Message ID | 21e6cbec-dc29-452f-b6a2-6926245a8beb@suse.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E97CC48BF6 for <xen-devel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.685637.1066659 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org>) id 1ree3L-0006er-9h; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:42:07 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 685637.1066659; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:42:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org>) id 1ree3L-0006ek-79; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:42:07 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 685637; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:42:05 +0000 Received: from se1-gles-sth1-in.inumbo.com ([159.253.27.254] helo=se1-gles-sth1.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <SRS0=hPQ6=KD=suse.com=jbeulich@srs-se1.protection.inumbo.net>) id 1ree3J-0006ea-GP for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:42:05 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) by se1-gles-sth1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id f8c9f634-d4c5-11ee-8a58-1f161083a0e0; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:42:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-563c595f968so4333920a12.0 for <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:42:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.156.60.236] (ip-037-024-206-209.um08.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [37.24.206.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d18-20020a056402401200b005640022af58sm2509237eda.83.2024.02.26.08.42.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:42:03 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/options/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org> List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org> X-Inumbo-ID: f8c9f634-d4c5-11ee-8a58-1f161083a0e0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1708965724; x=1709570524; darn=lists.xenproject.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:autocrypt:content-language :references:cc:to:from:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6L5GGffCzRNgfzqvhyjL4MWez5VsJpAVC5R921GjUEE=; b=VVRBB1ynWbQeqlOy1mDrFYTUkp3QbwS2QrBa/75swhRLf5d5E78PYQXk8ZPiisxfcp UuGSLMK696rfC32SBH7FbGEQ8msGXU3WUed4s5/L1JmKhHnTZgDStqWnIvCXe/iH1vEG RGZl9sifExS5Mbh5JjHy0F0fIxrHahh0qbUpMbfhnUy4lAsDhEqtCThJVdxl3BeUEFD4 u5W54zxWGn2mnRZEI7dSEY80dhfC32UgLW7VE7VfrgytZyw+Om7JU3EphngrjnUIBYnY iaoguAcIY06MeoLLatgAr1N3ecTvthkNf9ylDDN9DOWw4hHNmnEkeZGhh1E8Q5kUqe07 aVbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708965724; x=1709570524; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:autocrypt:content-language :references:cc:to:from:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=6L5GGffCzRNgfzqvhyjL4MWez5VsJpAVC5R921GjUEE=; b=qfiaO91j6/bERuGWoPDanph0UmDguDTQQowU4thqntOR7o3671QGnKq3BEx+ea+UeJ c0/tmZdY91+BvVuWCoistE+sn2uHe2qSTYX7ez//WuYmYTfBPwP2rJZFSPDCyx3fennM oqSJIl3MDuEHc+GdfDOTPSCcc8kGLBqpKa9Z5HnDMvOjWiw/XgUd2rwM9gHN/bQRQGFp F6SWpAW6bmpx3OXZt7a+G1RAH8L7zi9TNEGfROzhzlxJB922W86mcudV6d+JtiNACJi6 mLAyV/4/w4M6yPKegKf4ofUzvMK8X66aNyPNHlaXqWI9N6urgdqNqA0RMlxGX6CaQRjV mULA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz4XfqJDoxkyVVUeDvdNHEfGoe0rBTRlViLvtBb0EgNxKhPoAn+ Jvod4cvdbDErMGBRvPEpvHQTL8OjywLYR0LkHkLgnj8wcFuetNM+yL+NbPtIpASgWviMFo+POQ4 = X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFObpng2g0iR1LdcIGU+8vI61RJHJXBCIcZv6BTvuxx+tYrdIce4ZzeYalYq38YVjeDbHqyEA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cb13:0:b0:566:2a1c:9c0f with SMTP id s19-20020aa7cb13000000b005662a1c9c0fmr187597edt.16.1708965723871; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:42:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <21e6cbec-dc29-452f-b6a2-6926245a8beb@suse.com> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:42:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: [PATCH v3 01/12] VMX: don't run with CR4.VMXE set when VMX could not be enabled From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> To: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>, =?utf-8?q?Roger_Pau_Monn=C3=A9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com> References: <293e5aef-8843-461c-bc96-709a605b2680@suse.com> Content-Language: en-US Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@suse.com; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL In-Reply-To: <293e5aef-8843-461c-bc96-709a605b2680@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit |
Series |
x86/HVM: misc tidying
|
expand
|
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 05:42:02PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > While generally benign, doing so is still at best misleading. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> Thanks, Roger.
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c @@ -2961,14 +2961,18 @@ static bool __init has_if_pschange_mc(vo const struct hvm_function_table * __init start_vmx(void) { - set_in_cr4(X86_CR4_VMXE); + write_cr4(read_cr4() | X86_CR4_VMXE); if ( vmx_vmcs_init() ) { + write_cr4(read_cr4() & ~X86_CR4_VMXE); printk("VMX: failed to initialise.\n"); return NULL; } + /* Arrange for APs to have CR4.VMXE set early on. */ + set_in_cr4(X86_CR4_VMXE); + vmx_function_table.singlestep_supported = cpu_has_monitor_trap_flag; if ( cpu_has_vmx_dt_exiting )
While generally benign, doing so is still at best misleading. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- Using set_in_cr4() seems favorable over updating mmu_cr4_features despite the resulting redundant CR4 update. But I certainly could be talked into going the alternative route. --- v2: Actually clear CR4.VMXE for the BSP on the error path.