similarity index 95%
rename from man/man2/ioctl_xfs_fsop_geometry.2
rename to man/man2/ioctl_xfs_geometry.2
@@ -3,18 +3,18 @@
.\" %%%LICENSE_START(GPLv2+_DOC_FULL)
.\" SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
.\" %%%LICENSE_END
-.TH IOCTL-XFS-FSOP-GEOMETRY 2 2019-06-17 "XFS"
+.TH IOCTL-XFS-GEOMETRY 2 2019-06-17 "XFS"
.SH NAME
-ioctl_xfs_fsop_geometry \- report XFS filesystem layout and features
+ioctl_xfs_geometry \- report XFS filesystem layout and features
.SH SYNOPSIS
.br
.B #include <xfs/xfs_fs.h>
.PP
-.BI "int ioctl(int " fd ", XFS_IOC_FSOP_GEOMETRY, struct xfs_fsop_geom*" arg );
+.BI "int ioctl(int " fd ", XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY, struct xfs_fsop_geom *" arg );
.br
-.BI "int ioctl(int " fd ", XFS_IOC_FSOP_GEOMETRY_V4, struct xfs_fsop_geom_v4 *" arg );
+.BI "int ioctl(int " fd ", XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY_V4, struct xfs_fsop_geom_v4 *" arg );
.br
-.BI "int ioctl(int " fd ", XFS_IOC_FSOP_GEOMETRY_V1, struct xfs_fsop_geom_v1 *" arg );
+.BI "int ioctl(int " fd ", XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY_V1, struct xfs_fsop_geom_v1 *" arg );
.SH DESCRIPTION
Report the details of an XFS filesystem layout, features, and other descriptive items.
This information is conveyed in a structure of the following form:
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ for more information.
.TP
.B XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY
See
-.BR ioctl_xfs_fsop_geometry (2)
+.BR ioctl_xfs_geometry (2)
for more information.
.TP
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ as they are not of general use to applications.
.SH SEE ALSO
.BR ioctl_xfs_fsgetxattr (2),
-.BR ioctl_xfs_fsop_geometry (2),
+.BR ioctl_xfs_geometry (2),
.BR ioctl_xfs_fsbulkstat (2),
.BR ioctl_xfs_scrub_metadata (2),
.BR ioctl_xfs_fsinumbers (2),
Somehow "fsop_/FSOP_" snuck into this manpage's name, filename, and ioctl name. It's not XFS_IOC_FSOP_GEOMETRY, it's XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY so change all references, including the man page name, filename, and references from xfsctl(3). (the structure and flags do have the fsop_ string, which certainly makes this a bit confusing) Fixes: b427c816847e ("man: create a separate GEOMETRY ioctl manpage") Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> --- Note the file rename below Do we need to install symlink from the old name or can we just wing this one and let "apropos" et al find it ...