Message ID | 20240523074040.1611264-5-xin.wang2@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Remaining patches for dynamic node programming using overlay dtbo | expand |
Hi Henry, On 23/05/2024 08:40, Henry Wang wrote: > Currently, adding physical interrupts are only allowed at > the domain creation time. For use cases such as dynamic device > tree overlay addition, the adding of physical IRQ to > running domains should be allowed. > > Drop the above-mentioned domain creation check. Since this > will introduce interrupt state unsync issues for cases when the > interrupt is active or pending in the guest, therefore for these > cases we simply reject the operation. Do it for both new and old > vGIC implementations. > > Signed-off-by: Henry Wang <xin.wang2@amd.com> With one remark below: Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c > index b9463a5f27..048e12c562 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c > @@ -876,8 +876,11 @@ int vgic_connect_hw_irq(struct domain *d, struct vcpu *vcpu, > > if ( connect ) /* assign a mapped IRQ */ > { > - /* The VIRQ should not be already enabled by the guest */ > - if ( !irq->hw && !irq->enabled ) > + /* > + * The VIRQ should not be already enabled by the guest nor > + * active/pending in the guest Typo: Missing full stop. It can be fixed on commit. > + */ > + if ( !irq->hw && !irq->enabled && !irq->active && !irq->pending_latch ) > { > irq->hw = true; > irq->hwintid = desc->irq; Cheers,
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c index 56490dbc43..b99e287224 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c @@ -442,9 +442,14 @@ int vgic_connect_hw_irq(struct domain *d, struct vcpu *v, unsigned int virq, if ( connect ) { - /* The VIRQ should not be already enabled by the guest */ + /* + * The VIRQ should not be already enabled by the guest nor + * active/pending in the guest. + */ if ( !p->desc && - !test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ENABLED, &p->status) ) + !test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ENABLED, &p->status) && + !test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE, &p->status) && + !test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ACTIVE, &p->status) ) p->desc = desc; else ret = -EBUSY; diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c index 44c40e86de..b3467a76ae 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c @@ -135,14 +135,6 @@ int gic_route_irq_to_guest(struct domain *d, unsigned int virq, ASSERT(virq < vgic_num_irqs(d)); ASSERT(!is_lpi(virq)); - /* - * When routing an IRQ to guest, the virtual state is not synced - * back to the physical IRQ. To prevent get unsync, restrict the - * routing to when the Domain is been created. - */ - if ( d->creation_finished ) - return -EBUSY; - ret = vgic_connect_hw_irq(d, NULL, virq, desc, true); if ( ret ) return ret; diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c index b9463a5f27..048e12c562 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c @@ -876,8 +876,11 @@ int vgic_connect_hw_irq(struct domain *d, struct vcpu *vcpu, if ( connect ) /* assign a mapped IRQ */ { - /* The VIRQ should not be already enabled by the guest */ - if ( !irq->hw && !irq->enabled ) + /* + * The VIRQ should not be already enabled by the guest nor + * active/pending in the guest + */ + if ( !irq->hw && !irq->enabled && !irq->active && !irq->pending_latch ) { irq->hw = true; irq->hwintid = desc->irq;
Currently, adding physical interrupts are only allowed at the domain creation time. For use cases such as dynamic device tree overlay addition, the adding of physical IRQ to running domains should be allowed. Drop the above-mentioned domain creation check. Since this will introduce interrupt state unsync issues for cases when the interrupt is active or pending in the guest, therefore for these cases we simply reject the operation. Do it for both new and old vGIC implementations. Signed-off-by: Henry Wang <xin.wang2@amd.com> --- v4: - Split the original patch, only do the adding IRQ stuff in this patch. v3: - Update in-code comments. - Correct the if conditions. - Add taking/releasing the vgic lock of the vcpu. v2: - Reject the case where the IRQ is active or pending in guest. --- xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c | 9 +++++++-- xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 8 -------- xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 7 +++++-- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)