Message ID | 20221207061537.7266-6-vikram.garhwal@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | dynamic node programming using overlay dtbo | expand |
Hi Vikram, On 07/12/2022 07:15, Vikram Garhwal wrote: > > > Add _dt_find_by_path() to find a matching node with path for a dt_device_node. Here and in commit title you say _dt_find_by_path but you introduce device_tree_find_node_by_path. Also, it would be beneficial to state why such change is needed. > > Signed-off-by: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garhwal@amd.com> > --- > xen/common/device_tree.c | 5 +++-- > xen/include/xen/device_tree.h | 16 ++++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/common/device_tree.c b/xen/common/device_tree.c > index 6518eff9b0..acf26a411d 100644 > --- a/xen/common/device_tree.c > +++ b/xen/common/device_tree.c > @@ -358,11 +358,12 @@ struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_type(struct dt_device_node *from, > return np; > } > > -struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_path(const char *path) > +struct dt_device_node *device_tree_find_node_by_path(struct dt_device_node *dt, > + const char *path) > { > struct dt_device_node *np; > > - dt_for_each_device_node(dt_host, np) > + dt_for_each_device_node(dt, np) > if ( np->full_name && (dt_node_cmp(np->full_name, path) == 0) ) > break; > > diff --git a/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h b/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h > index bde46d7120..51e251b0b4 100644 > --- a/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h > +++ b/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h > @@ -537,13 +537,25 @@ struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_type(struct dt_device_node *from, > struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_alias(const char *alias); > > /** > - * dt_find_node_by_path - Find a node matching a full DT path > + * device_tree_find_node_by_path - Find a node matching a full DT path This description and ... > + * @dt_node: The device tree to search > * @path: The full path to match > * > * Returns a node pointer. > */ > -struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_path(const char *path); > +struct dt_device_node *device_tree_find_node_by_path(struct dt_device_node *dt, > + const char *path); > > +/** > + * dt_find_node_by_path - Find a node matching a full DT path ... this are identical. I think you should describe the difference. The function names are also very similar and can be confused but I won't oppose it. I will leave the decision to maintainers. > + * @path: The full path to match > + * > + * Returns a node pointer. > + */ > +static inline struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_path(const char *path) > +{ > + return device_tree_find_node_by_path(dt_host, path); > +} > > /** > * dt_find_node_by_gpath - Same as dt_find_node_by_path but retrieve the > -- > 2.17.1 > > ~Michal
diff --git a/xen/common/device_tree.c b/xen/common/device_tree.c index 6518eff9b0..acf26a411d 100644 --- a/xen/common/device_tree.c +++ b/xen/common/device_tree.c @@ -358,11 +358,12 @@ struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_type(struct dt_device_node *from, return np; } -struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_path(const char *path) +struct dt_device_node *device_tree_find_node_by_path(struct dt_device_node *dt, + const char *path) { struct dt_device_node *np; - dt_for_each_device_node(dt_host, np) + dt_for_each_device_node(dt, np) if ( np->full_name && (dt_node_cmp(np->full_name, path) == 0) ) break; diff --git a/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h b/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h index bde46d7120..51e251b0b4 100644 --- a/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h +++ b/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h @@ -537,13 +537,25 @@ struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_type(struct dt_device_node *from, struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_alias(const char *alias); /** - * dt_find_node_by_path - Find a node matching a full DT path + * device_tree_find_node_by_path - Find a node matching a full DT path + * @dt_node: The device tree to search * @path: The full path to match * * Returns a node pointer. */ -struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_path(const char *path); +struct dt_device_node *device_tree_find_node_by_path(struct dt_device_node *dt, + const char *path); +/** + * dt_find_node_by_path - Find a node matching a full DT path + * @path: The full path to match + * + * Returns a node pointer. + */ +static inline struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_path(const char *path) +{ + return device_tree_find_node_by_path(dt_host, path); +} /** * dt_find_node_by_gpath - Same as dt_find_node_by_path but retrieve the
Add _dt_find_by_path() to find a matching node with path for a dt_device_node. Signed-off-by: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garhwal@amd.com> --- xen/common/device_tree.c | 5 +++-- xen/include/xen/device_tree.h | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)