From patchwork Tue Feb 18 12:21:12 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?b?SsO8cmdlbiBHcm/Dnw==?= X-Patchwork-Id: 11388323 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CD792A for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F919207FD for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:22:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9F919207FD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1j41sU-0006e6-EB; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:21:26 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1j41sS-0006dz-PK for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:21:24 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 29edd338-5249-11ea-b0fd-bc764e2007e4 Received: from mx2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.15]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 29edd338-5249-11ea-b0fd-bc764e2007e4; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:21:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7829DB367; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:21:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Juergen Gross To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:21:12 +0100 Message-Id: <20200218122114.17596-3-jgross@suse.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.4 In-Reply-To: <20200218122114.17596-1-jgross@suse.com> References: <20200218122114.17596-1-jgross@suse.com> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] xen/rcu: don't use stop_machine_run() for rcu_barrier() X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini , Julien Grall , Wei Liu , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , George Dunlap , Andrew Cooper , Ian Jackson , Jan Beulich MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" Today rcu_barrier() is calling stop_machine_run() to synchronize all physical cpus in order to ensure all pending rcu calls have finished when returning. As stop_machine_run() is using tasklets this requires scheduling of idle vcpus on all cpus imposing the need to call rcu_barrier() on idle cpus only in case of core scheduling being active, as otherwise a scheduling deadlock would occur. There is no need at all to do the syncing of the cpus in tasklets, as rcu activity is started in __do_softirq() called whenever softirq activity is allowed. So rcu_barrier() can easily be modified to use softirq for synchronization of the cpus no longer requiring any scheduling activity. As there already is a rcu softirq reuse that for the synchronization. Remove the barrier element from struct rcu_data as it isn't used. Finally switch rcu_barrier() to return void as it now can never fail. Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross --- V2: - use get_cpu_maps() - add recursion detection --- xen/common/rcupdate.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- xen/include/xen/rcupdate.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/common/rcupdate.c b/xen/common/rcupdate.c index 079ea9d8a1..e6add0b120 100644 --- a/xen/common/rcupdate.c +++ b/xen/common/rcupdate.c @@ -83,7 +83,6 @@ struct rcu_data { struct rcu_head **donetail; long blimit; /* Upper limit on a processed batch */ int cpu; - struct rcu_head barrier; long last_rs_qlen; /* qlen during the last resched */ /* 3) idle CPUs handling */ @@ -91,6 +90,7 @@ struct rcu_data { bool idle_timer_active; bool process_callbacks; + bool barrier_active; }; /* @@ -143,47 +143,68 @@ static int qhimark = 10000; static int qlowmark = 100; static int rsinterval = 1000; -struct rcu_barrier_data { - struct rcu_head head; - atomic_t *cpu_count; -}; +/* + * rcu_barrier() handling: + * cpu_count holds the number of cpu required to finish barrier handling. + * Cpus are synchronized via softirq mechanism. rcu_barrier() is regarded to + * be active if cpu_count is not zero. In case rcu_barrier() is called on + * multiple cpus it is enough to check for cpu_count being not zero on entry + * and to call process_pending_softirqs() in a loop until cpu_count drops to + * zero, as syncing has been requested already and we don't need to sync + * multiple times. + */ +static atomic_t cpu_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0); static void rcu_barrier_callback(struct rcu_head *head) { - struct rcu_barrier_data *data = container_of( - head, struct rcu_barrier_data, head); - atomic_inc(data->cpu_count); + atomic_dec(&cpu_count); } -static int rcu_barrier_action(void *_cpu_count) +static void rcu_barrier_action(void) { - struct rcu_barrier_data data = { .cpu_count = _cpu_count }; - - ASSERT(!local_irq_is_enabled()); - local_irq_enable(); + struct rcu_head head; /* * When callback is executed, all previously-queued RCU work on this CPU * is completed. When all CPUs have executed their callback, data.cpu_count * will have been incremented to include every online CPU. */ - call_rcu(&data.head, rcu_barrier_callback); + call_rcu(&head, rcu_barrier_callback); - while ( atomic_read(data.cpu_count) != num_online_cpus() ) + while ( atomic_read(&cpu_count) ) { process_pending_softirqs(); cpu_relax(); } - - local_irq_disable(); - - return 0; } -int rcu_barrier(void) +void rcu_barrier(void) { - atomic_t cpu_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0); - return stop_machine_run(rcu_barrier_action, &cpu_count, NR_CPUS); + int initial = atomic_read(&cpu_count); + + while ( !get_cpu_maps() ) + { + process_pending_softirqs(); + if ( initial && !atomic_read(&cpu_count) ) + return; + + cpu_relax(); + initial = atomic_read(&cpu_count); + } + + if ( !initial ) + { + atomic_set(&cpu_count, num_online_cpus()); + cpumask_raise_softirq(&cpu_online_map, RCU_SOFTIRQ); + } + + while ( atomic_read(&cpu_count) ) + { + process_pending_softirqs(); + cpu_relax(); + } + + put_cpu_maps(); } /* Is batch a before batch b ? */ @@ -422,6 +443,13 @@ static void rcu_process_callbacks(void) rdp->process_callbacks = false; __rcu_process_callbacks(&rcu_ctrlblk, rdp); } + + if ( atomic_read(&cpu_count) && !rdp->barrier_active ) + { + rdp->barrier_active = true; + rcu_barrier_action(); + rdp->barrier_active = false; + } } static int __rcu_pending(struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp, struct rcu_data *rdp) diff --git a/xen/include/xen/rcupdate.h b/xen/include/xen/rcupdate.h index 174d058113..87f35b7704 100644 --- a/xen/include/xen/rcupdate.h +++ b/xen/include/xen/rcupdate.h @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu); void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head)); -int rcu_barrier(void); +void rcu_barrier(void); void rcu_idle_enter(unsigned int cpu); void rcu_idle_exit(unsigned int cpu);