From patchwork Mon Aug 19 01:25:14 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Chao Gao X-Patchwork-Id: 11100111 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C810513A0 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 01:23:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B952B2856D for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 01:23:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id AD6E72858A; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 01:23:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF67228587 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 01:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hzWMU-00013K-Tx; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 01:21:30 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hzWMT-00012z-PF for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 01:21:29 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: ab9613b0-c21f-11e9-8be3-12813bfff9fa Received: from mga03.intel.com (unknown [134.134.136.65]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id ab9613b0-c21f-11e9-8be3-12813bfff9fa; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 01:21:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Aug 2019 18:21:28 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,403,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="261683825" Received: from gao-cwp.sh.intel.com ([10.239.159.26]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2019 18:21:27 -0700 From: Chao Gao To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:25:14 +0800 Message-Id: <1566177928-19114-2-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1566177928-19114-1-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com> References: <1566177928-19114-1-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 01/15] microcode/intel: extend microcode_update_match() X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ashok Raj , Wei Liu , Andrew Cooper , Jan Beulich , Chao Gao , =?utf-8?q?Roger_Pau_Monn=C3=A9?= Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP to a more generic function. So that it can be used alone to check an update against the CPU signature and current update revision. Note that enum microcode_match_result will be used in common code (aka microcode.c), it has been placed in the common header. Signed-off-by: Chao Gao Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich --- Changes in v9: - microcode_update_match() doesn't accept (sig, pf, rev) any longer. Hence, it won't be used to compare two arbitrary updates. - rewrite patch description Changes in v8: - make sure enough room for an extended header and signature array Changes in v6: - eliminate unnecessary type casting in microcode_update_match - check if a patch has an extend header Changes in v5: - constify the extended_signature - use named enum type for the return value of microcode_update_match --- xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h | 6 +++++ 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c index 22fdeca..c185b5c 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c @@ -134,14 +134,39 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig) return 0; } -static inline int microcode_update_match( - unsigned int cpu_num, const struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header, - int sig, int pf) +/* Check an update against the CPU signature and current update revision */ +static enum microcode_match_result microcode_update_match( + const struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header, unsigned int cpu) { - struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu_num); - - return (sigmatch(sig, uci->cpu_sig.sig, pf, uci->cpu_sig.pf) && - (mc_header->rev > uci->cpu_sig.rev)); + const struct extended_sigtable *ext_header; + const struct extended_signature *ext_sig; + unsigned int i; + struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu); + unsigned int sig = uci->cpu_sig.sig; + unsigned int pf = uci->cpu_sig.pf; + unsigned int rev = uci->cpu_sig.rev; + unsigned long data_size = get_datasize(mc_header); + const void *end = (const void *)mc_header + get_totalsize(mc_header); + + if ( sigmatch(sig, mc_header->sig, pf, mc_header->pf) ) + return (mc_header->rev > rev) ? NEW_UCODE : OLD_UCODE; + + ext_header = (const void *)(mc_header + 1) + data_size; + ext_sig = (const void *)(ext_header + 1); + + /* + * Make sure there is enough space to hold an extended header and enough + * array elements. + */ + if ( (end < (const void *)ext_sig) || + (end < (const void *)(ext_sig + ext_header->count)) ) + return MIS_UCODE; + + for ( i = 0; i < ext_header->count; i++ ) + if ( sigmatch(sig, ext_sig[i].sig, pf, ext_sig[i].pf) ) + return (mc_header->rev > rev) ? NEW_UCODE : OLD_UCODE; + + return MIS_UCODE; } static int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc) @@ -243,31 +268,12 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(const void *mc, unsigned int cpu) { struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu); const struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header = mc; - const struct extended_sigtable *ext_header; unsigned long total_size = get_totalsize(mc_header); - int ext_sigcount, i; - struct extended_signature *ext_sig; void *new_mc; - if ( microcode_update_match(cpu, mc_header, - mc_header->sig, mc_header->pf) ) - goto find; - - if ( total_size <= (get_datasize(mc_header) + MC_HEADER_SIZE) ) + if ( microcode_update_match(mc, cpu) != NEW_UCODE ) return 0; - ext_header = mc + get_datasize(mc_header) + MC_HEADER_SIZE; - ext_sigcount = ext_header->count; - ext_sig = (void *)ext_header + EXT_HEADER_SIZE; - for ( i = 0; i < ext_sigcount; i++ ) - { - if ( microcode_update_match(cpu, mc_header, - ext_sig->sig, ext_sig->pf) ) - goto find; - ext_sig++; - } - return 0; - find: pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d found a matching microcode update with" " version %#x (current=%#x)\n", cpu, mc_header->rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev); diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h index 23ea954..882f560 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h @@ -3,6 +3,12 @@ #include +enum microcode_match_result { + OLD_UCODE, /* signature matched, but revision id is older or equal */ + NEW_UCODE, /* signature matched, but revision id is newer */ + MIS_UCODE, /* signature mismatched */ +}; + struct cpu_signature; struct ucode_cpu_info;