@@ -258,7 +258,6 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
break;
case XENPF_add_memtype:
- {
ret = mtrr_add_page(
op->u.add_memtype.mfn,
op->u.add_memtype.nr_mfns,
@@ -273,11 +272,9 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
if ( ret != 0 )
mtrr_del_page(ret, 0, 0);
}
- }
- break;
+ break;
case XENPF_del_memtype:
- {
if (op->u.del_memtype.handle == 0
/* mtrr/main.c otherwise does a lookup */
&& (int)op->u.del_memtype.reg >= 0)
@@ -288,8 +285,7 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
}
else
ret = -EINVAL;
- }
- break;
+ break;
case XENPF_read_memtype:
{
@@ -306,8 +302,8 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
ret = __copy_field_to_guest(u_xenpf_op, op, u.read_memtype)
? -EFAULT : 0;
}
+ break;
}
- break;
case XENPF_microcode_update:
{
@@ -316,8 +312,8 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
guest_from_compat_handle(data, op->u.microcode.data);
ret = microcode_update(data, op->u.microcode.length);
+ break;
}
- break;
case XENPF_platform_quirk:
{
@@ -340,8 +336,8 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
}
+ break;
}
- break;
case XENPF_firmware_info:
switch ( op->u.firmware_info.type )
@@ -521,8 +517,8 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
if ( ret == 0 && __copy_field_to_guest(u_xenpf_op, op, u.getidletime) )
ret = -EFAULT;
+ break;
}
- break;
case XENPF_set_processor_pminfo:
switch ( op->u.set_pminfo.type )
@@ -560,8 +556,8 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
guest_from_compat_handle(pdc, op->u.set_pminfo.u.pdc);
ret = acpi_set_pdc_bits(op->u.set_pminfo.id, pdc);
+ break;
}
- break;
default:
ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -601,8 +597,8 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
put_cpu_maps();
ret = __copy_field_to_guest(u_xenpf_op, op, u.pcpu_info) ? -EFAULT : 0;
+ break;
}
- break;
case XENPF_get_cpu_version:
{
@@ -637,8 +633,8 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
if ( __copy_field_to_guest(u_xenpf_op, op, u.pcpu_version) )
ret = -EFAULT;
+ break;
}
- break;
case XENPF_get_ucode_revision:
{
@@ -666,8 +662,8 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
if ( __copy_field_to_guest(u_xenpf_op, op, u.ucode_revision) )
ret = -EFAULT;
+ break;
}
- break;
case XENPF_cpu_online:
{
@@ -725,7 +721,6 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
0, cpu_down_helper, (void *)(unsigned long)cpu);
break;
}
- break;
case XENPF_cpu_hotadd:
ret = xsm_resource_plug_core(XSM_HOOK);
@@ -735,7 +730,7 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
ret = cpu_add(op->u.cpu_add.apic_id,
op->u.cpu_add.acpi_id,
op->u.cpu_add.pxm);
- break;
+ break;
case XENPF_mem_hotadd:
ret = xsm_resource_plug_core(XSM_HOOK);
@@ -775,8 +770,8 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
}
+ break;
}
- break;
case XENPF_resource_op:
{
@@ -842,8 +837,8 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
ret = ra.nr_done;
xfree(ra.entries);
+ break;
}
- break;
case XENPF_get_symbol:
{
@@ -870,8 +865,8 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
ret = -EFAULT;
if ( !ret && __copy_field_to_guest(u_xenpf_op, op, u.symdata) )
ret = -EFAULT;
+ break;
}
- break;
#ifdef CONFIG_VIDEO
case XENPF_get_dom0_console:
The function has a few stray scopes and inconsistent use (indentation) of break statements. Drop the stray braces and bring all the break-s in line with one another. This in particular means dropping a redundant break from XENPF_cpu_offline handling, pleasing Misra C:2012 rule 2.1. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- This is an alternative proposal to https://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2023-12/msg01540.html. A few more scopes could be eliminated if the various "cpu" variables were consolidated to switch() of function scope. --- v2: Also move an inconsistently indented break of an inner switch() (in XENPF_set_processor_pminfo handling).