Message ID | 62f4a9e7a19b37c970e52f138a6eeb8f7363b7bc.1690449587.git.nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | address violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 5.3 on x86 | expand |
On 27.07.2023 12:48, Nicola Vetrini wrote: > The rename s/p2mt/t/ is done to avoid shadowing the same declaration > in the enclosing scope. > > Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com> > --- > Is the semantics of the function altered if the inner declaration > is removed entirely? No, that's what should be done. It's an output only for get_gfn(). Jan
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c index 714358f953..fa9f7616e8 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c @@ -2439,12 +2439,12 @@ int xenmem_add_to_physmap_one( case XENMAPSPACE_gmfn: { - p2m_type_t p2mt; + p2m_type_t t; gfn = idx; - mfn = get_gfn_unshare(d, gfn, &p2mt); + mfn = get_gfn_unshare(d, gfn, &t); /* If the page is still shared, exit early */ - if ( p2m_is_shared(p2mt) ) + if ( p2m_is_shared(t) ) { put_gfn(d, gfn); return -ENOMEM;
The rename s/p2mt/t/ is done to avoid shadowing the same declaration in the enclosing scope. Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com> --- Is the semantics of the function altered if the inner declaration is removed entirely? --- xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)