Message ID | 20230326170623.386288-1-amir73il@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Two more xfs backports for 5.10.y (from v5.11) | expand |
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 08:06:21PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > Darrick, > > These two backports were selected by Chandan for 5.4.y, but are > currently missing from 5.10.y. > > I've put them through the usual kdevops testing routine. > > This is the second time that I have considered patch #2 for 5.10.y. > The last time around, I observed increased the probablity of a known > buffer corruption assertion when running xfs/076, so I suspected > a regression, and dropped it from the submission [1]. > > At the time, the alleged regression happened only in the kdevops setup > and neither I nor Brain were able to understand why that happens [2]. > This time around, the kdevops setup did not observe that odd regression. Heh, I had a roommate once whose name got misspelled to Brain on the water bills, and I still chuckle every time I see that. ;) Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> --D > > Thanks, > Amir. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20220601104547.260949-1-amir73il@gmail.com/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/YpY6hUknor2S1iMd@bfoster/T/#mf1add66b8309a75a8984f28ea08718f22033bce7 > > Brian Foster (1): > xfs: don't reuse busy extents on extent trim > > Darrick J. Wong (1): > xfs: shut down the filesystem if we screw up quota reservation > > fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c | 14 -------------- > fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c | 13 ++++++++++--- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.34.1 >