diff mbox series

[v2,09/13] x86/shadow: drop is_hvm_...() where easily possible

Message ID bd15a200-aaa0-5c96-3be7-4f484ef3fc82@suse.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series x86: assorted shadow mode adjustments | expand

Commit Message

Jan Beulich March 30, 2023, 11:30 a.m. UTC
Emulation related functions are involved in HVM handling only, and in
some cases they even invoke such checks after having already done things
which are valid for HVM domains only. OOS active also implies HVM. In
sh_remove_all_mappings() one of the two checks is redundant with an
earlier paging_mode_external() one (the other, however, needs to stay).

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
---
v2: Re-base over changes/additions earlier in the series.
diff mbox series

Patch

--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c
@@ -1522,7 +1522,7 @@  int sh_remove_all_mappings(struct domain
                && (page->count_info & PGC_count_mask) <= 3
                && ((page->u.inuse.type_info & PGT_count_mask)
                    == (is_special_page(page) ||
-                       (is_hvm_domain(d) && is_ioreq_server_page(d, page))))) )
+                       is_ioreq_server_page(d, page)))) )
             printk(XENLOG_G_ERR "can't find all mappings of mfn %"PRI_mfn
                    " (gfn %"PRI_gfn"): c=%lx t=%lx s=%d i=%d\n",
                    mfn_x(gmfn), gfn_x(gfn),
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/hvm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/hvm.c
@@ -204,10 +204,6 @@  hvm_emulate_write(enum x86_segment seg,
     if ( rc || !bytes )
         return rc;
 
-    /* Unaligned writes are only acceptable on HVM */
-    if ( (addr & (bytes - 1)) && !is_hvm_vcpu(v)  )
-        return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
-
     ptr = sh_emulate_map_dest(v, addr, bytes, sh_ctxt);
     if ( IS_ERR(ptr) )
         return ~PTR_ERR(ptr);
@@ -258,10 +254,6 @@  hvm_emulate_cmpxchg(enum x86_segment seg
     if ( rc )
         return rc;
 
-    /* Unaligned writes are only acceptable on HVM */
-    if ( (addr & (bytes - 1)) && !is_hvm_vcpu(v)  )
-        return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
-
     ptr = sh_emulate_map_dest(v, addr, bytes, sh_ctxt);
     if ( IS_ERR(ptr) )
         return ~PTR_ERR(ptr);
@@ -457,8 +449,7 @@  static void *sh_emulate_map_dest(struct
 
 #ifndef NDEBUG
     /* We don't emulate user-mode writes to page tables. */
-    if ( is_hvm_domain(d) ? hvm_get_cpl(v) == 3
-                          : !guest_kernel_mode(v, guest_cpu_user_regs()) )
+    if ( hvm_get_cpl(v) == 3 )
     {
         gdprintk(XENLOG_DEBUG, "User-mode write to pagetable reached "
                  "emulate_map_dest(). This should never happen!\n");
@@ -487,15 +478,6 @@  static void *sh_emulate_map_dest(struct
         sh_ctxt->mfn[1] = INVALID_MFN;
         map = map_domain_page(sh_ctxt->mfn[0]) + (vaddr & ~PAGE_MASK);
     }
-    else if ( !is_hvm_domain(d) )
-    {
-        /*
-         * Cross-page emulated writes are only supported for HVM guests;
-         * PV guests ought to know better.
-         */
-        put_page(mfn_to_page(sh_ctxt->mfn[0]));
-        return MAPPING_UNHANDLEABLE;
-    }
     else
     {
         /* This write crosses a page boundary. Translate the second page. */
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
@@ -3438,7 +3438,7 @@  int sh_rm_write_access_from_sl1p(struct
     ASSERT(mfn_valid(smfn));
 
     /* Remember if we've been told that this process is being torn down */
-    if ( curr->domain == d && is_hvm_domain(d) )
+    if ( curr->domain == d )
         curr->arch.paging.shadow.pagetable_dying
             = mfn_to_page(gmfn)->pagetable_dying;
 
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/oos.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/oos.c
@@ -580,7 +580,6 @@  int sh_unsync(struct vcpu *v, mfn_t gmfn
     if ( (pg->shadow_flags &
           ((SHF_page_type_mask & ~SHF_L1_ANY) | SHF_out_of_sync)) ||
          sh_page_has_multiple_shadows(pg) ||
-         !is_hvm_vcpu(v) ||
          !v->domain->arch.paging.shadow.oos_active )
         return 0;