From patchwork Wed May 31 21:30:32 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Vishal Moola X-Patchwork-Id: 13262736 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34944C7EE23 for ; Wed, 31 May 2023 21:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.542072.845609 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q4TVq-0000bR-6J; Wed, 31 May 2023 21:37:46 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 542072.845609; Wed, 31 May 2023 21:37:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q4TVp-0000XS-JT; Wed, 31 May 2023 21:37:45 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 542072; Wed, 31 May 2023 21:37:44 +0000 Received: from se1-gles-flk1-in.inumbo.com ([94.247.172.50] helo=se1-gles-flk1.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q4TQZ-0006zB-KG for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 31 May 2023 21:32:19 +0000 Received: from mail-yw1-x112a.google.com (mail-yw1-x112a.google.com [2607:f8b0:4864:20::112a]) by se1-gles-flk1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 9dbb48c1-fffa-11ed-8611-37d641c3527e; Wed, 31 May 2023 23:32:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-yw1-x112a.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-565c3aa9e82so788977b3.2 for ; Wed, 31 May 2023 14:32:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknowna0e70b2ca394.attlocal.net ([2600:1700:2f7d:1800::46]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t63-20020a0dd142000000b0055aafcef659sm658905ywd.5.2023.05.31.14.32.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 31 May 2023 14:32:16 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 9dbb48c1-fffa-11ed-8611-37d641c3527e DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1685568736; x=1688160736; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=0GxeAY3mx9RNm+XPUbEc94ZOjIpLa+PLxcZvSX9iQwI=; b=L93fUoh1n2yrqqKzpBnTktVcBXm2pCKywXktnW0z1yiLQvKxqvmxEchYgF8OV+6QTv 0bzTf1A4OlAuxa/9dZerxpZsbwsI4TjqwMyAQcFuTYSuZJaeWyYJuEWFU5GYKhF/PssT BviFKPz7vL/Fi2iPZINEIUsA7v2Occp7X58VFjDz42JLNThFo7xdGCGk1w6ybVnEIlHs b72Ur/xMHtdJmjaw3M4Bie9pileXuOl23g9fXNIiRCDxPyqPbOwfW5Xk2DEao1nEkBYA Y/k6knxGTbApmWF3bdrPaXzT+XUQklhHF/wdKHs0p7V2Zyj9EYf6Jf8ACh3np5J3xStV TZFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685568736; x=1688160736; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0GxeAY3mx9RNm+XPUbEc94ZOjIpLa+PLxcZvSX9iQwI=; b=N81WaI8N2rGQz4tjvXC8STFMsc5toW8/Rg/xuTdzkeJiaQhu8pR8iO5zp9JRkVww39 8FKuRzZO3n1k4RrP5TIuxjL+A50DpFyme+4nsE3tqZ9fKyIrTSZnvLIR6WLiFG+9LseS WFUEXChglithDOdyZkxDPzIiPx3ZbsYSFp8YclzlEo80WthFFvsr+7FgjZdBX+yLazwN nVskcvXZyi1dI8g8k4Zo4EDh8CV10hTU9WjH2rTWIoR6HXAJcqInkY0TGpuiXNiB0OYm 9WrMa02A4Z9MrBaUvVHizYy/LbPdBTXBTWdC511jDjaqXwWrJIM7AtaQRwCrqiPnY6za b+nA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzLWTMTU/cvZZCiAgncLU/43qh62Zws8cmPTRwJ1uTLIPLvfSa+ Xlv55jp12faArA6Ts6ZfURk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5gNCrFPXlbEmiVTeSbnpNfi3te/9mQ7ozGamtiEd+qz1ysxTVS5h/CUcEwYIfry/bpNOrmaQ== X-Received: by 2002:a81:4f13:0:b0:565:ee73:7711 with SMTP id d19-20020a814f13000000b00565ee737711mr6829660ywb.46.1685568736548; Wed, 31 May 2023 14:32:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" To: Andrew Morton , Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-openrisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" Subject: [PATCH v3 34/34] mm: Remove pgtable_{pmd, pte}_page_{ctor, dtor}() wrappers Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 14:30:32 -0700 Message-Id: <20230531213032.25338-35-vishal.moola@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 In-Reply-To: <20230531213032.25338-1-vishal.moola@gmail.com> References: <20230531213032.25338-1-vishal.moola@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 These functions are no longer necessary. Remove them and cleanup Documentation referencing them. Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) --- Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst | 12 +++++------ .../zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst | 14 ++++++------- include/linux/mm.h | 20 ------------------- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst b/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst index 50ee0dfc95be..4bffec728340 100644 --- a/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst +++ b/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Support of split page table lock by an architecture =================================================== There's no need in special enabling of PTE split page table lock: everything -required is done by pgtable_pte_page_ctor() and pgtable_pte_page_dtor(), which +required is done by pagetable_pte_ctor() and pagetable_pte_dtor(), which must be called on PTE table allocation / freeing. Make sure the architecture doesn't use slab allocator for page table @@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ This field shares storage with page->ptl. PMD split lock only makes sense if you have more than two page table levels. -PMD split lock enabling requires pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() call on PMD table -allocation and pgtable_pmd_page_dtor() on freeing. +PMD split lock enabling requires pagetable_pmd_ctor() call on PMD table +allocation and pagetable_pmd_dtor() on freeing. Allocation usually happens in pmd_alloc_one(), freeing in pmd_free() and pmd_free_tlb(), but make sure you cover all PMD table allocation / freeing @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ paths: i.e X86_PAE preallocate few PMDs on pgd_alloc(). With everything in place you can set CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK. -NOTE: pgtable_pte_page_ctor() and pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() can fail -- it must +NOTE: pagetable_pte_ctor() and pagetable_pmd_ctor() can fail -- it must be handled properly. page->ptl @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ trick: split lock with enabled DEBUG_SPINLOCK or DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC, but costs one more cache line for indirect access; -The spinlock_t allocated in pgtable_pte_page_ctor() for PTE table and in -pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() for PMD table. +The spinlock_t allocated in pagetable_pte_ctor() for PTE table and in +pagetable_pmd_ctor() for PMD table. Please, never access page->ptl directly -- use appropriate helper. diff --git a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst index 4fb7aa666037..a2c288670a24 100644 --- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst +++ b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst @@ -56,16 +56,16 @@ Hugetlb特定的辅助函数: 架构对分页表锁的支持 ==================== -没有必要特别启用PTE分页表锁：所有需要的东西都由pgtable_pte_page_ctor() -和pgtable_pte_page_dtor()完成，它们必须在PTE表分配/释放时被调用。 +没有必要特别启用PTE分页表锁：所有需要的东西都由pagetable_pte_ctor() +和pagetable_pte_dtor()完成，它们必须在PTE表分配/释放时被调用。 确保架构不使用slab分配器来分配页表：slab使用page->slab_cache来分配其页 面。这个区域与page->ptl共享存储。 PMD分页锁只有在你有两个以上的页表级别时才有意义。 -启用PMD分页锁需要在PMD表分配时调用pgtable_pmd_page_ctor()，在释放时调 -用pgtable_pmd_page_dtor()。 +启用PMD分页锁需要在PMD表分配时调用pagetable_pmd_ctor()，在释放时调 +用pagetable_pmd_dtor()。 分配通常发生在pmd_alloc_one()中，释放发生在pmd_free()和pmd_free_tlb() 中，但要确保覆盖所有的PMD表分配/释放路径：即X86_PAE在pgd_alloc()中预先 @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ PMD分页锁只有在你有两个以上的页表级别时才有意义。 一切就绪后，你可以设置CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK。 -注意：pgtable_pte_page_ctor()和pgtable_pmd_page_ctor()可能失败--必 +注意：pagetable_pte_ctor()和pagetable_pmd_ctor()可能失败--必 须正确处理。 page->ptl @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ page->ptl用于访问分割页表锁，其中'page'是包含该表的页面struc 的指针并动态分配它。这允许在启用DEBUG_SPINLOCK或DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC的 情况下使用分页锁，但由于间接访问而多花了一个缓存行。 -PTE表的spinlock_t分配在pgtable_pte_page_ctor()中，PMD表的spinlock_t -分配在pgtable_pmd_page_ctor()中。 +PTE表的spinlock_t分配在pagetable_pte_ctor()中，PMD表的spinlock_t +分配在pagetable_pmd_ctor()中。 请不要直接访问page->ptl - -使用适当的辅助函数。 diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 2c7d27348ea9..218cad2041a6 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -2878,11 +2878,6 @@ static inline bool pagetable_pte_ctor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) return true; } -static inline bool pgtable_pte_page_ctor(struct page *page) -{ - return pagetable_pte_ctor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - static inline void pagetable_pte_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) { struct folio *folio = ptdesc_folio(ptdesc); @@ -2892,11 +2887,6 @@ static inline void pagetable_pte_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) lruvec_stat_sub_folio(folio, NR_PAGETABLE); } -static inline void pgtable_pte_page_dtor(struct page *page) -{ - pagetable_pte_dtor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - #define pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, ptlp) \ ({ \ spinlock_t *__ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd); \ @@ -2987,11 +2977,6 @@ static inline bool pagetable_pmd_ctor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) return true; } -static inline bool pgtable_pmd_page_ctor(struct page *page) -{ - return pagetable_pmd_ctor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - static inline void pagetable_pmd_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) { struct folio *folio = ptdesc_folio(ptdesc); @@ -3001,11 +2986,6 @@ static inline void pagetable_pmd_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) lruvec_stat_sub_folio(folio, NR_PAGETABLE); } -static inline void pgtable_pmd_page_dtor(struct page *page) -{ - pagetable_pmd_dtor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - /* * No scalability reason to split PUD locks yet, but follow the same pattern * as the PMD locks to make it easier if we decide to. The VM should not be