diff mbox series

[XEN,v4,3/4] xen/x86: address violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 13.1

Message ID 16bb514ac0a5fe0d6e9a2c95279a8200ff4495c6.1706886631.git.simone.ballarin@bugseng.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series address violation of MISRA C:2012 Rule 13.1 | expand

Commit Message

Simone Ballarin Feb. 2, 2024, 3:16 p.m. UTC
Rule 13.1: Initializer lists shall not contain persistent side effects

This patch moves expressions with side-effects into new variables before
the initializer lists.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@bugseng.com>
---
 xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c | 9 ++++++---
 xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c | 3 ++-
 xen/arch/x86/setup.c   | 3 ++-
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Jan Beulich Feb. 6, 2024, 1:13 p.m. UTC | #1
On 02.02.2024 16:16, Simone Ballarin wrote:
> Rule 13.1: Initializer lists shall not contain persistent side effects
> 
> This patch moves expressions with side-effects into new variables before
> the initializer lists.
> 
> No functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@bugseng.com>

To be honest, I don't like this. It's more code for no gain. Really its
hampering clarity imo. I'm willing to be convinced otherwise, but for
now this gets a nack from me.

As an aside, ...

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c
> @@ -2559,9 +2559,12 @@ integer_param("max_gsi_irqs", max_gsi_irqs);
>  
>  static __init bool bad_ioapic_register(unsigned int idx)
>  {
> -    union IO_APIC_reg_00 reg_00 = { .raw = io_apic_read(idx, 0) };
> -    union IO_APIC_reg_01 reg_01 = { .raw = io_apic_read(idx, 1) };
> -    union IO_APIC_reg_02 reg_02 = { .raw = io_apic_read(idx, 2) };
> +    uint32_t reg_00_raw = io_apic_read(idx, 0);
> +    uint32_t reg_01_raw = io_apic_read(idx, 1);
> +    uint32_t reg_02_raw = io_apic_read(idx, 2);

... while you properly use uint32_t here, ...

> +    union IO_APIC_reg_00 reg_00 = { .raw = reg_00_raw };
> +    union IO_APIC_reg_01 reg_01 = { .raw = reg_01_raw };
> +    union IO_APIC_reg_02 reg_02 = { .raw = reg_02_raw };
>  
>      if ( reg_00.raw == -1 && reg_01.raw == -1 && reg_02.raw == -1 )
>      {
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c
> @@ -798,11 +798,12 @@ void __init mp_register_lapic_address (
>  
>  int mp_register_lapic(u32 id, bool enabled, bool hotplug)
>  {
> +	u32 apic = apic_read(APIC_LVR);

... why the being-phased-out u32 here?

Jan

>  	struct mpc_config_processor processor = {
>  		.mpc_type = MP_PROCESSOR,
>  		/* Note: We don't fill in fields not consumed anywhere. */
>  		.mpc_apicid = id,
> -		.mpc_apicver = GET_APIC_VERSION(apic_read(APIC_LVR)),
> +		.mpc_apicver = GET_APIC_VERSION(apic),
>  		.mpc_cpuflag = (enabled ? CPU_ENABLED : 0) |
>  			       (id == boot_cpu_physical_apicid ?
>  				CPU_BOOTPROCESSOR : 0),
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
> @@ -885,13 +885,14 @@ static struct domain *__init create_dom0(const module_t *image,
>  {
>      static char __initdata cmdline[MAX_GUEST_CMDLINE];
>  
> +    unsigned int max_vcpus = dom0_max_vcpus();
>      struct xen_domctl_createdomain dom0_cfg = {
>          .flags = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TBOOT) ? XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_s3_integrity : 0,
>          .max_evtchn_port = -1,
>          .max_grant_frames = -1,
>          .max_maptrack_frames = -1,
>          .grant_opts = XEN_DOMCTL_GRANT_version(opt_gnttab_max_version),
> -        .max_vcpus = dom0_max_vcpus(),
> +        .max_vcpus = max_vcpus,
>          .arch = {
>              .misc_flags = opt_dom0_msr_relaxed ? XEN_X86_MSR_RELAXED : 0,
>          },
Stefano Stabellini Feb. 7, 2024, 12:56 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.02.2024 16:16, Simone Ballarin wrote:
> > Rule 13.1: Initializer lists shall not contain persistent side effects
> > 
> > This patch moves expressions with side-effects into new variables before
> > the initializer lists.
> > 
> > No functional changes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@bugseng.com>
> 
> To be honest, I don't like this. It's more code for no gain. Really its
> hampering clarity imo. I'm willing to be convinced otherwise, but for
> now this gets a nack from me.

Which part of the patch you don't like? The changes to
bad_ioapic_register?



> As an aside, ...
> 
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c
> > @@ -2559,9 +2559,12 @@ integer_param("max_gsi_irqs", max_gsi_irqs);
> >  
> >  static __init bool bad_ioapic_register(unsigned int idx)
> >  {
> > -    union IO_APIC_reg_00 reg_00 = { .raw = io_apic_read(idx, 0) };
> > -    union IO_APIC_reg_01 reg_01 = { .raw = io_apic_read(idx, 1) };
> > -    union IO_APIC_reg_02 reg_02 = { .raw = io_apic_read(idx, 2) };
> > +    uint32_t reg_00_raw = io_apic_read(idx, 0);
> > +    uint32_t reg_01_raw = io_apic_read(idx, 1);
> > +    uint32_t reg_02_raw = io_apic_read(idx, 2);
> 
> ... while you properly use uint32_t here, ...
> 
> > +    union IO_APIC_reg_00 reg_00 = { .raw = reg_00_raw };
> > +    union IO_APIC_reg_01 reg_01 = { .raw = reg_01_raw };
> > +    union IO_APIC_reg_02 reg_02 = { .raw = reg_02_raw };
> >  
> >      if ( reg_00.raw == -1 && reg_01.raw == -1 && reg_02.raw == -1 )
> >      {
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c
> > @@ -798,11 +798,12 @@ void __init mp_register_lapic_address (
> >  
> >  int mp_register_lapic(u32 id, bool enabled, bool hotplug)
> >  {
> > +	u32 apic = apic_read(APIC_LVR);
> 
> ... why the being-phased-out u32 here?
> 
> Jan
> 
> >  	struct mpc_config_processor processor = {
> >  		.mpc_type = MP_PROCESSOR,
> >  		/* Note: We don't fill in fields not consumed anywhere. */
> >  		.mpc_apicid = id,
> > -		.mpc_apicver = GET_APIC_VERSION(apic_read(APIC_LVR)),
> > +		.mpc_apicver = GET_APIC_VERSION(apic),
> >  		.mpc_cpuflag = (enabled ? CPU_ENABLED : 0) |
> >  			       (id == boot_cpu_physical_apicid ?
> >  				CPU_BOOTPROCESSOR : 0),
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
> > @@ -885,13 +885,14 @@ static struct domain *__init create_dom0(const module_t *image,
> >  {
> >      static char __initdata cmdline[MAX_GUEST_CMDLINE];
> >  
> > +    unsigned int max_vcpus = dom0_max_vcpus();
> >      struct xen_domctl_createdomain dom0_cfg = {
> >          .flags = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TBOOT) ? XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_s3_integrity : 0,
> >          .max_evtchn_port = -1,
> >          .max_grant_frames = -1,
> >          .max_maptrack_frames = -1,
> >          .grant_opts = XEN_DOMCTL_GRANT_version(opt_gnttab_max_version),
> > -        .max_vcpus = dom0_max_vcpus(),
> > +        .max_vcpus = max_vcpus,
> >          .arch = {
> >              .misc_flags = opt_dom0_msr_relaxed ? XEN_X86_MSR_RELAXED : 0,
> >          },
>
Jan Beulich Feb. 7, 2024, 7:35 a.m. UTC | #3
On 07.02.2024 01:56, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 02.02.2024 16:16, Simone Ballarin wrote:
>>> Rule 13.1: Initializer lists shall not contain persistent side effects
>>>
>>> This patch moves expressions with side-effects into new variables before
>>> the initializer lists.
>>>
>>> No functional changes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@bugseng.com>
>>
>> To be honest, I don't like this. It's more code for no gain. Really its
>> hampering clarity imo. I'm willing to be convinced otherwise, but for
>> now this gets a nack from me.
> 
> Which part of the patch you don't like? The changes to
> bad_ioapic_register?

Really all of them. bad_ioapic_register() is merely worst.

Jan
Simone Ballarin Feb. 7, 2024, 12:28 p.m. UTC | #4
On 06/02/24 14:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.02.2024 16:16, Simone Ballarin wrote:
>> Rule 13.1: Initializer lists shall not contain persistent side effects
>>
>> This patch moves expressions with side-effects into new variables before
>> the initializer lists.
>>
>> No functional changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@bugseng.com>
> 
> To be honest, I don't like this. It's more code for no gain. Really its
> hampering clarity imo. I'm willing to be convinced otherwise, but for
> now this gets a nack from me.
> 
> As an aside, ...
> 
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c
>> @@ -2559,9 +2559,12 @@ integer_param("max_gsi_irqs", max_gsi_irqs);
>>   
>>   static __init bool bad_ioapic_register(unsigned int idx)
>>   {
>> -    union IO_APIC_reg_00 reg_00 = { .raw = io_apic_read(idx, 0) };
>> -    union IO_APIC_reg_01 reg_01 = { .raw = io_apic_read(idx, 1) };
>> -    union IO_APIC_reg_02 reg_02 = { .raw = io_apic_read(idx, 2) };
>> +    uint32_t reg_00_raw = io_apic_read(idx, 0);
>> +    uint32_t reg_01_raw = io_apic_read(idx, 1);
>> +    uint32_t reg_02_raw = io_apic_read(idx, 2);

I'll propose a deviation for these single item initializers.

> 
> ... while you properly use uint32_t here, ...
> 
>> +    union IO_APIC_reg_00 reg_00 = { .raw = reg_00_raw };
>> +    union IO_APIC_reg_01 reg_01 = { .raw = reg_01_raw };
>> +    union IO_APIC_reg_02 reg_02 = { .raw = reg_02_raw };
>>   
>>       if ( reg_00.raw == -1 && reg_01.raw == -1 && reg_02.raw == -1 )
>>       {
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c
>> @@ -798,11 +798,12 @@ void __init mp_register_lapic_address (
>>   
>>   int mp_register_lapic(u32 id, bool enabled, bool hotplug)
>>   {
>> +	u32 apic = apic_read(APIC_LVR);> 
> ... why the being-phased-out u32 here?
> 

It was just to be coherent with the type of id.
I will use uint32_t in the next submission.

> Jan
> 
>>   	struct mpc_config_processor processor = {
>>   		.mpc_type = MP_PROCESSOR,
>>   		/* Note: We don't fill in fields not consumed anywhere. */
>>   		.mpc_apicid = id,
>> -		.mpc_apicver = GET_APIC_VERSION(apic_read(APIC_LVR)),
>> +		.mpc_apicver = GET_APIC_VERSION(apic),
>>   		.mpc_cpuflag = (enabled ? CPU_ENABLED : 0) |
>>   			       (id == boot_cpu_physical_apicid ?
>>   				CPU_BOOTPROCESSOR : 0),
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
>> @@ -885,13 +885,14 @@ static struct domain *__init create_dom0(const module_t *image,
>>   {
>>       static char __initdata cmdline[MAX_GUEST_CMDLINE];
>>   
>> +    unsigned int max_vcpus = dom0_max_vcpus();
>>       struct xen_domctl_createdomain dom0_cfg = {
>>           .flags = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TBOOT) ? XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_s3_integrity : 0,
>>           .max_evtchn_port = -1,
>>           .max_grant_frames = -1,
>>           .max_maptrack_frames = -1,
>>           .grant_opts = XEN_DOMCTL_GRANT_version(opt_gnttab_max_version),
>> -        .max_vcpus = dom0_max_vcpus(),
>> +        .max_vcpus = max_vcpus,
>>           .arch = {
>>               .misc_flags = opt_dom0_msr_relaxed ? XEN_X86_MSR_RELAXED : 0,
>>           },
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c b/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c
index b48a642465..4a6ab85689 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c
@@ -2559,9 +2559,12 @@  integer_param("max_gsi_irqs", max_gsi_irqs);
 
 static __init bool bad_ioapic_register(unsigned int idx)
 {
-    union IO_APIC_reg_00 reg_00 = { .raw = io_apic_read(idx, 0) };
-    union IO_APIC_reg_01 reg_01 = { .raw = io_apic_read(idx, 1) };
-    union IO_APIC_reg_02 reg_02 = { .raw = io_apic_read(idx, 2) };
+    uint32_t reg_00_raw = io_apic_read(idx, 0);
+    uint32_t reg_01_raw = io_apic_read(idx, 1);
+    uint32_t reg_02_raw = io_apic_read(idx, 2);
+    union IO_APIC_reg_00 reg_00 = { .raw = reg_00_raw };
+    union IO_APIC_reg_01 reg_01 = { .raw = reg_01_raw };
+    union IO_APIC_reg_02 reg_02 = { .raw = reg_02_raw };
 
     if ( reg_00.raw == -1 && reg_01.raw == -1 && reg_02.raw == -1 )
     {
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c b/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c
index d8ccab2449..81a819403b 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c
@@ -798,11 +798,12 @@  void __init mp_register_lapic_address (
 
 int mp_register_lapic(u32 id, bool enabled, bool hotplug)
 {
+	u32 apic = apic_read(APIC_LVR);
 	struct mpc_config_processor processor = {
 		.mpc_type = MP_PROCESSOR,
 		/* Note: We don't fill in fields not consumed anywhere. */
 		.mpc_apicid = id,
-		.mpc_apicver = GET_APIC_VERSION(apic_read(APIC_LVR)),
+		.mpc_apicver = GET_APIC_VERSION(apic),
 		.mpc_cpuflag = (enabled ? CPU_ENABLED : 0) |
 			       (id == boot_cpu_physical_apicid ?
 				CPU_BOOTPROCESSOR : 0),
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
index ee682dd136..886031d86a 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
@@ -885,13 +885,14 @@  static struct domain *__init create_dom0(const module_t *image,
 {
     static char __initdata cmdline[MAX_GUEST_CMDLINE];
 
+    unsigned int max_vcpus = dom0_max_vcpus();
     struct xen_domctl_createdomain dom0_cfg = {
         .flags = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TBOOT) ? XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_s3_integrity : 0,
         .max_evtchn_port = -1,
         .max_grant_frames = -1,
         .max_maptrack_frames = -1,
         .grant_opts = XEN_DOMCTL_GRANT_version(opt_gnttab_max_version),
-        .max_vcpus = dom0_max_vcpus(),
+        .max_vcpus = max_vcpus,
         .arch = {
             .misc_flags = opt_dom0_msr_relaxed ? XEN_X86_MSR_RELAXED : 0,
         },