Message ID | 20160624122234.GA23169@mwanda (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:12:25PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote: > Hi Dan, > > xfs_errortag_add() is called by xfs_file_ioctl(), which accept the 1st > argument as signed, i.e, > > typedef struct xfs_error_injection { > __s32 fd; > __s32 errtag; > } xfs_error_injection_t; > > Should we make it happy as well? Also, the typedef can be converted to > to struct xfs_error_injection by removing the depreciated > xfs_error_injection_t > syntax if so. That has been the user interface for a while so I didn't want to change it. regards, dan carpenter
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_error.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_error.h index 4ed3042..2e4f67f 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_error.h +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_error.h @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ extern int xfs_error_test(int, int *, char *, int, char *, unsigned long); xfs_error_test((tag), (mp)->m_fixedfsid, "expr", __LINE__, __FILE__, \ (rf)))) -extern int xfs_errortag_add(int error_tag, struct xfs_mount *mp); +extern int xfs_errortag_add(unsigned int error_tag, struct xfs_mount *mp); extern int xfs_errortag_clearall(struct xfs_mount *mp, int loud); #else #define XFS_TEST_ERROR(expr, mp, tag, rf) (expr) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_error.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_error.c index 355619a..ed7ee4e 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_error.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_error.c @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ xfs_error_test(int error_tag, int *fsidp, char *expression, } int -xfs_errortag_add(int error_tag, xfs_mount_t *mp) +xfs_errortag_add(unsigned int error_tag, xfs_mount_t *mp) { int i; int len;
Errors go from zero which means no error to XFS_ERRTAG_MAX (22). My static checker complains that xfs_errortag_add() puts an upper bound on this but not a lower bound. Let's fix it by making it unsigned. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>