| Message ID | e7aea6bacb9c914a06a929dfe3606f7cc360588f.1719383180.git.federico.serafini@bugseng.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | x86: address some violations of MISRA C Rule 16.3 | expand |
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024, Federico Serafini wrote: > Add break or pseudo keyword fallthrough to address violations of > MISRA C Rule 16.3: "An unconditional `break' statement shall terminate > every switch-clause". > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@bugseng.com> > --- > Changes in v3: > - use break instead of fallthrough. > --- > xen/arch/x86/traps.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c > index 9906e874d5..d62598a4c2 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c > @@ -1186,6 +1186,7 @@ void cpuid_hypervisor_leaves(const struct vcpu *v, uint32_t leaf, > > default: > ASSERT_UNREACHABLE(); > + break; FYI the ASSERT_UNREACHABLE is still being discussed Other than that: Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> > } > } > > @@ -1748,6 +1749,7 @@ static void io_check_error(const struct cpu_user_regs *regs) > { > case 'd': /* 'dom0' */ > nmi_hwdom_report(_XEN_NMIREASON_io_error); > + break; > case 'i': /* 'ignore' */ > break; > default: /* 'fatal' */ > @@ -1768,6 +1770,7 @@ static void unknown_nmi_error(const struct cpu_user_regs *regs, > { > case 'd': /* 'dom0' */ > nmi_hwdom_report(_XEN_NMIREASON_unknown); > + break; > case 'i': /* 'ignore' */ > break; > default: /* 'fatal' */
On 27.06.2024 02:52, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jun 2024, Federico Serafini wrote: >> Add break or pseudo keyword fallthrough to address violations of >> MISRA C Rule 16.3: "An unconditional `break' statement shall terminate >> every switch-clause". >> >> No functional change. >> >> Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@bugseng.com> >> --- >> Changes in v3: >> - use break instead of fallthrough. >> --- >> xen/arch/x86/traps.c | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c >> index 9906e874d5..d62598a4c2 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c >> @@ -1186,6 +1186,7 @@ void cpuid_hypervisor_leaves(const struct vcpu *v, uint32_t leaf, >> >> default: >> ASSERT_UNREACHABLE(); >> + break; > > FYI the ASSERT_UNREACHABLE is still being discussed Could you clarify what this means for this patch and you R-b? Is it somehow conditional upon the outcome of that discussion, and hence you'd rather not see this patch go in yet? > Other than that: > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Jan
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c index 9906e874d5..d62598a4c2 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c @@ -1186,6 +1186,7 @@ void cpuid_hypervisor_leaves(const struct vcpu *v, uint32_t leaf, default: ASSERT_UNREACHABLE(); + break; } } @@ -1748,6 +1749,7 @@ static void io_check_error(const struct cpu_user_regs *regs) { case 'd': /* 'dom0' */ nmi_hwdom_report(_XEN_NMIREASON_io_error); + break; case 'i': /* 'ignore' */ break; default: /* 'fatal' */ @@ -1768,6 +1770,7 @@ static void unknown_nmi_error(const struct cpu_user_regs *regs, { case 'd': /* 'dom0' */ nmi_hwdom_report(_XEN_NMIREASON_unknown); + break; case 'i': /* 'ignore' */ break; default: /* 'fatal' */
Add break or pseudo keyword fallthrough to address violations of MISRA C Rule 16.3: "An unconditional `break' statement shall terminate every switch-clause". No functional change. Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@bugseng.com> --- Changes in v3: - use break instead of fallthrough. --- xen/arch/x86/traps.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)