Message ID | 20211124075942.2645445-4-andr2000@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | PCI devices passthrough on Arm, part 2 | expand |
Hi Oleksandr, On 24/11/2021 07:59, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com> > > In order for vPCI to work it needs to maintain guest and hardware > domain's views of the configuration space. For example, BARs and > COMMAND registers require emulation for guests and the guest view > of the registers needs to be in sync with the real contents of the > relevant registers. For that ECAM address space needs to also be > trapped for the hardware domain, so we need to implement PCI host > bridge specific callbacks to properly setup MMIO handlers for those > ranges depending on particular host bridge implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com> > --- > Since v6: > - eliminate pci_host_get_num_bridges and make pci_host_iterate_bridges > return the count > - extend comment in domain_vpci_init > - remove not yet relevant code for num MMIOs and virtual bus topology > - add extra check for has_vpci in domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers > - remove code that fixes num MMIOs for guest domain as it doesn't belong > to this patch > Since v5: > - add vpci_sbdf_from_gpa helper for gpa to SBDF translation > - take bridge's bus start into account while calculating SBDF > Since v4: > - unsigned int for functions working with count > - gate number of MMIO handlers needed for CONFIG_HAS_PCI_MSI > and fix their number, e.g. single handler for PBA and > MSI-X tables (Roger) > - re-work code for assigning MMIO handlers to be simpler > and account on the fact that there could multiple host bridges > exist for the hwdom > Since v3: > - fixed comment formatting > Since v2: > - removed unneeded assignment (count = 0) > - removed unneeded header inclusion > - update commit message > Since v1: > - Dynamically calculate the number of MMIO handlers required for vPCI > and update the total number accordingly > - s/clb/cb > - Do not introduce a new callback for MMIO handler setup > --- > xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 2 + > xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c | 17 +++++++ > xen/arch/arm/vpci.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > xen/arch/arm/vpci.h | 6 +++ > xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h | 4 ++ > 5 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c > index 96e1b235501d..92a6c509e5c5 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c > @@ -739,6 +739,8 @@ int arch_domain_create(struct domain *d, > if ( (rc = domain_vgic_register(d, &count)) != 0 ) > goto fail; > > + count += domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(d); > + > if ( (rc = domain_io_init(d, count + MAX_IO_HANDLER)) != 0 ) > goto fail; > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c > index 9653b92b5b2e..18b09d5e6f10 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c > @@ -296,6 +296,23 @@ int pci_get_host_bridge_segment(const struct dt_device_node *node, > return -EINVAL; > } > > +int pci_host_iterate_bridges_and_count(struct domain *d, > + int (*cb)(struct domain *d, > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)) > +{ > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge; > + int err, count = 0; NIT: err is only used within the loop, so I would suggest to move the declartion variable inside the loop. > + > + list_for_each_entry( bridge, &pci_host_bridges, node ) > + { > + err = cb(d, bridge); > + if ( err ) > + return err; > + count += err; Something looks wrong here. You check that err is non-zero and bail out. So err would be 0 and by extend you would always return 0 in success? > + } > + return count; > +} > + > /* > * Local variables: > * mode: C > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c > index 23f45386f4b3..ccd998d8dba2 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c > @@ -16,16 +16,31 @@ > > #include <asm/mmio.h> > > +static pci_sbdf_t vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(const struct pci_host_bridge *bridge, > + paddr_t gpa) > +{ > + pci_sbdf_t sbdf; > + > + if ( bridge ) > + { > + sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(gpa - bridge->cfg->phys_addr); > + sbdf.seg = bridge->segment; > + sbdf.bus += bridge->cfg->busn_start; > + } > + else > + sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(gpa - GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE); > + > + return sbdf; > +} > + > static int vpci_mmio_read(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info, > register_t *r, void *p) > { > - pci_sbdf_t sbdf; > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = p; > + pci_sbdf_t sbdf = vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(bridge, info->gpa); > /* data is needed to prevent a pointer cast on 32bit */ > unsigned long data; > > - /* We ignore segment part and always handle segment 0 */ > - sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(info->gpa - GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE); > - > if ( vpci_ecam_read(sbdf, ECAM_REG_OFFSET(info->gpa), > 1U << info->dabt.size, &data) ) > { > @@ -41,10 +56,8 @@ static int vpci_mmio_read(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info, > static int vpci_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info, > register_t r, void *p) > { > - pci_sbdf_t sbdf; > - > - /* We ignore segment part and always handle segment 0 */ > - sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(info->gpa - GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE); > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = p; > + pci_sbdf_t sbdf = vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(bridge, info->gpa); > > return vpci_ecam_write(sbdf, ECAM_REG_OFFSET(info->gpa), > 1U << info->dabt.size, r); > @@ -55,17 +68,67 @@ static const struct mmio_handler_ops vpci_mmio_handler = { > .write = vpci_mmio_write, > }; > > +static int vpci_setup_mmio_handler_cb(struct domain *d, > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) > +{ > + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bridge->cfg; > + > + register_mmio_handler(d, &vpci_mmio_handler, > + cfg->phys_addr, cfg->size, bridge); > + > + /* We have registered a single MMIO handler. */ > + return 1; > +} > + > int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d) > { > if ( !has_vpci(d) ) > return 0; > > + /* > + * The hardware domain gets as many MMIOs as required by the > + * physical host bridge. > + * Guests get the virtual platform layout: one virtual host bridge for now. > + */ > + if ( is_hardware_domain(d) ) > + { > + int count; > + > + count = pci_host_iterate_bridges_and_count(d, vpci_setup_mmio_handler_cb); > + if ( count < 0 ) > + return count; > + > + return 0; This could be simplified to "return (count < 0) ? count : 0;". Although my preference would be to move the guest part in an else. > + } > + > register_mmio_handler(d, &vpci_mmio_handler, > GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE, GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_SIZE, NULL); > > return 0; > } > > +static int vpci_get_num_handlers_cb(struct domain *d, > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) > +{ > + /* Each bridge has a single MMIO handler for the configuration space. */ > + return 1; > +} > + > +unsigned int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d) > +{ > + if ( !has_vpci(d) ) > + return 0; > + > + if ( is_hardware_domain(d) ) > + { > + int ret = pci_host_iterate_bridges_and_count(d, vpci_get_num_handlers_cb); > + > + return ret < 0 ? 0 : ret; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > /* > * Local variables: > * mode: C > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h > index d8a7b0e3e802..3c713f3fcdb5 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h > @@ -17,11 +17,17 @@ > > #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_VPCI > int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d); > +unsigned int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d); > #else > static inline int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d) > { > return 0; > } > + > +static inline unsigned int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > #endif > > #endif /* __ARCH_ARM_VPCI_H__ */ > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h > index c20eba643d86..4278d66e5eb9 100644 > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h > @@ -110,6 +110,10 @@ void arch_pci_init_pdev(struct pci_dev *pdev); > > int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void); > > +int pci_host_iterate_bridges_and_count(struct domain *d, > + int (*cb)(struct domain *d, > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)); > + > #else /*!CONFIG_HAS_PCI*/ > > struct arch_pci_dev { }; > Cheers,
Hi, Julien! On 08.12.21 18:48, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Oleksandr, > > On 24/11/2021 07:59, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: >> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com> >> >> In order for vPCI to work it needs to maintain guest and hardware >> domain's views of the configuration space. For example, BARs and >> COMMAND registers require emulation for guests and the guest view >> of the registers needs to be in sync with the real contents of the >> relevant registers. For that ECAM address space needs to also be >> trapped for the hardware domain, so we need to implement PCI host >> bridge specific callbacks to properly setup MMIO handlers for those >> ranges depending on particular host bridge implementation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com> >> --- >> Since v6: >> - eliminate pci_host_get_num_bridges and make pci_host_iterate_bridges >> return the count >> - extend comment in domain_vpci_init >> - remove not yet relevant code for num MMIOs and virtual bus topology >> - add extra check for has_vpci in domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers >> - remove code that fixes num MMIOs for guest domain as it doesn't belong >> to this patch >> Since v5: >> - add vpci_sbdf_from_gpa helper for gpa to SBDF translation >> - take bridge's bus start into account while calculating SBDF >> Since v4: >> - unsigned int for functions working with count >> - gate number of MMIO handlers needed for CONFIG_HAS_PCI_MSI >> and fix their number, e.g. single handler for PBA and >> MSI-X tables (Roger) >> - re-work code for assigning MMIO handlers to be simpler >> and account on the fact that there could multiple host bridges >> exist for the hwdom >> Since v3: >> - fixed comment formatting >> Since v2: >> - removed unneeded assignment (count = 0) >> - removed unneeded header inclusion >> - update commit message >> Since v1: >> - Dynamically calculate the number of MMIO handlers required for vPCI >> and update the total number accordingly >> - s/clb/cb >> - Do not introduce a new callback for MMIO handler setup >> --- >> xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 2 + >> xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c | 17 +++++++ >> xen/arch/arm/vpci.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> xen/arch/arm/vpci.h | 6 +++ >> xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h | 4 ++ >> 5 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c >> index 96e1b235501d..92a6c509e5c5 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c >> @@ -739,6 +739,8 @@ int arch_domain_create(struct domain *d, >> if ( (rc = domain_vgic_register(d, &count)) != 0 ) >> goto fail; >> + count += domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(d); >> + >> if ( (rc = domain_io_init(d, count + MAX_IO_HANDLER)) != 0 ) >> goto fail; >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c >> index 9653b92b5b2e..18b09d5e6f10 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c >> @@ -296,6 +296,23 @@ int pci_get_host_bridge_segment(const struct dt_device_node *node, >> return -EINVAL; >> } >> +int pci_host_iterate_bridges_and_count(struct domain *d, >> + int (*cb)(struct domain *d, >> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)) >> +{ >> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge; >> + int err, count = 0; > > NIT: err is only used within the loop, so I would suggest to move the declartion variable inside the loop. Yes, and it better sounds if s/err/ret > >> + >> + list_for_each_entry( bridge, &pci_host_bridges, node ) >> + { >> + err = cb(d, bridge); >> + if ( err ) >> + return err; >> + count += err; > > Something looks wrong here. You check that err is non-zero and bail out. So err would be 0 and by extend you would always return 0 in success? Indeed, I need "if ( err < 0 )" here > >> + } >> + return count; >> +} >> + >> /* >> * Local variables: >> * mode: C >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c >> index 23f45386f4b3..ccd998d8dba2 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c >> @@ -16,16 +16,31 @@ >> #include <asm/mmio.h> >> +static pci_sbdf_t vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(const struct pci_host_bridge *bridge, >> + paddr_t gpa) >> +{ >> + pci_sbdf_t sbdf; >> + >> + if ( bridge ) >> + { >> + sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(gpa - bridge->cfg->phys_addr); >> + sbdf.seg = bridge->segment; >> + sbdf.bus += bridge->cfg->busn_start; >> + } >> + else >> + sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(gpa - GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE); >> + >> + return sbdf; >> +} >> + >> static int vpci_mmio_read(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info, >> register_t *r, void *p) >> { >> - pci_sbdf_t sbdf; >> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = p; >> + pci_sbdf_t sbdf = vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(bridge, info->gpa); >> /* data is needed to prevent a pointer cast on 32bit */ >> unsigned long data; >> - /* We ignore segment part and always handle segment 0 */ >> - sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(info->gpa - GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE); >> - >> if ( vpci_ecam_read(sbdf, ECAM_REG_OFFSET(info->gpa), >> 1U << info->dabt.size, &data) ) >> { >> @@ -41,10 +56,8 @@ static int vpci_mmio_read(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info, >> static int vpci_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info, >> register_t r, void *p) >> { >> - pci_sbdf_t sbdf; >> - >> - /* We ignore segment part and always handle segment 0 */ >> - sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(info->gpa - GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE); >> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = p; >> + pci_sbdf_t sbdf = vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(bridge, info->gpa); >> return vpci_ecam_write(sbdf, ECAM_REG_OFFSET(info->gpa), >> 1U << info->dabt.size, r); >> @@ -55,17 +68,67 @@ static const struct mmio_handler_ops vpci_mmio_handler = { >> .write = vpci_mmio_write, >> }; >> +static int vpci_setup_mmio_handler_cb(struct domain *d, >> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) >> +{ >> + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bridge->cfg; >> + >> + register_mmio_handler(d, &vpci_mmio_handler, >> + cfg->phys_addr, cfg->size, bridge); >> + >> + /* We have registered a single MMIO handler. */ >> + return 1; >> +} >> + >> int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d) >> { >> if ( !has_vpci(d) ) >> return 0; >> + /* >> + * The hardware domain gets as many MMIOs as required by the >> + * physical host bridge. >> + * Guests get the virtual platform layout: one virtual host bridge for now. >> + */ >> + if ( is_hardware_domain(d) ) >> + { >> + int count; >> + >> + count = pci_host_iterate_bridges_and_count(d, vpci_setup_mmio_handler_cb); >> + if ( count < 0 ) >> + return count; >> + >> + return 0; > > This could be simplified to "return (count < 0) ? count : 0;". Although my preference would be to move the guest part in an else. Ok Thank you, Oleksandr > >> + } >> + >> register_mmio_handler(d, &vpci_mmio_handler, >> GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE, GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_SIZE, NULL); >> return 0; >> } >> +static int vpci_get_num_handlers_cb(struct domain *d, >> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) >> +{ >> + /* Each bridge has a single MMIO handler for the configuration space. */ >> + return 1; >> +} >> + >> +unsigned int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d) >> +{ >> + if ( !has_vpci(d) ) >> + return 0; >> + >> + if ( is_hardware_domain(d) ) >> + { >> + int ret = pci_host_iterate_bridges_and_count(d, vpci_get_num_handlers_cb); >> + >> + return ret < 0 ? 0 : ret; >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> /* >> * Local variables: >> * mode: C >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h >> index d8a7b0e3e802..3c713f3fcdb5 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h >> @@ -17,11 +17,17 @@ >> #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_VPCI >> int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d); >> +unsigned int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d); >> #else >> static inline int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d) >> { >> return 0; >> } >> + >> +static inline unsigned int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d) >> +{ >> + return 0; >> +} >> #endif >> #endif /* __ARCH_ARM_VPCI_H__ */ >> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h >> index c20eba643d86..4278d66e5eb9 100644 >> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h >> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h >> @@ -110,6 +110,10 @@ void arch_pci_init_pdev(struct pci_dev *pdev); >> int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void); >> +int pci_host_iterate_bridges_and_count(struct domain *d, >> + int (*cb)(struct domain *d, >> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)); >> + >> #else /*!CONFIG_HAS_PCI*/ >> struct arch_pci_dev { }; >> > > Cheers, >
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c index 96e1b235501d..92a6c509e5c5 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c @@ -739,6 +739,8 @@ int arch_domain_create(struct domain *d, if ( (rc = domain_vgic_register(d, &count)) != 0 ) goto fail; + count += domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(d); + if ( (rc = domain_io_init(d, count + MAX_IO_HANDLER)) != 0 ) goto fail; diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c index 9653b92b5b2e..18b09d5e6f10 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/pci/pci-host-common.c @@ -296,6 +296,23 @@ int pci_get_host_bridge_segment(const struct dt_device_node *node, return -EINVAL; } +int pci_host_iterate_bridges_and_count(struct domain *d, + int (*cb)(struct domain *d, + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)) +{ + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge; + int err, count = 0; + + list_for_each_entry( bridge, &pci_host_bridges, node ) + { + err = cb(d, bridge); + if ( err ) + return err; + count += err; + } + return count; +} + /* * Local variables: * mode: C diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c index 23f45386f4b3..ccd998d8dba2 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c @@ -16,16 +16,31 @@ #include <asm/mmio.h> +static pci_sbdf_t vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(const struct pci_host_bridge *bridge, + paddr_t gpa) +{ + pci_sbdf_t sbdf; + + if ( bridge ) + { + sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(gpa - bridge->cfg->phys_addr); + sbdf.seg = bridge->segment; + sbdf.bus += bridge->cfg->busn_start; + } + else + sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(gpa - GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE); + + return sbdf; +} + static int vpci_mmio_read(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info, register_t *r, void *p) { - pci_sbdf_t sbdf; + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = p; + pci_sbdf_t sbdf = vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(bridge, info->gpa); /* data is needed to prevent a pointer cast on 32bit */ unsigned long data; - /* We ignore segment part and always handle segment 0 */ - sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(info->gpa - GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE); - if ( vpci_ecam_read(sbdf, ECAM_REG_OFFSET(info->gpa), 1U << info->dabt.size, &data) ) { @@ -41,10 +56,8 @@ static int vpci_mmio_read(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info, static int vpci_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info, register_t r, void *p) { - pci_sbdf_t sbdf; - - /* We ignore segment part and always handle segment 0 */ - sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(info->gpa - GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE); + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = p; + pci_sbdf_t sbdf = vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(bridge, info->gpa); return vpci_ecam_write(sbdf, ECAM_REG_OFFSET(info->gpa), 1U << info->dabt.size, r); @@ -55,17 +68,67 @@ static const struct mmio_handler_ops vpci_mmio_handler = { .write = vpci_mmio_write, }; +static int vpci_setup_mmio_handler_cb(struct domain *d, + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) +{ + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bridge->cfg; + + register_mmio_handler(d, &vpci_mmio_handler, + cfg->phys_addr, cfg->size, bridge); + + /* We have registered a single MMIO handler. */ + return 1; +} + int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d) { if ( !has_vpci(d) ) return 0; + /* + * The hardware domain gets as many MMIOs as required by the + * physical host bridge. + * Guests get the virtual platform layout: one virtual host bridge for now. + */ + if ( is_hardware_domain(d) ) + { + int count; + + count = pci_host_iterate_bridges_and_count(d, vpci_setup_mmio_handler_cb); + if ( count < 0 ) + return count; + + return 0; + } + register_mmio_handler(d, &vpci_mmio_handler, GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE, GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_SIZE, NULL); return 0; } +static int vpci_get_num_handlers_cb(struct domain *d, + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) +{ + /* Each bridge has a single MMIO handler for the configuration space. */ + return 1; +} + +unsigned int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d) +{ + if ( !has_vpci(d) ) + return 0; + + if ( is_hardware_domain(d) ) + { + int ret = pci_host_iterate_bridges_and_count(d, vpci_get_num_handlers_cb); + + return ret < 0 ? 0 : ret; + } + + return 0; +} + /* * Local variables: * mode: C diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h index d8a7b0e3e802..3c713f3fcdb5 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h @@ -17,11 +17,17 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_VPCI int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d); +unsigned int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d); #else static inline int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d) { return 0; } + +static inline unsigned int domain_vpci_get_num_mmio_handlers(struct domain *d) +{ + return 0; +} #endif #endif /* __ARCH_ARM_VPCI_H__ */ diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h index c20eba643d86..4278d66e5eb9 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h @@ -110,6 +110,10 @@ void arch_pci_init_pdev(struct pci_dev *pdev); int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void); +int pci_host_iterate_bridges_and_count(struct domain *d, + int (*cb)(struct domain *d, + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)); + #else /*!CONFIG_HAS_PCI*/ struct arch_pci_dev { };