> -    plt_overflow(NULL);
> +
> +    if ( clocksource_is_tsc )
> +    {
> +        plt_init();
> +    }
> +    else
> +    {
> +        plt_overflow_period = scale_delta(
> +            1ull << (pts->counter_bits-1), &plt_scale);

As you are moving this codeblock, please fix the style to
(pts->counter_bits - 1)

~Andrew
Joao Martins March 21, 2016, 11:45 a.m. UTC | #2
On 03/18/2016 08:32 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 17/03/16 16:12, Joao Martins wrote:
>> And use to initialize platform time solely for clocksource=tsc,
>> as opposed to initializing platform overflow timer, which would
>> only fire in ~180 years (on 2.2 Ghz Broadwell processor).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
> 
> Again, just style corrections.
> 
> Reviewed-by Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> 
I've fixed all these comments in v2, too. Thanks!

>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/time.c b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> index 1311c58..5af8902 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> @@ -434,6 +434,7 @@ uint64_t ns_to_acpi_pm_tick(uint64_t ns)
>>  /************************************************************
>>   * PLATFORM TIMER 4: TSC
>>   */
>> +static bool_t clocksource_is_tsc = 0;
> 
> No need to explicitly initialise to 0.
> 
>>  static u64 tsc_freq;
>>  static unsigned long tsc_max_warp;
>>  static void tsc_check_reliability(void);
>> @@ -466,7 +467,7 @@ static int __init init_tsctimer(struct platform_timesource *pts)
>>      }
>>  
>>      pts->frequency = tsc_freq;
>> -    return tsc_reliable;
>> +    return ( clocksource_is_tsc = tsc_reliable );
> 
> While this does work, please avoid mixing an assignment and a return.
> 
> Something like
> 
> pts->frequency = tsc_freq;
> clocksource_is_tsc = tsc_reliable;
> 
> return tsc_reliable;
> 
> is fine and easier logic to read.
> 
>> @@ -633,11 +648,22 @@ static void __init init_platform_timer(void)
>>  
>>      set_time_scale(&plt_scale, pts->frequency);
>>  
>> -    plt_overflow_period = scale_delta(
>> -        1ull << (pts->counter_bits-1), &plt_scale);
>> -    init_timer(&plt_overflow_timer, plt_overflow, NULL, 0);
>>      plt_src = *pts;
>> -    plt_overflow(NULL);
>> +
>> +    if ( clocksource_is_tsc )
>> +    {
>> +        plt_init();
>> +    }
>> +    else
>> +    {
>> +        plt_overflow_period = scale_delta(
>> +            1ull << (pts->counter_bits-1), &plt_scale);
> 
> As you are moving this codeblock, please fix the style to
> (pts->counter_bits - 1)
> 
> ~Andrew
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/time.c b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
index 1311c58..5af8902 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
@@ -434,6 +434,7 @@  uint64_t ns_to_acpi_pm_tick(uint64_t ns)
 /************************************************************
  * PLATFORM TIMER 4: TSC
  */
+static bool_t clocksource_is_tsc = 0;
 static u64 tsc_freq;
 static unsigned long tsc_max_warp;
 static void tsc_check_reliability(void);
@@ -466,7 +467,7 @@  static int __init init_tsctimer(struct platform_timesource *pts)
     }
 
     pts->frequency = tsc_freq;
-    return tsc_reliable;
+    return ( clocksource_is_tsc = tsc_reliable );
 }
 
 static u64 read_tsc(void)
@@ -516,17 +517,31 @@  static s_time_t __read_platform_stime(u64 platform_time)
     return (stime_platform_stamp + scale_delta(diff, &plt_scale));
 }
 
+static void __plt_init(void)
+{
+    u64 count;
+
+    ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&platform_timer_lock));
+    count = plt_src.read_counter();
+    plt_stamp64 += (count - plt_stamp) & plt_mask;
+    plt_stamp = count;
+}
+
+static void plt_init(void)
+{
+    spin_lock_irq(&platform_timer_lock);
+    __plt_init();
+    spin_unlock_irq(&platform_timer_lock);
+}
+
 static void plt_overflow(void *unused)
 {
     int i;
-    u64 count;
     s_time_t now, plt_now, plt_wrap;
 
     spin_lock_irq(&platform_timer_lock);
 
-    count = plt_src.read_counter();
-    plt_stamp64 += (count - plt_stamp) & plt_mask;
-    plt_stamp = count;
+    __plt_init();
 
     now = NOW();
     plt_wrap = __read_platform_stime(plt_stamp64);
@@ -633,11 +648,22 @@  static void __init init_platform_timer(void)
 
     set_time_scale(&plt_scale, pts->frequency);
 
-    plt_overflow_period = scale_delta(
-        1ull << (pts->counter_bits-1), &plt_scale);
-    init_timer(&plt_overflow_timer, plt_overflow, NULL, 0);
     plt_src = *pts;
-    plt_overflow(NULL);
+
+    if ( clocksource_is_tsc )
+    {
+        plt_init();
+    }
+    else
+    {
+        plt_overflow_period = scale_delta(
+            1ull << (pts->counter_bits-1), &plt_scale);
+        init_timer(&plt_overflow_timer, plt_overflow, NULL, 0);
+        plt_overflow(NULL);
+
+        printk("Platform timer overflow period is %lu secs\n",
+               plt_overflow_period/SECONDS(1));
+    }
 
     platform_timer_stamp = plt_stamp64;
     stime_platform_stamp = NOW();