From patchwork Mon Jul 25 14:09:05 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Andreas Gruenbacher X-Patchwork-Id: 9245657 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A536607D3 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B54A212D9 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 7FEB0276AE; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:10:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from oss.sgi.com (oss.sgi.com [192.48.182.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C830A212D9 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:10:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5E07CCF; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:10:11 -0500 (CDT) X-Original-To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Delivered-To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF617CCD for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:10:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCB7304051 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 07:10:09 -0700 (PDT) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1469455807-0bf57c136885420001-NocioJ Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id gx7gLvahcXBcxrik (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 07:10:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: agruenba@redhat.com X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP: mx1.redhat.com[209.132.183.28] X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 209.132.183.28 X-ASG-Whitelist: Client Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90292C04B33B; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nux.redhat.com (vpn1-6-233.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.6.233]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u6PE9KUv021566; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:10:02 -0400 From: Andreas Gruenbacher To: Alexander Viro Subject: [PATCH v24 08/22] richacl: Permission check algorithm Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:09:05 +0200 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: [PATCH v24 08/22] richacl: Permission check algorithm Message-Id: <1469455759-6141-9-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1469455759-6141-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> References: <1469455759-6141-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.27 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:10:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Barracuda-Connect: mx1.redhat.com[209.132.183.28] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1469455808 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 X-Barracuda-URL: https://192.48.176.15:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 5317 X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at sgi.com X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o , Andreas Gruenbacher , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Trond Myklebust , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig , Andreas Dilger , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Anna Schumaker X-BeenThere: xfs@oss.sgi.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP A richacl roughly grants a requested access if the NFSv4 acl in the richacl grants the requested permissions according to the NFSv4 permission check algorithm and the file mask that applies to the process includes the requested permissions. Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/richacl.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/richacl.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 129 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/richacl.c b/fs/richacl.c index 2072cf4..b7e96d0 100644 --- a/fs/richacl.c +++ b/fs/richacl.c @@ -175,3 +175,131 @@ richacl_want_to_mask(unsigned int want) mask |= RICHACE_WRITE_DATA; return mask; } + +/** + * richacl_permission - richacl permission check algorithm + * @inode: inode to check + * @acl: rich acl of the inode + * @want: requested access (MAY_* flags) + * + * Checks if the current process is granted @want flags in @acl. + */ +int +richacl_permission(struct inode *inode, const struct richacl *acl, + int want) +{ + const struct richace *ace; + unsigned int mask = richacl_want_to_mask(want); + unsigned int requested = mask, denied = 0; + int in_owning_group = in_group_p(inode->i_gid); + int in_owner_or_group_class = in_owning_group; + + /* + * A process is + * - in the owner file class if it owns the file, + * - in the group file class if it is in the file's owning group or + * it matches any of the user or group entries, and + * - in the other file class otherwise. + * The file class is only relevant for determining which file mask to + * apply, which only happens for masked acls. + */ + if (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_MASKED) { + if ((acl->a_flags & RICHACL_WRITE_THROUGH) && + uid_eq(current_fsuid(), inode->i_uid)) { + denied = requested & ~acl->a_owner_mask; + goto out; + } + } else { + /* + * When the acl is not masked, there is no need to determine if + * the process is in the group class and we can break out + * earlier of the loop below. + */ + in_owner_or_group_class = 1; + } + + /* + * Check if the acl grants the requested access and determine which + * file class the process is in. + */ + richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) { + unsigned int ace_mask = ace->e_mask; + + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) + continue; + if (richace_is_owner(ace)) { + if (!uid_eq(current_fsuid(), inode->i_uid)) + continue; + goto entry_matches_owner; + } else if (richace_is_group(ace)) { + if (!in_owning_group) + continue; + } else if (richace_is_unix_user(ace)) { + if (!uid_eq(current_fsuid(), ace->e_id.uid)) + continue; + if (uid_eq(current_fsuid(), inode->i_uid)) + goto entry_matches_owner; + } else if (richace_is_unix_group(ace)) { + if (!in_group_p(ace->e_id.gid)) + continue; + } else + goto entry_matches_everyone; + + /* + * Apply the group file mask to entries other than owner@ and + * everyone@ or user entries matching the owner. This ensures + * that we grant the same permissions as the acl computed by + * richacl_apply_masks(). + * + * Without this restriction, the following richacl would grant + * rw access to processes which are both the owner and in the + * owning group, but not to other users in the owning group, + * which could not be represented without masks: + * + * owner:rw::mask + * group@:rw::allow + */ + if ((acl->a_flags & RICHACL_MASKED) && richace_is_allow(ace)) + ace_mask &= acl->a_group_mask; + +entry_matches_owner: + /* The process is in the owner or group file class. */ + in_owner_or_group_class = 1; + +entry_matches_everyone: + /* Check which mask flags the ACE allows or denies. */ + if (richace_is_deny(ace)) + denied |= ace_mask & mask; + mask &= ~ace_mask; + + /* + * Keep going until we know which file class + * the process is in. + */ + if (!mask && in_owner_or_group_class) + break; + } + denied |= mask; + + if (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_MASKED) { + /* + * The file class a process is in determines which file mask + * applies. Check if that file mask also grants the requested + * access. + */ + if (uid_eq(current_fsuid(), inode->i_uid)) + denied |= requested & ~acl->a_owner_mask; + else if (in_owner_or_group_class) + denied |= requested & ~acl->a_group_mask; + else { + if (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_WRITE_THROUGH) + denied = requested & ~acl->a_other_mask; + else + denied |= requested & ~acl->a_other_mask; + } + } + +out: + return denied ? -EACCES : 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_permission); diff --git a/include/linux/richacl.h b/include/linux/richacl.h index 70923f8..beeec35 100644 --- a/include/linux/richacl.h +++ b/include/linux/richacl.h @@ -177,5 +177,6 @@ extern struct richacl *richacl_clone(const struct richacl *, gfp_t); extern void richace_copy(struct richace *, const struct richace *); extern int richacl_masks_to_mode(const struct richacl *); extern unsigned int richacl_mode_to_mask(umode_t); +extern int richacl_permission(struct inode *, const struct richacl *, int); #endif /* __RICHACL_H */