From patchwork Wed May 22 06:20:55 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" X-Patchwork-Id: 10955171 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71EC14B6 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A0228B20 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id C9C8128B22; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1665128B20 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F6E212746EF; Tue, 21 May 2019 23:21:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Delivered-To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF0D72125F1EA for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 23:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x4M6HIXs047264 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 02:21:11 -0400 Received: from e17.ny.us.ibm.com (e17.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.207]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2smyx6jr74-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 02:21:10 -0400 Received: from localhost by e17.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 22 May 2019 07:21:10 +0100 Received: from b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.24) by e17.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.204) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 22 May 2019 07:21:07 +0100 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x4M6L6eh35193030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:06 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E37112066; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7CA3112063; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skywalker.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.124.31.87]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:04 +0000 (GMT) From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" To: dan.j.williams@intel.com Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm/nvdimm: Add PFN_MIN_VERSION support Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 11:50:55 +0530 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19052206-0040-0000-0000-000004F2D313 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00011141; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000286; SDB=6.01206843; UDB=6.00633755; IPR=6.00987819; MB=3.00026997; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-05-22 06:21:08 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19052206-0041-0000-0000-000008FEE6E3 Message-Id: <20190522062057.26581-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-05-22_03:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905220046 X-BeenThere: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP This allows us to make changes in a backward incompatible way. I have kept the PFN_MIN_VERSION in this patch '0' because we are not introducing any incompatible changes in this patch. We also may want to backport this to older kernels. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V --- drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h | 9 ++++++++- drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c | 4 ++++ drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h index dde9853453d3..1b10ae5773b6 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h @@ -20,6 +20,12 @@ #define PFN_SIG_LEN 16 #define PFN_SIG "NVDIMM_PFN_INFO\0" #define DAX_SIG "NVDIMM_DAX_INFO\0" +/* + * increment this when we are making changes such that older + * kernel should fail to initialize that namespace. + */ + +#define PFN_MIN_VERSION 0 struct nd_pfn_sb { u8 signature[PFN_SIG_LEN]; @@ -36,7 +42,8 @@ struct nd_pfn_sb { __le32 end_trunc; /* minor-version-2 record the base alignment of the mapping */ __le32 align; - u8 padding[4000]; + __le16 min_verison; + u8 padding[3998]; __le64 checksum; }; diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c index 01f40672507f..3250de70a7b3 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c @@ -439,6 +439,9 @@ int nd_pfn_validate(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, const char *sig) if (nvdimm_read_bytes(ndns, SZ_4K, pfn_sb, sizeof(*pfn_sb), 0)) return -ENXIO; + if (le16_to_cpu(pfn_sb->min_version > PFN_MIN_VERSION)) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + if (memcmp(pfn_sb->signature, sig, PFN_SIG_LEN) != 0) return -ENODEV; @@ -769,6 +772,7 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn) memcpy(pfn_sb->parent_uuid, nd_dev_to_uuid(&ndns->dev), 16); pfn_sb->version_major = cpu_to_le16(1); pfn_sb->version_minor = cpu_to_le16(2); + pfn_sb->min_version = cpu_to_le16(PFN_MIN_VERSION); pfn_sb->start_pad = cpu_to_le32(start_pad); pfn_sb->end_trunc = cpu_to_le32(end_trunc); pfn_sb->align = cpu_to_le32(nd_pfn->align); diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c index 845c5b430cdd..406427c064d9 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c @@ -490,6 +490,7 @@ static int pmem_attach_disk(struct device *dev, static int nd_pmem_probe(struct device *dev) { + int ret; struct nd_namespace_common *ndns; ndns = nvdimm_namespace_common_probe(dev); @@ -505,12 +506,29 @@ static int nd_pmem_probe(struct device *dev) if (is_nd_pfn(dev)) return pmem_attach_disk(dev, ndns); - /* if we find a valid info-block we'll come back as that personality */ - if (nd_btt_probe(dev, ndns) == 0 || nd_pfn_probe(dev, ndns) == 0 - || nd_dax_probe(dev, ndns) == 0) + ret = nd_btt_probe(dev, ndns); + if (ret == 0) return -ENXIO; + else if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) + return ret; - /* ...otherwise we're just a raw pmem device */ + ret = nd_pfn_probe(dev, ndns); + if (ret == 0) + return -ENXIO; + else if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) + return ret; + + ret = nd_dax_probe(dev, ndns); + if (ret == 0) + return -ENXIO; + else if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) + return ret; + /* + * We have two failure conditions here, there is no + * info reserver block or we found a valid info reserve block + * but failed to initialize the pfn superblock. + * Don't create a raw pmem disk for the second case. + */ return pmem_attach_disk(dev, ndns); } From patchwork Wed May 22 06:20:56 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" X-Patchwork-Id: 10955173 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8EF924 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA0128B20 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 7FC5128B22; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1209228B20 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D662127675C; Tue, 21 May 2019 23:21:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Delivered-To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41CC721959CB2 for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 23:21:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x4M6HInE047221 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 02:21:12 -0400 Received: from e17.ny.us.ibm.com (e17.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.207]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2smyx6jr7t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 02:21:12 -0400 Received: from localhost by e17.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 22 May 2019 07:21:11 +0100 Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.23) by e17.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.204) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 22 May 2019 07:21:09 +0100 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x4M6L80422085798 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:08 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044AC11206D; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C6B112062; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skywalker.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.124.31.87]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:06 +0000 (GMT) From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" To: dan.j.williams@intel.com Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm/nvdimm: Add page size and struct page size to pfn superblock Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 11:50:56 +0530 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190522062057.26581-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190522062057.26581-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19052206-0040-0000-0000-000004F2D316 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00011141; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000286; SDB=6.01206843; UDB=6.00633755; IPR=6.00987819; MB=3.00026997; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-05-22 06:21:10 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19052206-0041-0000-0000-000008FEE6E7 Message-Id: <20190522062057.26581-2-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-05-22_03:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905220046 X-BeenThere: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP This is needed so that we don't wrongly initialize a namespace which doesn't have enough space reserved for holding struct pages with the current kernel. We also increment PFN_MIN_VERSION to make sure that older kernel won't initialize namespace created with newer kernel. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V --- drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h | 9 ++++++--- drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h index 1b10ae5773b6..ba11738ca8a2 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ * kernel should fail to initialize that namespace. */ -#define PFN_MIN_VERSION 0 +#define PFN_MIN_VERSION 1 struct nd_pfn_sb { u8 signature[PFN_SIG_LEN]; @@ -42,8 +42,11 @@ struct nd_pfn_sb { __le32 end_trunc; /* minor-version-2 record the base alignment of the mapping */ __le32 align; - __le16 min_verison; - u8 padding[3998]; + __le16 min_version; + /* minor-version-3 record the page size and struct page size */ + __le16 page_struct_size; + __le32 page_size; + u8 padding[3992]; __le64 checksum; }; diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c index 3250de70a7b3..94918a4e6e73 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c @@ -462,6 +462,15 @@ int nd_pfn_validate(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, const char *sig) if (__le16_to_cpu(pfn_sb->version_minor) < 2) pfn_sb->align = 0; + if (__le16_to_cpu(pfn_sb->version_minor) < 3) { + /* + * For a large part we use PAGE_SIZE. But we + * do have some accounting code using SZ_4K. + */ + pfn_sb->page_struct_size = cpu_to_le16(64); + pfn_sb->page_size = cpu_to_le32(SZ_4K); + } + switch (le32_to_cpu(pfn_sb->mode)) { case PFN_MODE_RAM: case PFN_MODE_PMEM: @@ -477,6 +486,12 @@ int nd_pfn_validate(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, const char *sig) align = 1UL << ilog2(offset); mode = le32_to_cpu(pfn_sb->mode); + if (le32_to_cpu(pfn_sb->page_size) != PAGE_SIZE) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + + if (le16_to_cpu(pfn_sb->page_struct_size) != sizeof(struct page)) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + if (!nd_pfn->uuid) { /* * When probing a namepace via nd_pfn_probe() the uuid @@ -771,11 +786,13 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn) memcpy(pfn_sb->uuid, nd_pfn->uuid, 16); memcpy(pfn_sb->parent_uuid, nd_dev_to_uuid(&ndns->dev), 16); pfn_sb->version_major = cpu_to_le16(1); - pfn_sb->version_minor = cpu_to_le16(2); + pfn_sb->version_minor = cpu_to_le16(3); pfn_sb->min_version = cpu_to_le16(PFN_MIN_VERSION); pfn_sb->start_pad = cpu_to_le32(start_pad); pfn_sb->end_trunc = cpu_to_le32(end_trunc); pfn_sb->align = cpu_to_le32(nd_pfn->align); + pfn_sb->page_struct_size = cpu_to_le16(sizeof(struct page)); + pfn_sb->page_size = cpu_to_le32(PAGE_SIZE); checksum = nd_sb_checksum((struct nd_gen_sb *) pfn_sb); pfn_sb->checksum = cpu_to_le64(checksum); From patchwork Wed May 22 06:20:57 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" X-Patchwork-Id: 10955179 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE5F924 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4BB28B20 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id C1C6428B1F; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76EC828B1F for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D63721276760; Tue, 21 May 2019 23:21:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Delivered-To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D08A4212746C6 for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 23:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x4M6HIh1047238 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 02:21:14 -0400 Received: from e14.ny.us.ibm.com (e14.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.204]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2smyx6jr8e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 02:21:13 -0400 Received: from localhost by e14.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 22 May 2019 07:21:13 +0100 Received: from b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.26) by e14.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.201) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 22 May 2019 07:21:10 +0100 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x4M6L9Fs40108278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:09 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95A1112065; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4F3112062; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skywalker.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.124.31.87]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:08 +0000 (GMT) From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" To: dan.j.williams@intel.com Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm/nvdimm: Use correct #defines instead of opencoding Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 11:50:57 +0530 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190522062057.26581-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190522062057.26581-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19052206-0052-0000-0000-000003C54520 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00011141; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000286; SDB=6.01206843; UDB=6.00633755; IPR=6.00987819; MB=3.00026997; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-05-22 06:21:12 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19052206-0053-0000-0000-000060FF565F Message-Id: <20190522062057.26581-3-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-05-22_03:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905220046 X-BeenThere: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP The nfpn related change is needed to fix the kernel message "number of pfns truncated from 2617344 to 163584" The change makes sure the nfpns stored in the superblock is right value. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V --- drivers/nvdimm/label.c | 2 +- drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c | 6 +++--- drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c | 8 ++++---- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c index f3d753d3169c..bc6de8fb0153 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static bool slot_valid(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, /* check that DPA allocations are page aligned */ if ((__le64_to_cpu(nd_label->dpa) - | __le64_to_cpu(nd_label->rawsize)) % SZ_4K) + | __le64_to_cpu(nd_label->rawsize)) % PAGE_SIZE) return false; /* check checksum */ diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c index 94918a4e6e73..f549bddc680c 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c @@ -765,8 +765,8 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn) * when populating the vmemmap. This *should* be equal to * PMD_SIZE for most architectures. */ - offset = ALIGN(start + reserve + 64 * npfns, - max(nd_pfn->align, PMD_SIZE)) - start; + offset = ALIGN(start + reserve + sizeof(struct page) * npfns, + max(nd_pfn->align, PMD_SIZE)) - start; } else if (nd_pfn->mode == PFN_MODE_RAM) offset = ALIGN(start + reserve, nd_pfn->align) - start; else @@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn) return -ENXIO; } - npfns = (size - offset - start_pad - end_trunc) / SZ_4K; + npfns = (size - offset - start_pad - end_trunc) / PAGE_SIZE; pfn_sb->mode = cpu_to_le32(nd_pfn->mode); pfn_sb->dataoff = cpu_to_le64(offset); pfn_sb->npfns = cpu_to_le64(npfns); diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c index b4ef7d9ff22e..2d8facea5a03 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c @@ -994,10 +994,10 @@ static struct nd_region *nd_region_create(struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus, struct nd_mapping_desc *mapping = &ndr_desc->mapping[i]; struct nvdimm *nvdimm = mapping->nvdimm; - if ((mapping->start | mapping->size) % SZ_4K) { - dev_err(&nvdimm_bus->dev, "%s: %s mapping%d is not 4K aligned\n", - caller, dev_name(&nvdimm->dev), i); - + if ((mapping->start | mapping->size) % PAGE_SIZE) { + dev_err(&nvdimm_bus->dev, + "%s: %s mapping%d is not 4K aligned\n", + caller, dev_name(&nvdimm->dev), i); return NULL; }