Message ID | 575FE46D02000078000F4A8F@prv-mh.provo.novell.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 14/06/16 10:03, Jan Beulich wrote: > ... instead of using -ENODEV for any kind of error. It in particular > addresses Coverity ID 1362694 (introduced by commit eb48587210 ["AMD > IOMMU: introduce support for IVHD block type 11h"]). > > Coverity ID: 1362694 > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
On 6/14/2016 4:09 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 14/06/16 10:03, Jan Beulich wrote: >> ... instead of using -ENODEV for any kind of error. It in particular >> addresses Coverity ID 1362694 (introduced by commit eb48587210 ["AMD >> IOMMU: introduce support for IVHD block type 11h"]). >> >> Coverity ID: 1362694 >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> > > Reviewed-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> Thank you for the fix up. Suravee
On June 14, 2016 5:03 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote: > - if ( amd_iommu_update_ivrs_mapping_acpi() != 0 ) > + rc = amd_iommu_update_ivrs_mapping_acpi(); > + if ( rc ) > goto error_out; > > /* initialize io-apic interrupt remapping entries */ > - if ( iommu_intremap && amd_iommu_setup_ioapic_remapping() != 0 ) > + if ( iommu_intremap ) > + rc = amd_iommu_setup_ioapic_remapping(); > + if ( rc ) > goto error_out; Is it better to indent this if() here? Then, + if ( iommu_intremap ) + { + rc = amd_iommu_setup_ioapic_remapping(); + if ( rc ) + goto error_out; + } Quan
>>> On 16.06.16 at 04:03, <quan.xu@intel.com> wrote: > On June 14, 2016 5:03 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote: >> - if ( amd_iommu_update_ivrs_mapping_acpi() != 0 ) >> + rc = amd_iommu_update_ivrs_mapping_acpi(); >> + if ( rc ) >> goto error_out; >> >> /* initialize io-apic interrupt remapping entries */ >> - if ( iommu_intremap && amd_iommu_setup_ioapic_remapping() != 0 ) >> + if ( iommu_intremap ) >> + rc = amd_iommu_setup_ioapic_remapping(); >> + if ( rc ) >> goto error_out; > > > Is it better to indent this if() here? Then, > > + if ( iommu_intremap ) > + { > + rc = amd_iommu_setup_ioapic_remapping(); > + if ( rc ) > + goto error_out; > + } What would this help (apart from increasing LOC and patch size)? Jan
On June 16, 2016 4:29 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote: > >>> On 16.06.16 at 04:03, <quan.xu@intel.com> wrote: > > On June 14, 2016 5:03 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote: > >> - if ( amd_iommu_update_ivrs_mapping_acpi() != 0 ) > >> + rc = amd_iommu_update_ivrs_mapping_acpi(); > >> + if ( rc ) > >> goto error_out; > >> > >> /* initialize io-apic interrupt remapping entries */ > >> - if ( iommu_intremap && amd_iommu_setup_ioapic_remapping() != 0 ) > >> + if ( iommu_intremap ) > >> + rc = amd_iommu_setup_ioapic_remapping(); > >> + if ( rc ) > >> goto error_out; > > > > > > Is it better to indent this if() here? Then, > > > > + if ( iommu_intremap ) > > + { > > + rc = amd_iommu_setup_ioapic_remapping(); > > + if ( rc ) > > + goto error_out; > > + } > > What would this help (apart from increasing LOC and patch size)? > Ah, first of all, it is not a logic issue, but just make the code clear: - this if( rc ) is called only if ( iommu_intremap ) is true. - this error is from amd_iommu_setup_ioapic_remapping(). Also from '- if ( iommu_intremap && amd_iommu_setup_ioapic_remapping() != 0 )', I'd like to fix it as my suggestion. Quan
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_init.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_init.c @@ -1226,6 +1226,7 @@ static bool_t __init amd_sp5100_erratum2 int __init amd_iommu_init(void) { struct amd_iommu *iommu; + int rc = -ENODEV; BUG_ON( !iommu_found() ); @@ -1237,28 +1238,39 @@ int __init amd_iommu_init(void) if ( unlikely(acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_MSI) ) goto error_out; - ivhd_type = amd_iommu_get_supported_ivhd_type(); - if ( ivhd_type < 0 ) + rc = amd_iommu_get_supported_ivhd_type(); + if ( rc < 0 ) goto error_out; + ivhd_type = rc; - ivrs_bdf_entries = amd_iommu_get_ivrs_dev_entries(); - if ( !ivrs_bdf_entries ) + rc = amd_iommu_get_ivrs_dev_entries(); + if ( !rc ) + rc = -ENODEV; + if ( rc < 0 ) goto error_out; + ivrs_bdf_entries = rc; radix_tree_init(&ivrs_maps); for_each_amd_iommu ( iommu ) - if ( alloc_ivrs_mappings(iommu->seg) != 0 ) + { + rc = alloc_ivrs_mappings(iommu->seg); + if ( rc ) goto error_out; + } - if ( amd_iommu_update_ivrs_mapping_acpi() != 0 ) + rc = amd_iommu_update_ivrs_mapping_acpi(); + if ( rc ) goto error_out; /* initialize io-apic interrupt remapping entries */ - if ( iommu_intremap && amd_iommu_setup_ioapic_remapping() != 0 ) + if ( iommu_intremap ) + rc = amd_iommu_setup_ioapic_remapping(); + if ( rc ) goto error_out; /* allocate and initialize a global device table shared by all iommus */ - if ( iterate_ivrs_mappings(amd_iommu_setup_device_table) != 0 ) + rc = iterate_ivrs_mappings(amd_iommu_setup_device_table); + if ( rc ) goto error_out; /* @@ -1271,14 +1283,17 @@ int __init amd_iommu_init(void) /* per iommu initialization */ for_each_amd_iommu ( iommu ) - if ( amd_iommu_init_one(iommu) != 0 ) + { + rc = amd_iommu_init_one(iommu); + if ( rc ) goto error_out; + } return 0; error_out: amd_iommu_init_cleanup(); - return -ENODEV; + return rc; } static void disable_iommu(struct amd_iommu *iommu)