Message ID | 20200121150704.126001-3-jeff.kubascik@dornerworks.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | xen/arm: physical timer improvements | expand |
Hi, On 21/01/2020 15:07, Jeff Kubascik wrote: > Xen will only store the CompareValue as it can be derived from the > TimerValue (ARM DDI 0487E.a section D11.2.4): > > CompareValue = (Counter[63:0] + SignExtend(TimerValue))[63:0] > > While the TimerValue is a 32-bit signed value, our implementation > assumed it is a 32-bit unsigned value. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kubascik <jeff.kubascik@dornerworks.com> Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org> Cheers,
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c b/xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c index 0c78a65863..fed89498a9 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static bool vtimer_cntp_tval(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint32_t *r, } else { - v->arch.phys_timer.cval = cntpct + *r; + v->arch.phys_timer.cval = cntpct + (uint64_t)(int32_t)*r; if ( v->arch.phys_timer.ctl & CNTx_CTL_ENABLE ) { v->arch.phys_timer.ctl &= ~CNTx_CTL_PENDING;
Xen will only store the CompareValue as it can be derived from the TimerValue (ARM DDI 0487E.a section D11.2.4): CompareValue = (Counter[63:0] + SignExtend(TimerValue))[63:0] While the TimerValue is a 32-bit signed value, our implementation assumed it is a 32-bit unsigned value. Signed-off-by: Jeff Kubascik <jeff.kubascik@dornerworks.com> --- xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)