From patchwork Wed Aug 17 02:06:47 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jiamei Xie X-Patchwork-Id: 12945424 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D338BC25B0E for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 02:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.388586.625280 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oO8St-0006Bf-2f; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 02:07:27 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 388586.625280; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 02:07:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oO8Ss-0006BY-W7; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 02:07:26 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 388586; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 02:07:26 +0000 Received: from se1-gles-sth1-in.inumbo.com ([159.253.27.254] helo=se1-gles-sth1.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oO8Ss-0005tw-9i for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 02:07:26 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by se1-gles-sth1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTP id 560eeef4-1dd1-11ed-bd2e-47488cf2e6aa; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 04:07:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F013B113E; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 19:07:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ais-sh-xeon.shanghai.arm.com (unknown [10.169.212.215]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 059CC3F67D; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 19:07:20 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 560eeef4-1dd1-11ed-bd2e-47488cf2e6aa From: jiaxie01 To: jiamei.xie@arm.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Julien Grall , Wei Liu , Anthony PERARD , Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini , Julien Grall , Bertrand Marquis , Volodymyr Babchuk , Oleksandr Tyshchenko Subject: [PATCH 02/16] libxl: Introduce basic virtio-mmio support on Arm Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 10:06:47 +0800 Message-Id: <20220817020701.27379-2-jiamei.xie@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220817020701.27379-1-jiamei.xie@arm.com> References: <20220817020701.27379-1-jiamei.xie@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Julien Grall This patch introduces helpers to allocate Virtio MMIO params (IRQ and memory region) and create specific device node in the Guest device-tree with allocated params. In order to deal with multiple Virtio devices, reserve corresponding ranges. For now, we reserve 1MB for memory regions and 10 SPIs. As these helpers should be used for every Virtio device attached to the Guest, call them for Virtio disk(s). Please note, with statically allocated Virtio IRQs there is a risk of a clash with a physical IRQs of passthrough devices. For the first version, it's fine, but we should consider allocating the Virtio IRQs automatically. Thankfully, we know in advance which IRQs will be used for passthrough to be able to choose non-clashed ones. Signed-off-by: Julien Grall Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini Reviewed-by: Anthony PERARD --- Please note, this is a split/cleanup/hardening of Julien's PoC: "Add support for Guest IO forwarding to a device emulator" Changes RFC -> V1: - was squashed with: "[RFC PATCH V1 09/12] libxl: Handle virtio-mmio irq in more correct way" "[RFC PATCH V1 11/12] libxl: Insert "dma-coherent" property into virtio-mmio device node" "[RFC PATCH V1 12/12] libxl: Fix duplicate memory node in DT" - move VirtIO MMIO #define-s to xen/include/public/arch-arm.h Changes V1 -> V2: - update the author of a patch Changes V2 -> V3: - no changes Changes V3 -> V4: - no changes Changes V4 -> V5: - split the changes, change the order of the patches - drop an extra "virtio" configuration option - update patch description - use CONTAINER_OF instead of own implementation - reserve ranges for Virtio MMIO params and put them in correct location - create helpers to allocate Virtio MMIO params, add corresponding sanity-сhecks - add comment why MMIO size 0x200 is chosen - update debug print - drop Wei's T-b Changes V5 -> V6: - rebase on current staging Changes V6 -> V7: - rebase on current staging - add T-b and R-b tags - update according to the recent changes to "libxl: Add support for Virtio disk configuration" Changes V7 -> V8: - drop T-b and R-b tags - make virtio_mmio_base/irq global variables to be local in libxl__arch_domain_prepare_config() and initialize them at the beginning of the function, then rework alloc_virtio_mmio_base/irq() to take a pointer to virtio_mmio_base/irq variables as an argument - update according to the recent changes to "libxl: Add support for Virtio disk configuration" Changes V8 -> V9: - Stefano already gave his Reviewed-by, I dropped it due to the changes - remove the second set of parentheses for check in alloc_virtio_mmio_base() - clarify the updating of "nr_spis" right after num_disks loop in libxl__arch_domain_prepare_config() and add a comment on top of it - use GCSPRINTF() instead of using a buffer of a static size calculated by hand in make_virtio_mmio_node() Changes V9 -> V10: - add Stefano's and Anthony's R-b --- --- tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- xen/include/public/arch-arm.h | 7 ++ 2 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c b/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c index eef1de0939..9be9b2a2d1 100644 --- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c +++ b/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c @@ -8,6 +8,46 @@ #include #include +/* + * There is no clear requirements for the total size of Virtio MMIO region. + * The size of control registers is 0x100 and device-specific configuration + * registers starts at the offset 0x100, however it's size depends on the device + * and the driver. Pick the biggest known size at the moment to cover most + * of the devices (also consider allowing the user to configure the size via + * config file for the one not conforming with the proposed value). + */ +#define VIRTIO_MMIO_DEV_SIZE xen_mk_ullong(0x200) + +static uint64_t alloc_virtio_mmio_base(libxl__gc *gc, uint64_t *virtio_mmio_base) +{ + uint64_t base = *virtio_mmio_base; + + /* Make sure we have enough reserved resources */ + if (base + VIRTIO_MMIO_DEV_SIZE > + GUEST_VIRTIO_MMIO_BASE + GUEST_VIRTIO_MMIO_SIZE) { + LOG(ERROR, "Ran out of reserved range for Virtio MMIO BASE 0x%"PRIx64"\n", + base); + return 0; + } + *virtio_mmio_base += VIRTIO_MMIO_DEV_SIZE; + + return base; +} + +static uint32_t alloc_virtio_mmio_irq(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t *virtio_mmio_irq) +{ + uint32_t irq = *virtio_mmio_irq; + + /* Make sure we have enough reserved resources */ + if (irq > GUEST_VIRTIO_MMIO_SPI_LAST) { + LOG(ERROR, "Ran out of reserved range for Virtio MMIO IRQ %u\n", irq); + return 0; + } + (*virtio_mmio_irq)++; + + return irq; +} + static const char *gicv_to_string(libxl_gic_version gic_version) { switch (gic_version) { @@ -26,8 +66,10 @@ int libxl__arch_domain_prepare_config(libxl__gc *gc, { uint32_t nr_spis = 0; unsigned int i; - uint32_t vuart_irq; - bool vuart_enabled = false; + uint32_t vuart_irq, virtio_irq = 0; + bool vuart_enabled = false, virtio_enabled = false; + uint64_t virtio_mmio_base = GUEST_VIRTIO_MMIO_BASE; + uint32_t virtio_mmio_irq = GUEST_VIRTIO_MMIO_SPI_FIRST; /* * If pl011 vuart is enabled then increment the nr_spis to allow allocation @@ -39,6 +81,35 @@ int libxl__arch_domain_prepare_config(libxl__gc *gc, vuart_enabled = true; } + for (i = 0; i < d_config->num_disks; i++) { + libxl_device_disk *disk = &d_config->disks[i]; + + if (disk->specification == LIBXL_DISK_SPECIFICATION_VIRTIO) { + disk->base = alloc_virtio_mmio_base(gc, &virtio_mmio_base); + if (!disk->base) + return ERROR_FAIL; + + disk->irq = alloc_virtio_mmio_irq(gc, &virtio_mmio_irq); + if (!disk->irq) + return ERROR_FAIL; + + if (virtio_irq < disk->irq) + virtio_irq = disk->irq; + virtio_enabled = true; + + LOG(DEBUG, "Allocate Virtio MMIO params for Vdev %s: IRQ %u BASE 0x%"PRIx64, + disk->vdev, disk->irq, disk->base); + } + } + + /* + * Every virtio-mmio device uses one emulated SPI. If Virtio devices are + * present, make sure that we allocate enough SPIs for them. + * The resulting "nr_spis" needs to cover the highest possible SPI. + */ + if (virtio_enabled) + nr_spis = max(nr_spis, virtio_irq - 32 + 1); + for (i = 0; i < d_config->b_info.num_irqs; i++) { uint32_t irq = d_config->b_info.irqs[i]; uint32_t spi; @@ -58,6 +129,13 @@ int libxl__arch_domain_prepare_config(libxl__gc *gc, return ERROR_FAIL; } + /* The same check as for vpl011 */ + if (virtio_enabled && + (irq >= GUEST_VIRTIO_MMIO_SPI_FIRST && irq <= virtio_irq)) { + LOG(ERROR, "Physical IRQ %u conflicting with Virtio MMIO IRQ range\n", irq); + return ERROR_FAIL; + } + if (irq < 32) continue; @@ -787,6 +865,37 @@ static int make_vpci_node(libxl__gc *gc, void *fdt, return 0; } + +static int make_virtio_mmio_node(libxl__gc *gc, void *fdt, + uint64_t base, uint32_t irq) +{ + int res; + gic_interrupt intr; + const char *name = GCSPRINTF("virtio@%"PRIx64, base); + + res = fdt_begin_node(fdt, name); + if (res) return res; + + res = fdt_property_compat(gc, fdt, 1, "virtio,mmio"); + if (res) return res; + + res = fdt_property_regs(gc, fdt, GUEST_ROOT_ADDRESS_CELLS, GUEST_ROOT_SIZE_CELLS, + 1, base, VIRTIO_MMIO_DEV_SIZE); + if (res) return res; + + set_interrupt(intr, irq, 0xf, DT_IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING); + res = fdt_property_interrupts(gc, fdt, &intr, 1); + if (res) return res; + + res = fdt_property(fdt, "dma-coherent", NULL, 0); + if (res) return res; + + res = fdt_end_node(fdt); + if (res) return res; + + return 0; +} + static const struct arch_info *get_arch_info(libxl__gc *gc, const struct xc_dom_image *dom) { @@ -988,6 +1097,7 @@ static int libxl__prepare_dtb(libxl__gc *gc, libxl_domain_config *d_config, size_t fdt_size = 0; int pfdt_size = 0; libxl_domain_build_info *const info = &d_config->b_info; + unsigned int i; const libxl_version_info *vers; const struct arch_info *ainfo; @@ -1094,6 +1204,13 @@ next_resize: if (d_config->num_pcidevs) FDT( make_vpci_node(gc, fdt, ainfo, dom) ); + for (i = 0; i < d_config->num_disks; i++) { + libxl_device_disk *disk = &d_config->disks[i]; + + if (disk->specification == LIBXL_DISK_SPECIFICATION_VIRTIO) + FDT( make_virtio_mmio_node(gc, fdt, disk->base, disk->irq) ); + } + if (pfdt) FDT( copy_partial_fdt(gc, fdt, pfdt) ); diff --git a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h index ab05fe12b0..c8b6058d3a 100644 --- a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h @@ -407,6 +407,10 @@ typedef uint64_t xen_callback_t; /* Physical Address Space */ +/* Virtio MMIO mappings */ +#define GUEST_VIRTIO_MMIO_BASE xen_mk_ullong(0x02000000) +#define GUEST_VIRTIO_MMIO_SIZE xen_mk_ullong(0x00100000) + /* * vGIC mappings: Only one set of mapping is used by the guest. * Therefore they can overlap. @@ -493,6 +497,9 @@ typedef uint64_t xen_callback_t; #define GUEST_VPL011_SPI 32 +#define GUEST_VIRTIO_MMIO_SPI_FIRST 33 +#define GUEST_VIRTIO_MMIO_SPI_LAST 43 + /* PSCI functions */ #define PSCI_cpu_suspend 0 #define PSCI_cpu_off 1