From patchwork Mon Aug 19 01:25:26 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Chao Gao X-Patchwork-Id: 11100125 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0D413A0 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 01:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AFC2856D for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 01:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 0A43E2858A; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 01:24:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13B0D2856D for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 01:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hzWNM-0001if-38; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 01:22:24 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hzWNK-0001h2-I7 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 01:22:22 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: ca6eb12a-c21f-11e9-aee9-bc764e2007e4 Received: from mga09.intel.com (unknown [134.134.136.24]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id ca6eb12a-c21f-11e9-aee9-bc764e2007e4; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 01:22:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Aug 2019 18:22:20 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,403,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="261683986" Received: from gao-cwp.sh.intel.com ([10.239.159.26]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2019 18:22:17 -0700 From: Chao Gao To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:25:26 +0800 Message-Id: <1566177928-19114-14-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1566177928-19114-1-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com> References: <1566177928-19114-1-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 13/15] x86/microcode: Synchronize late microcode loading X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Tian , Borislav Petkov , Ashok Raj , Wei Liu , Jun Nakajima , Andrew Cooper , Jan Beulich , Thomas Gleixner , Chao Gao , =?utf-8?q?Roger_Pau_Monn=C3=A9?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP This patch ports microcode improvement patches from linux kernel. Before you read any further: the early loading method is still the preferred one and you should always do that. The following patch is improving the late loading mechanism for long running jobs and cloud use cases. Gather all cores and serialize the microcode update on them by doing it one-by-one to make the late update process as reliable as possible and avoid potential issues caused by the microcode update. Signed-off-by: Chao Gao Tested-by: Chao Gao [linux commit: a5321aec6412b20b5ad15db2d6b916c05349dbff] [linux commit: bb8c13d61a629276a162c1d2b1a20a815cbcfbb7] Cc: Kevin Tian Cc: Jun Nakajima Cc: Ashok Raj Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Andrew Cooper Cc: Jan Beulich --- Changes in v9: - log __buildin_return_address(0) when timeout - divide CPUs into three logical sets and they will call different functions during ucode loading. The 'control thread' is chosen to coordinate ucode loading on all CPUs. Since only control thread would set 'loading_state', we can get rid of 'cmpxchg' stuff in v8. - s/rep_nop/cpu_relax - each thread updates its revision number itself - add XENLOG_ERR prefix for each line of multi-line log messages Changes in v8: - to support blocking #NMI handling during loading ucode * introduce a flag, 'loading_state', to mark the start or end of ucode loading. * use a bitmap for cpu callin since if cpu may stay in #NMI handling, there are two places for a cpu to call in. bitmap won't be counted twice. * don't wait for all CPUs callout, just wait for CPUs that perform the update. We have to do this because some threads may be stuck in NMI handling (where cannot reach the rendezvous). - emit a warning if the system stays in stop_machine context for more than 1s - comment that rdtsc is fine while loading an update - use cmpxchg() to avoid panic being called on multiple CPUs - Propagate revision number to other threads - refine comments and prompt messages Changes in v7: - Check whether 'timeout' is 0 rather than "<=0" since it is unsigned int. - reword the comment above microcode_update_cpu() to clearly state that one thread per core should do the update. --- xen/arch/x86/microcode.c | 289 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 267 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c index bdd9c9f..91f9e81 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c @@ -30,18 +30,52 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include +#include +#include #include #include #include #include +/* + * Before performing a late microcode update on any thread, we + * rendezvous all cpus in stop_machine context. The timeout for + * waiting for cpu rendezvous is 30ms. It is the timeout used by + * live patching + */ +#define MICROCODE_CALLIN_TIMEOUT_US 30000 + +/* + * Timeout for each thread to complete update is set to 1s. It is a + * conservative choice considering all possible interference. + */ +#define MICROCODE_UPDATE_TIMEOUT_US 1000000 + static module_t __initdata ucode_mod; static signed int __initdata ucode_mod_idx; static bool_t __initdata ucode_mod_forced; +static unsigned int nr_cores; + +/* + * These states help to coordinate CPUs during loading an update. + * + * The semantics of each state is as follow: + * - LOADING_PREPARE: initial state of 'loading_state'. + * - LOADING_CALLIN: CPUs are allowed to callin. + * - LOADING_ENTER: all CPUs have called in. Initiate ucode loading. + * - LOADING_EXIT: ucode loading is done or aborted. + */ +static enum { + LOADING_PREPARE, + LOADING_CALLIN, + LOADING_ENTER, + LOADING_EXIT, +} loading_state; /* * If we scan the initramfs.cpio for the early microcode code @@ -190,6 +224,16 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(microcode_mutex); DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_signature, cpu_sig); /* + * Count the CPUs that have entered, exited the rendezvous and succeeded in + * microcode update during late microcode update respectively. + * + * Note that a bitmap is used for callin to allow cpu to set a bit multiple + * times. It is required to do busy-loop in #NMI handling. + */ +static cpumask_t cpu_callin_map; +static atomic_t cpu_out, cpu_updated; + +/* * Return a patch that covers current CPU. If there are multiple patches, * return the one with the highest revision number. Return error If no * patch is found and an error occurs during the parsing process. Otherwise @@ -232,6 +276,34 @@ bool microcode_update_cache(struct microcode_patch *patch) return true; } +/* Wait for a condition to be met with a timeout (us). */ +static int wait_for_condition(int (*func)(void *data), void *data, + unsigned int timeout) +{ + while ( !func(data) ) + { + if ( !timeout-- ) + { + printk("CPU%u: Timeout in %pS\n", + smp_processor_id(), __builtin_return_address(0)); + return -EBUSY; + } + udelay(1); + } + + return 0; +} + +static int wait_cpu_callin(void *nr) +{ + return cpumask_weight(&cpu_callin_map) >= (unsigned long)nr; +} + +static int wait_cpu_callout(void *nr) +{ + return atomic_read(&cpu_out) >= (unsigned long)nr; +} + /* * Load a microcode update to current CPU. * @@ -265,37 +337,155 @@ static int microcode_update_cpu(const struct microcode_patch *patch) return err; } -static long do_microcode_update(void *patch) +static int slave_thread_fn(void) +{ + unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); + unsigned int master = cpumask_first(this_cpu(cpu_sibling_mask)); + + while ( loading_state != LOADING_CALLIN ) + cpu_relax(); + + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_callin_map); + + while ( loading_state != LOADING_EXIT ) + cpu_relax(); + + /* Copy update revision from the "master" thread. */ + this_cpu(cpu_sig).rev = per_cpu(cpu_sig, master).rev; + + return 0; +} + +static int master_thread_fn(const struct microcode_patch *patch) +{ + unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); + int ret = 0; + + while ( loading_state != LOADING_CALLIN ) + cpu_relax(); + + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_callin_map); + + while ( loading_state != LOADING_ENTER ) + cpu_relax(); + + /* + * If an error happened, control thread would set 'loading_state' + * to LOADING_EXIT. Don't perform ucode loading for this case + */ + if ( loading_state == LOADING_EXIT ) + return ret; + + ret = microcode_ops->apply_microcode(patch); + if ( !ret ) + atomic_inc(&cpu_updated); + atomic_inc(&cpu_out); + + while ( loading_state != LOADING_EXIT ) + cpu_relax(); + + return ret; +} + +static int control_thread_fn(const struct microcode_patch *patch) { - unsigned int cpu; + unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(), done; + unsigned long tick; + int ret; - /* Store the patch after a successful loading */ - if ( !microcode_update_cpu(patch) && patch ) + /* Allow threads to call in */ + loading_state = LOADING_CALLIN; + smp_mb(); + + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_callin_map); + + /* Waiting for all threads calling in */ + ret = wait_for_condition(wait_cpu_callin, + (void *)(unsigned long)num_online_cpus(), + MICROCODE_CALLIN_TIMEOUT_US); + if ( ret ) { + loading_state = LOADING_EXIT; + return ret; + } + + /* Let master threads load the given ucode update */ + loading_state = LOADING_ENTER; + smp_mb(); + + ret = microcode_ops->apply_microcode(patch); + if ( !ret ) + atomic_inc(&cpu_updated); + atomic_inc(&cpu_out); + + tick = rdtsc_ordered(); + /* Waiting for master threads finishing update */ + done = atomic_read(&cpu_out); + while ( done != nr_cores ) { - spin_lock(µcode_mutex); - microcode_update_cache(patch); - spin_unlock(µcode_mutex); - patch = NULL; + /* + * During each timeout interval, at least a CPU is expected to + * finish its update. Otherwise, something goes wrong. + * + * Note that RDTSC (in wait_for_condition()) is safe for threads to + * execute while waiting for completion of loading an update. + */ + if ( wait_for_condition(wait_cpu_callout, + (void *)(unsigned long)(done + 1), + MICROCODE_UPDATE_TIMEOUT_US) ) + panic("Timeout when finished updating microcode (finished %u/%u)", + done, nr_cores); + + /* Print warning message once if long time is spent here */ + if ( tick && rdtsc_ordered() - tick >= cpu_khz * 1000 ) + { + printk(XENLOG_WARNING + "WARNING: UPDATING MICROCODE HAS CONSUMED MORE THAN 1 SECOND!\n"); + tick = 0; + } + done = atomic_read(&cpu_out); } - if ( microcode_ops->end_update ) - microcode_ops->end_update(); + /* Mark loading is done to unblock other threads */ + loading_state = LOADING_EXIT; + smp_mb(); - cpu = cpumask_next(smp_processor_id(), &cpu_online_map); - if ( cpu < nr_cpu_ids ) - return continue_hypercall_on_cpu(cpu, do_microcode_update, patch); + return ret; +} - /* Free the patch if no CPU has loaded it successfully. */ - if ( patch ) - microcode_free_patch(patch); +static int do_microcode_update(void *patch) +{ + unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); + /* + * "master" thread is the one with the lowest thread id among all siblings + * thread in a core or a compute unit. It is chosen to load a microcode + * update. + */ + unsigned int master = cpumask_first(this_cpu(cpu_sibling_mask)); + int ret; - return 0; + /* + * The control thread set state to coordinate ucode loading. Master threads + * load the given ucode patch. Slave threads just wait for the completion + * of the ucode loading process. + */ + if ( cpu == cpumask_first(&cpu_online_map) ) + ret = control_thread_fn(patch); + else if ( cpu == master ) + ret = master_thread_fn(patch); + else + ret = slave_thread_fn(); + + if ( microcode_ops->end_update ) + microcode_ops->end_update(); + + return ret; } int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void) buf, unsigned long len) { int ret; void *buffer; + unsigned int cpu, updated; struct microcode_patch *patch; if ( len != (uint32_t)len ) @@ -314,11 +504,18 @@ int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void) buf, unsigned long len) goto free; } + /* cpu_online_map must not change during update */ + if ( !get_cpu_maps() ) + { + ret = -EBUSY; + goto free; + } + if ( microcode_ops->start_update ) { ret = microcode_ops->start_update(); if ( ret != 0 ) - goto free; + goto put; } patch = parse_blob(buffer, len); @@ -326,19 +523,67 @@ int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void) buf, unsigned long len) { ret = PTR_ERR(patch); printk(XENLOG_INFO "Parsing microcode blob error %d\n", ret); - goto free; + goto put; } if ( !patch ) { printk(XENLOG_INFO "No ucode found. Update aborted!\n"); ret = -EINVAL; - goto free; + goto put; + } + + cpumask_clear(&cpu_callin_map); + atomic_set(&cpu_out, 0); + atomic_set(&cpu_updated, 0); + loading_state = LOADING_PREPARE; + + /* Calculate the number of online CPU core */ + nr_cores = 0; + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) + if ( cpu == cpumask_first(per_cpu(cpu_sibling_mask, cpu)) ) + nr_cores++; + + printk(XENLOG_INFO "%u cores are to update their microcode\n", nr_cores); + + /* + * We intend to disable interrupt for long time, which may lead to + * watchdog timeout. + */ + watchdog_disable(); + /* + * Late loading dance. Why the heavy-handed stop_machine effort? + * + * - HT siblings must be idle and not execute other code while the other + * sibling is loading microcode in order to avoid any negative + * interactions cause by the loading. + * + * - In addition, microcode update on the cores must be serialized until + * this requirement can be relaxed in the future. Right now, this is + * conservative and good. + */ + ret = stop_machine_run(do_microcode_update, patch, NR_CPUS); + watchdog_enable(); + + updated = atomic_read(&cpu_updated); + if ( updated > 0 ) + { + spin_lock(µcode_mutex); + microcode_update_cache(patch); + spin_unlock(µcode_mutex); } + else + microcode_free_patch(patch); - ret = continue_hypercall_on_cpu(cpumask_first(&cpu_online_map), - do_microcode_update, patch); + if ( updated && updated != nr_cores ) + printk(XENLOG_ERR "ERROR: Updating microcode succeeded on %u cores and failed\n" + XENLOG_ERR "on other %u cores. A system with differing microcode \n" + XENLOG_ERR "revisions is considered unstable. Please reboot and do not\n" + XENLOG_ERR "load the microcode that triggersthis warning!\n", + updated, nr_cores - updated); + put: + put_cpu_maps(); free: xfree(buffer); return ret;