From patchwork Fri May 3 16:30:28 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Stefano Garzarella X-Patchwork-Id: 10928985 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544D1912 for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 16:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A1E28620 for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 16:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 45D2128722; Fri, 3 May 2019 16:31:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB97D28620 for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 16:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43600 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMb6E-0004O8-4D for patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 12:31:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMb51-0003Ln-6V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 12:30:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMb50-0005Iv-9D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 12:30:35 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11837) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMb4y-00059c-3r; Fri, 03 May 2019 12:30:32 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48BCB90B18; Fri, 3 May 2019 16:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from steredhat.redhat.com (unknown [10.36.118.31]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5785C231; Fri, 3 May 2019 16:30:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Stefano Garzarella To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 18:30:28 +0200 Message-Id: <20190503163028.213823-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Fri, 03 May 2019 16:30:31 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] block/rbd: increase dynamically the image size X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , Josh Durgin , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP RBD APIs don't allow us to write more than the size set with rbd_create() or rbd_resize(). In order to support growing images (eg. qcow2), we resize the image before write operations that exceed the current size. Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella --- v2: - use bs->total_sectors instead of adding a new field [Kevin] - resize the image only during write operation [Kevin] for read operation, the bdrv_aligned_preadv() already handles reads that exceed the length returned by bdrv_getlength(), so IMHO we can avoid to handle it in the rbd driver --- block/rbd.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/rbd.c b/block/rbd.c index 0c549c9935..613e8f4982 100644 --- a/block/rbd.c +++ b/block/rbd.c @@ -934,13 +934,25 @@ static BlockAIOCB *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs, } switch (cmd) { - case RBD_AIO_WRITE: + case RBD_AIO_WRITE: { + /* + * RBD APIs don't allow us to write more than actual size, so in order + * to support growing images, we resize the image before write + * operations that exceed the current size. + */ + if (off + size > bs->total_sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) { + r = rbd_resize(s->image, off + size); + if (r < 0) { + goto failed_completion; + } + } #ifdef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC r = rbd_aio_writev(s->image, qiov->iov, qiov->niov, off, c); #else r = rbd_aio_write(s->image, off, size, rcb->buf, c); #endif break; + } case RBD_AIO_READ: #ifdef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC r = rbd_aio_readv(s->image, qiov->iov, qiov->niov, off, c);