Message ID | 20230819002850.32349-6-vikram.garhwal@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | dynamic node programming using overlay dtbo | expand |
Hi Vikram, On 19/08/2023 01:28, Vikram Garhwal wrote: > Introduce a config option where the user can enable support for adding/removing > device tree nodes using a device tree binary overlay. > > Update SUPPORT.md and CHANGELOG.md to state the Device Tree Overlays support for > Arm. > > Signed-off-by: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garhwal@amd.com> > Acked-by: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@arm.com> > Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@amd.com> > > --- > Changes from v7: > Add this feature as "experimental support" in CHANGELOG.md > --- > --- > CHANGELOG.md | 3 ++- > SUPPORT.md | 6 ++++++ > xen/arch/arm/Kconfig | 5 +++++ > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md > index 7d7e0590f8..47098dbfca 100644 > --- a/CHANGELOG.md > +++ b/CHANGELOG.md > @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/) > - xl/libxl can customize SMBIOS strings for HVM guests. > - Add support for AVX512-FP16 on x86. > - On Arm, Xen supports guests running SVE/SVE2 instructions. (Tech Preview) > - > + - On Arm, experimental support for dynamic addition/removal of Xen device tree > + nodes using a device tree overlay binary(.dtbo). Typo: missing space before (. > > ## [4.17.0](https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=shortlog;h=RELEASE-4.17.0) - 2022-12-12 > > diff --git a/SUPPORT.md b/SUPPORT.md > index 35a6249e03..8eb006565c 100644 > --- a/SUPPORT.md > +++ b/SUPPORT.md > @@ -844,6 +844,12 @@ No support for QEMU backends in a 16K or 64K domain. > > Status: Supported > > +### Device Tree Overlays > + > +Add/Remove device tree nodes using a device tree overlay binary(.dtbo). Same here. I don't suggest to handle it on commit because this is not something I want to merge without the rest of the series. > + > + Status, ARM: Experimental > + > ### ARM: Guest ACPI support > > Status: Supported > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig > index fd57a82dd2..02c4796438 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig > @@ -92,6 +92,11 @@ config HAS_ITS > bool "GICv3 ITS MSI controller support (UNSUPPORTED)" if UNSUPPORTED > depends on GICV3 && !NEW_VGIC && !ARM_32 > > +config OVERLAY_DTB > + bool "DTB overlay support (UNSUPPORTED)" if UNSUPPORTED > + help > + Dynamic addition/removal of Xen device tree nodes using a dtbo. Do we have any documentation in the tree of the limitations and how this works? The reason I am asking is the wording here suggests that it would be possible to remove nodes from the original Device-Tree. AFAIU this is not possible with the implementation and you are not planning to handle it. Correct? Cheers,
Hi Julien, On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 08:10:05PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Vikram, > > On 19/08/2023 01:28, Vikram Garhwal wrote: > > Introduce a config option where the user can enable support for adding/removing > > device tree nodes using a device tree binary overlay. > > > > Update SUPPORT.md and CHANGELOG.md to state the Device Tree Overlays support for > > Arm. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garhwal@amd.com> > > Acked-by: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@arm.com> > > Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@amd.com> > > > > --- > > Changes from v7: > > Add this feature as "experimental support" in CHANGELOG.md > > --- > > --- > > CHANGELOG.md | 3 ++- > > SUPPORT.md | 6 ++++++ > > xen/arch/arm/Kconfig | 5 +++++ > > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md > > index 7d7e0590f8..47098dbfca 100644 > > --- a/CHANGELOG.md > > +++ b/CHANGELOG.md > > @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/) > > - xl/libxl can customize SMBIOS strings for HVM guests. > > - Add support for AVX512-FP16 on x86. > > - On Arm, Xen supports guests running SVE/SVE2 instructions. (Tech Preview) > > - > > + - On Arm, experimental support for dynamic addition/removal of Xen device tree > > + nodes using a device tree overlay binary(.dtbo). > > Typo: missing space before (. > > > ## [4.17.0](https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=shortlog;h=RELEASE-4.17.0) - 2022-12-12 > > diff --git a/SUPPORT.md b/SUPPORT.md > > index 35a6249e03..8eb006565c 100644 > > --- a/SUPPORT.md > > +++ b/SUPPORT.md > > @@ -844,6 +844,12 @@ No support for QEMU backends in a 16K or 64K domain. > > Status: Supported > > +### Device Tree Overlays > > + > > +Add/Remove device tree nodes using a device tree overlay binary(.dtbo). > > Same here. I don't suggest to handle it on commit because this is not > something I want to merge without the rest of the series. > > > + > > + Status, ARM: Experimental > > + > > ### ARM: Guest ACPI support > > Status: Supported > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig > > index fd57a82dd2..02c4796438 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig > > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig > > @@ -92,6 +92,11 @@ config HAS_ITS > > bool "GICv3 ITS MSI controller support (UNSUPPORTED)" if UNSUPPORTED > > depends on GICV3 && !NEW_VGIC && !ARM_32 > > +config OVERLAY_DTB > > + bool "DTB overlay support (UNSUPPORTED)" if UNSUPPORTED > > + help > > + Dynamic addition/removal of Xen device tree nodes using a dtbo. > > Do we have any documentation in the tree of the limitations and how this > works? > > The reason I am asking is the wording here suggests that it would be > possible to remove nodes from the original Device-Tree. AFAIU this is not > possible with the implementation and you are not planning to handle it. > Correct? Yes, that is correct. This series doesn't remove the nodes which are not added by overlay before. I will add a document file. Is this needs to be in .pandoc or .txt format? > > Cheers, > > -- > Julien Grall
On 25/08/2023 04:17, Vikram Garhwal wrote: > Hi Julien, > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 08:10:05PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi Vikram, >> >> On 19/08/2023 01:28, Vikram Garhwal wrote: >>> Introduce a config option where the user can enable support for adding/removing >>> device tree nodes using a device tree binary overlay. >>> >>> Update SUPPORT.md and CHANGELOG.md to state the Device Tree Overlays support for >>> Arm. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garhwal@amd.com> >>> Acked-by: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@arm.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@amd.com> >>> >>> --- >>> Changes from v7: >>> Add this feature as "experimental support" in CHANGELOG.md >>> --- >>> --- >>> CHANGELOG.md | 3 ++- >>> SUPPORT.md | 6 ++++++ >>> xen/arch/arm/Kconfig | 5 +++++ >>> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md >>> index 7d7e0590f8..47098dbfca 100644 >>> --- a/CHANGELOG.md >>> +++ b/CHANGELOG.md >>> @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/) >>> - xl/libxl can customize SMBIOS strings for HVM guests. >>> - Add support for AVX512-FP16 on x86. >>> - On Arm, Xen supports guests running SVE/SVE2 instructions. (Tech Preview) >>> - >>> + - On Arm, experimental support for dynamic addition/removal of Xen device tree >>> + nodes using a device tree overlay binary(.dtbo). >> >> Typo: missing space before (. >> >>> ## [4.17.0](https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=shortlog;h=RELEASE-4.17.0) - 2022-12-12 >>> diff --git a/SUPPORT.md b/SUPPORT.md >>> index 35a6249e03..8eb006565c 100644 >>> --- a/SUPPORT.md >>> +++ b/SUPPORT.md >>> @@ -844,6 +844,12 @@ No support for QEMU backends in a 16K or 64K domain. >>> Status: Supported >>> +### Device Tree Overlays >>> + >>> +Add/Remove device tree nodes using a device tree overlay binary(.dtbo). >> >> Same here. I don't suggest to handle it on commit because this is not >> something I want to merge without the rest of the series. >> >>> + >>> + Status, ARM: Experimental >>> + >>> ### ARM: Guest ACPI support >>> Status: Supported >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig >>> index fd57a82dd2..02c4796438 100644 >>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig >>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig >>> @@ -92,6 +92,11 @@ config HAS_ITS >>> bool "GICv3 ITS MSI controller support (UNSUPPORTED)" if UNSUPPORTED >>> depends on GICV3 && !NEW_VGIC && !ARM_32 >>> +config OVERLAY_DTB >>> + bool "DTB overlay support (UNSUPPORTED)" if UNSUPPORTED >>> + help >>> + Dynamic addition/removal of Xen device tree nodes using a dtbo. >> >> Do we have any documentation in the tree of the limitations and how this >> works? >> >> The reason I am asking is the wording here suggests that it would be >> possible to remove nodes from the original Device-Tree. AFAIU this is not >> possible with the implementation and you are not planning to handle it. >> Correct? > Yes, that is correct. This series doesn't remove the nodes which are not added > by overlay before. > > I will add a document file. Is this needs to be in .pandoc or .txt format? I think we now prefer .pandoc. Cheers,
diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md index 7d7e0590f8..47098dbfca 100644 --- a/CHANGELOG.md +++ b/CHANGELOG.md @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/) - xl/libxl can customize SMBIOS strings for HVM guests. - Add support for AVX512-FP16 on x86. - On Arm, Xen supports guests running SVE/SVE2 instructions. (Tech Preview) - + - On Arm, experimental support for dynamic addition/removal of Xen device tree + nodes using a device tree overlay binary(.dtbo). ## [4.17.0](https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=shortlog;h=RELEASE-4.17.0) - 2022-12-12 diff --git a/SUPPORT.md b/SUPPORT.md index 35a6249e03..8eb006565c 100644 --- a/SUPPORT.md +++ b/SUPPORT.md @@ -844,6 +844,12 @@ No support for QEMU backends in a 16K or 64K domain. Status: Supported +### Device Tree Overlays + +Add/Remove device tree nodes using a device tree overlay binary(.dtbo). + + Status, ARM: Experimental + ### ARM: Guest ACPI support Status: Supported diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig index fd57a82dd2..02c4796438 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig +++ b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig @@ -92,6 +92,11 @@ config HAS_ITS bool "GICv3 ITS MSI controller support (UNSUPPORTED)" if UNSUPPORTED depends on GICV3 && !NEW_VGIC && !ARM_32 +config OVERLAY_DTB + bool "DTB overlay support (UNSUPPORTED)" if UNSUPPORTED + help + Dynamic addition/removal of Xen device tree nodes using a dtbo. + config HVM def_bool y