From patchwork Wed Mar 12 10:16:18 2025 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Michal Orzel X-Patchwork-Id: 14013270 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F4F2C35FF1 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.910190.1316956 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tsJ8s-0002IR-13; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:16:50 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 910190.1316956; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:16:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tsJ8r-0002IK-Uh; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:16:49 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 910190; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:16:48 +0000 Received: from se1-gles-flk1-in.inumbo.com ([94.247.172.50] helo=se1-gles-flk1.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tsJ8q-0001og-Qe for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:16:48 +0000 Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam11on20606.outbound.protection.outlook.com [2a01:111:f403:2416::606]) by se1-gles-flk1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 19de634c-ff2b-11ef-9898-31a8f345e629; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:16:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from BN0PR04CA0055.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:e8::30) by IA0PR12MB8327.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:40e::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.8511.27; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:16:39 +0000 Received: from BN2PEPF00004FBC.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:e8::4) by BN0PR04CA0055.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:408:e8::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.8534.24 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:16:39 +0000 Received: from SATLEXMB03.amd.com (165.204.84.17) by BN2PEPF00004FBC.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.243.182) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.20.8534.20 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:16:39 +0000 Received: from SATLEXMB05.amd.com (10.181.40.146) by SATLEXMB03.amd.com (10.181.40.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.39; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 05:16:39 -0500 Received: from SATLEXMB03.amd.com (10.181.40.144) by SATLEXMB05.amd.com (10.181.40.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.39; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 05:16:37 -0500 Received: from XIR-MICHALO-L1.xilinx.com (10.180.168.240) by SATLEXMB03.amd.com (10.181.40.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2507.39 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 05:16:37 -0500 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 19de634c-ff2b-11ef-9898-31a8f345e629 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=AZVlbqaZRHIe2HX9qmfyOS3Pv2Myw1T1wFLaHU29BZGKchrEzBiqCypoRRaufBgXhdz/VcM4vJLwIud5PgA9uAcC63C5NDV3eTPGIajCYKHIg8t6Ws32de+i753iJovWMJZlOcg3SPBznZebPobLnbj1Vte5J9aZXco/UaKOgy46CtRXLR6C/SgfAiF8hJkwjHyUil/FCoIAkWxioeR+vroU6RYpofPC8ipBLhvCdLKO3D5ALhkP1+a0Uc/80D+3zAa8VpMAYz4LJI+izkecM7ok8wxedkt8e+j9uq+w24ewrIXl+RIBOTxINOdlfQl+aaKtE+uSGnUQbqHVzLicDg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=EUiS3X87wUIiGTOtmKRB+99hMbj0GPrZMJMfpdLxn9M=; b=C4yMcSa9VjCvLDdK1yQCY6gePksGMDLjzuosl5lEqEz/LXQd3oPTZ9jlljdX3KrwdCRBep+iCqc8I+5Ye2RmPwDJK0NxkdBeoOJYJEBLknjVoYmvN3MUNP/gTgBSxQIKxzDJ6ixBT1UQy2E7J4ZPoMpbhJ8dFryG3Re2x9N8vsWt0Wqc4AAWiT+nBBcX963rb3bIBfBMrUeFRvThMPiZyHNCQvc06/DWX4hhT+TBUTBINzHlZfDq3TG+JHdPotXz5oBSEtc6QIqJ8gl/zi22JJhEtOSX6FXqo9xXbkfANpn50I3qspqd55HePIQpnwnsZ0CYsLlRzmi2FjjGqyS4gg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 165.204.84.17) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine sp=quarantine pct=100) action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amd.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=EUiS3X87wUIiGTOtmKRB+99hMbj0GPrZMJMfpdLxn9M=; b=NbfUNrjJbpC54ZKk/SZgX9+dCxuJi4EGfNuIiOKw22zt3MftgI8nAVsEWsHYWjuuvFtzIXZHFtQ9CyDzdFn+6CYI84fwwbRuSpxc6svJFiUj1U6EyW88uOZE47J7Ryx1lU/b5wutzleX0+ejpTc0bV5LaHbLXy/fhRpWF1DQVMg= X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 165.204.84.17) smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=amd.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB03.amd.com; pr=C From: Michal Orzel To: CC: Michal Orzel , Stefano Stabellini , Julien Grall , Bertrand Marquis , Volodymyr Babchuk Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] xen/arm: Improve handling of nr_spis Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:16:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20250312101619.327391-2-michal.orzel@amd.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20250312101619.327391-1-michal.orzel@amd.com> References: <20250312101619.327391-1-michal.orzel@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: None (SATLEXMB05.amd.com: michal.orzel@amd.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BN2PEPF00004FBC:EE_|IA0PR12MB8327:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 85778e11-a4f2-48e7-960c-08dd614efa76 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;ARA:13230040|1800799024|82310400026|36860700013|376014; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:165.204.84.17;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:CAL;SFV:NSPM;H:SATLEXMB03.amd.com;PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230040)(1800799024)(82310400026)(36860700013)(376014);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Mar 2025 10:16:39.3272 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 85778e11-a4f2-48e7-960c-08dd614efa76 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB03.amd.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN2PEPF00004FBC.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: IA0PR12MB8327 At the moment, we print a warning about max number of IRQs supported by GIC bigger than vGIC only for hardware domain. This check is not hwdom special, and should be made common. Also, in case of user not specifying nr_spis for dom0less domUs, we should take into account max number of IRQs supported by vGIC if it's smaller than for GIC. Introduce VGIC_MAX_IRQS macro and use it instead of hardcoded 992 value. Introduce VGIC_DEF_NR_SPIS macro to store the default number of vGIC SPIs. Fix calculation of nr_spis for dom0less domUs and make the GIC/vGIC max IRQs comparison common. Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis --- Changes in v2: - add macro for: min(gic_number_lines(), VGIC_MAX_IRQS) - 32 --- xen/arch/arm/dom0less-build.c | 2 +- xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 8 +------- xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 3 +++ xen/arch/arm/include/asm/vgic.h | 6 ++++++ 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/dom0less-build.c b/xen/arch/arm/dom0less-build.c index 31f31c38da3f..573b0d25ae41 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/dom0less-build.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/dom0less-build.c @@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ void __init create_domUs(void) { int vpl011_virq = GUEST_VPL011_SPI; - d_cfg.arch.nr_spis = gic_number_lines() - 32; + d_cfg.arch.nr_spis = VGIC_DEF_NR_SPIS; /* * The VPL011 virq is GUEST_VPL011_SPI, unless direct-map is diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c index 7cc141ef75e9..2b5b4331834f 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c @@ -2371,13 +2371,7 @@ void __init create_dom0(void) /* The vGIC for DOM0 is exactly emulating the hardware GIC */ dom0_cfg.arch.gic_version = XEN_DOMCTL_CONFIG_GIC_NATIVE; - /* - * Xen vGIC supports a maximum of 992 interrupt lines. - * 32 are substracted to cover local IRQs. - */ - dom0_cfg.arch.nr_spis = min(gic_number_lines(), (unsigned int) 992) - 32; - if ( gic_number_lines() > 992 ) - printk(XENLOG_WARNING "Maximum number of vGIC IRQs exceeded.\n"); + dom0_cfg.arch.nr_spis = VGIC_DEF_NR_SPIS; dom0_cfg.arch.tee_type = tee_get_type(); dom0_cfg.max_vcpus = dom0_max_vcpus(); diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c index acf61a4de373..e80fe0ca2421 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c @@ -251,6 +251,9 @@ void __init gic_init(void) panic("Failed to initialize the GIC drivers\n"); /* Clear LR mask for cpu0 */ clear_cpu_lr_mask(); + + if ( gic_number_lines() > VGIC_MAX_IRQS ) + printk(XENLOG_WARNING "Maximum number of vGIC IRQs exceeded\n"); } void send_SGI_mask(const cpumask_t *cpumask, enum gic_sgi sgi) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/vgic.h b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/vgic.h index e309dca1ad01..35c0c6a8b0b0 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/vgic.h +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/vgic.h @@ -329,6 +329,12 @@ extern void vgic_check_inflight_irqs_pending(struct vcpu *v, */ #define vgic_num_irqs(d) ((d)->arch.vgic.nr_spis + 32) +/* Maximum number of IRQs supported by vGIC */ +#define VGIC_MAX_IRQS 992U + +/* Default number of vGIC SPIs. 32 are substracted to cover local IRQs. */ +#define VGIC_DEF_NR_SPIS (min(gic_number_lines(), VGIC_MAX_IRQS) - 32) + /* * Allocate a guest VIRQ * - spi == 0 => allocate a PPI. It will be the same on every vCPU