From patchwork Mon Mar 8 12:28:40 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?b?SsO8cmdlbiBHcm/Dnw==?= X-Patchwork-Id: 12122153 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284FEC433E0 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:29:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD2E6651C9 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:29:18 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BD2E6651C9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.94857.178764 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJF0Y-0005BA-55; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 12:29:10 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 94857.178764; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 12:29:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJF0Y-0005Ay-0F; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 12:29:10 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 94857; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 12:29:08 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJF0W-0004oO-2a for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 12:29:08 +0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.15]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 121c0b45-ffb4-48f8-abdc-32a137b0aa7f; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 12:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CDDADE3; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:28:51 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 121c0b45-ffb4-48f8-abdc-32a137b0aa7f X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1615206531; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=u3YnMSkFlUp/21QNZ1kMggcxHe1yXHAkDy5ICMJL1QU=; b=YNXv3uCm5+P4OF8r75Pj3qvw5a/bZfGdICaugMYT2001NNP0vgy+3Yvt/g6oITt+sQcCfJ bRWOBUQq9sw0blJ3Qd7GZKfWo8CXn9ZBVyCjfOf1W58pXx3+q/llcvf1E3Q81iLbwVmnW4 5yJkt0s0avbsqJu9zRlFR0ThlVQ9xoo= From: Juergen Gross To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com Cc: Juergen Gross , Deep Shah , "VMware, Inc." , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers Subject: [PATCH v5 08/12] x86/paravirt: simplify paravirt macros Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:28:40 +0100 Message-Id: <20210308122844.30488-9-jgross@suse.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20210308122844.30488-1-jgross@suse.com> References: <20210308122844.30488-1-jgross@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 The central pvops call macros ____PVOP_CALL() and ____PVOP_VCALL() are looking very similar now. The main differences are using PVOP_VCALL_ARGS or PVOP_CALL_ARGS, which are identical, and the return value handling. So drop PVOP_VCALL_ARGS and instead of ____PVOP_VCALL() just use (void)____PVOP_CALL(long, ...). Note that it isn't easily possible to just redefine ____PVOP_VCALL() to use ____PVOP_CALL() instead, as this would require further hiding of commas in macro parameters. Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross --- V3: - new patch V4: - fix build warnings with clang (kernel test robot) --- arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 41 ++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h index 42f9eef84131..45bd21647dd8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h @@ -408,11 +408,9 @@ int paravirt_disable_iospace(void); * makes sure the incoming and outgoing types are always correct. */ #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 -#define PVOP_VCALL_ARGS \ +#define PVOP_CALL_ARGS \ unsigned long __eax = __eax, __edx = __edx, __ecx = __ecx; -#define PVOP_CALL_ARGS PVOP_VCALL_ARGS - #define PVOP_CALL_ARG1(x) "a" ((unsigned long)(x)) #define PVOP_CALL_ARG2(x) "d" ((unsigned long)(x)) #define PVOP_CALL_ARG3(x) "c" ((unsigned long)(x)) @@ -428,12 +426,10 @@ int paravirt_disable_iospace(void); #define VEXTRA_CLOBBERS #else /* CONFIG_X86_64 */ /* [re]ax isn't an arg, but the return val */ -#define PVOP_VCALL_ARGS \ +#define PVOP_CALL_ARGS \ unsigned long __edi = __edi, __esi = __esi, \ __edx = __edx, __ecx = __ecx, __eax = __eax; -#define PVOP_CALL_ARGS PVOP_VCALL_ARGS - #define PVOP_CALL_ARG1(x) "D" ((unsigned long)(x)) #define PVOP_CALL_ARG2(x) "S" ((unsigned long)(x)) #define PVOP_CALL_ARG3(x) "d" ((unsigned long)(x)) @@ -458,59 +454,46 @@ int paravirt_disable_iospace(void); #define PVOP_TEST_NULL(op) ((void)pv_ops.op) #endif -#define PVOP_RETMASK(rettype) \ +#define PVOP_RETVAL(rettype) \ ({ unsigned long __mask = ~0UL; \ + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(rettype) > sizeof(unsigned long)); \ switch (sizeof(rettype)) { \ case 1: __mask = 0xffUL; break; \ case 2: __mask = 0xffffUL; break; \ case 4: __mask = 0xffffffffUL; break; \ default: break; \ } \ - __mask; \ + __mask & __eax; \ }) -#define ____PVOP_CALL(rettype, op, clbr, call_clbr, extra_clbr, ...) \ +#define ____PVOP_CALL(ret, op, clbr, call_clbr, extra_clbr, ...) \ ({ \ PVOP_CALL_ARGS; \ PVOP_TEST_NULL(op); \ - BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(rettype) > sizeof(unsigned long)); \ asm volatile(paravirt_alt(PARAVIRT_CALL) \ : call_clbr, ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT \ : paravirt_type(op), \ paravirt_clobber(clbr), \ ##__VA_ARGS__ \ : "memory", "cc" extra_clbr); \ - (rettype)(__eax & PVOP_RETMASK(rettype)); \ + ret; \ }) #define __PVOP_CALL(rettype, op, ...) \ - ____PVOP_CALL(rettype, op, CLBR_ANY, PVOP_CALL_CLOBBERS, \ - EXTRA_CLOBBERS, ##__VA_ARGS__) + ____PVOP_CALL(PVOP_RETVAL(rettype), op, CLBR_ANY, \ + PVOP_CALL_CLOBBERS, EXTRA_CLOBBERS, ##__VA_ARGS__) #define __PVOP_CALLEESAVE(rettype, op, ...) \ - ____PVOP_CALL(rettype, op.func, CLBR_RET_REG, \ + ____PVOP_CALL(PVOP_RETVAL(rettype), op.func, CLBR_RET_REG, \ PVOP_CALLEE_CLOBBERS, , ##__VA_ARGS__) - -#define ____PVOP_VCALL(op, clbr, call_clbr, extra_clbr, ...) \ - ({ \ - PVOP_VCALL_ARGS; \ - PVOP_TEST_NULL(op); \ - asm volatile(paravirt_alt(PARAVIRT_CALL) \ - : call_clbr, ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT \ - : paravirt_type(op), \ - paravirt_clobber(clbr), \ - ##__VA_ARGS__ \ - : "memory", "cc" extra_clbr); \ - }) - #define __PVOP_VCALL(op, ...) \ - ____PVOP_VCALL(op, CLBR_ANY, PVOP_VCALL_CLOBBERS, \ + (void)____PVOP_CALL(, op, CLBR_ANY, PVOP_VCALL_CLOBBERS, \ VEXTRA_CLOBBERS, ##__VA_ARGS__) #define __PVOP_VCALLEESAVE(op, ...) \ - ____PVOP_VCALL(op.func, CLBR_RET_REG, \ + (void)____PVOP_CALL(, op.func, CLBR_RET_REG, \ PVOP_VCALLEE_CLOBBERS, , ##__VA_ARGS__)