Message ID | 59e9749d3c6a22469bc9fb804b7b7c13850e9e94.1709896401.git.nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | address some violations of MISRA C Rule 20.7 | expand |
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024, Nicola Vetrini wrote: > MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion > of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some > macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all > current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that > can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter. > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/spinlock.h b/xen/include/xen/spinlock.h index 1cd9120eac7a..0e6a083dfb9e 100644 --- a/xen/include/xen/spinlock.h +++ b/xen/include/xen/spinlock.h @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ struct lock_profile_qhead { int32_t idx; /* index for printout */ }; -#define _LOCK_PROFILE(lockname) { .name = #lockname, .lock = &lockname, } +#define _LOCK_PROFILE(lockname) { .name = #lockname, .lock = &(lockname), } #define _LOCK_PROFILE_PTR(name) \ static struct lock_profile * const __lock_profile_##name \ __used_section(".lockprofile.data") = \
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com> --- xen/include/xen/spinlock.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)