| Message ID | 20190111110127.21664-3-ming.lei@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | block: support multi-page bvec | expand |
diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c index 71e9ac03f621..f85d878f313d 100644 --- a/block/blk-merge.c +++ b/block/blk-merge.c @@ -367,13 +367,7 @@ void blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq) void blk_recount_segments(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio) { - unsigned short seg_cnt; - - /* estimate segment number by bi_vcnt for non-cloned bio */ - if (bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED)) - seg_cnt = bio_segments(bio); - else - seg_cnt = bio->bi_vcnt; + unsigned short seg_cnt = bio_segments(bio); if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE, &q->queue_flags) && (seg_cnt < queue_max_segments(q)))
It is wrong to use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out how many segments there are in the bio even though CLONED flag isn't set on this bio, because this bio may be splitted or advanced. So always use bio_segments() in blk_recount_segments(), and it shouldn't cause any performance loss now because the physical segment number is figured out in blk_queue_split() and BIO_SEG_VALID is set meantime since bdced438acd83ad83a6c ("block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting"). Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Fixes: 76d8137a3113 ("blk-merge: recaculate segment if it isn't less than max segments") Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> --- block/blk-merge.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)