From patchwork Fri Jun 28 02:19:24 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thiago Jung Bauermann X-Patchwork-Id: 11021113 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E75A1908 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC99286A7 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 02692285F0; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85B7285F0 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726793AbfF1CU3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:29 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:34142 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726506AbfF1CU2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:28 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2GWVX098034; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:19:57 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td9m2rwe4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:19:57 -0400 Received: from m0098410.ppops.net (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2Ge4p098387; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:19:56 -0400 Received: from ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (fd.55.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.85.253]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td9m2rwdj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:19:56 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2JV5H031813; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:19:55 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.27]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2t9by7anqc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:19:55 +0000 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5S2Jt7i19398924 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:19:55 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18003112061; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:19:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E983F112062; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:19:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from morokweng.localdomain.com (unknown [9.85.218.134]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:19:50 +0000 (GMT) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , David Howells , David Woodhouse , Jessica Yu , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , Thiago Jung Bauermann Subject: [PATCH v12 01/11] MODSIGN: Export module signature definitions Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:19:24 -0300 Message-Id: <20190628021934.4260-2-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-27_15:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906280019 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP IMA will use the module_signature format for append signatures, so export the relevant definitions and factor out the code which verifies that the appended signature trailer is valid. Also, create a CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORMAT option so that IMA can select it and be able to use mod_check_sig() without having to depend on either CONFIG_MODULE_SIG or CONFIG_MODULES. Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar Cc: Jessica Yu Acked-by: Jessica Yu Reviewed-by: Philipp Rudo --- include/linux/module.h | 3 -- include/linux/module_signature.h | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ init/Kconfig | 6 +++- kernel/Makefile | 1 + kernel/module.c | 1 + kernel/module_signature.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/module_signing.c | 56 +++++--------------------------- scripts/Makefile | 2 +- 8 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h index 188998d3dca9..aa56f531cf1e 100644 --- a/include/linux/module.h +++ b/include/linux/module.h @@ -25,9 +25,6 @@ #include #include -/* In stripped ARM and x86-64 modules, ~ is surprisingly rare. */ -#define MODULE_SIG_STRING "~Module signature appended~\n" - /* Not Yet Implemented */ #define MODULE_SUPPORTED_DEVICE(name) diff --git a/include/linux/module_signature.h b/include/linux/module_signature.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..523617fc5b6a --- /dev/null +++ b/include/linux/module_signature.h @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */ +/* + * Module signature handling. + * + * Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved. + * Written by David Howells (dhowells@redhat.com) + */ + +#ifndef _LINUX_MODULE_SIGNATURE_H +#define _LINUX_MODULE_SIGNATURE_H + +/* In stripped ARM and x86-64 modules, ~ is surprisingly rare. */ +#define MODULE_SIG_STRING "~Module signature appended~\n" + +enum pkey_id_type { + PKEY_ID_PGP, /* OpenPGP generated key ID */ + PKEY_ID_X509, /* X.509 arbitrary subjectKeyIdentifier */ + PKEY_ID_PKCS7, /* Signature in PKCS#7 message */ +}; + +/* + * Module signature information block. + * + * The constituents of the signature section are, in order: + * + * - Signer's name + * - Key identifier + * - Signature data + * - Information block + */ +struct module_signature { + u8 algo; /* Public-key crypto algorithm [0] */ + u8 hash; /* Digest algorithm [0] */ + u8 id_type; /* Key identifier type [PKEY_ID_PKCS7] */ + u8 signer_len; /* Length of signer's name [0] */ + u8 key_id_len; /* Length of key identifier [0] */ + u8 __pad[3]; + __be32 sig_len; /* Length of signature data */ +}; + +int mod_check_sig(const struct module_signature *ms, size_t file_len, + const char *name); + +#endif /* _LINUX_MODULE_SIGNATURE_H */ diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig index 8b9ffe236e4f..c2286a3c74c5 100644 --- a/init/Kconfig +++ b/init/Kconfig @@ -1852,6 +1852,10 @@ config BASE_SMALL default 0 if BASE_FULL default 1 if !BASE_FULL +config MODULE_SIG_FORMAT + def_bool n + select SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION + menuconfig MODULES bool "Enable loadable module support" option modules @@ -1929,7 +1933,7 @@ config MODULE_SRCVERSION_ALL config MODULE_SIG bool "Module signature verification" depends on MODULES - select SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION + select MODULE_SIG_FORMAT help Check modules for valid signatures upon load: the signature is simply appended to the module. For more information see diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile index 33824f0385b3..f29ae2997a43 100644 --- a/kernel/Makefile +++ b/kernel/Makefile @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ endif obj-$(CONFIG_UID16) += uid16.o obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES) += module.o obj-$(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG) += module_signing.o +obj-$(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORMAT) += module_signature.o obj-$(CONFIG_KALLSYMS) += kallsyms.o obj-$(CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT) += acct.o obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_CORE) += crash_core.o diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c index 6e6712b3aaf5..2712f4d217f5 100644 --- a/kernel/module.c +++ b/kernel/module.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include diff --git a/kernel/module_signature.c b/kernel/module_signature.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..4224a1086b7d --- /dev/null +++ b/kernel/module_signature.c @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ +/* + * Module signature checker + * + * Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved. + * Written by David Howells (dhowells@redhat.com) + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include + +/** + * mod_check_sig - check that the given signature is sane + * + * @ms: Signature to check. + * @file_len: Size of the file to which @ms is appended. + * @name: What is being checked. Used for error messages. + */ +int mod_check_sig(const struct module_signature *ms, size_t file_len, + const char *name) +{ + if (be32_to_cpu(ms->sig_len) >= file_len - sizeof(*ms)) + return -EBADMSG; + + if (ms->id_type != PKEY_ID_PKCS7) { + pr_err("%s: Module is not signed with expected PKCS#7 message\n", + name); + return -ENOPKG; + } + + if (ms->algo != 0 || + ms->hash != 0 || + ms->signer_len != 0 || + ms->key_id_len != 0 || + ms->__pad[0] != 0 || + ms->__pad[1] != 0 || + ms->__pad[2] != 0) { + pr_err("%s: PKCS#7 signature info has unexpected non-zero params\n", + name); + return -EBADMSG; + } + + return 0; +} diff --git a/kernel/module_signing.c b/kernel/module_signing.c index 6b9a926fd86b..cdd04a6b8074 100644 --- a/kernel/module_signing.c +++ b/kernel/module_signing.c @@ -11,37 +11,13 @@ #include #include +#include +#include #include #include #include #include "module-internal.h" -enum pkey_id_type { - PKEY_ID_PGP, /* OpenPGP generated key ID */ - PKEY_ID_X509, /* X.509 arbitrary subjectKeyIdentifier */ - PKEY_ID_PKCS7, /* Signature in PKCS#7 message */ -}; - -/* - * Module signature information block. - * - * The constituents of the signature section are, in order: - * - * - Signer's name - * - Key identifier - * - Signature data - * - Information block - */ -struct module_signature { - u8 algo; /* Public-key crypto algorithm [0] */ - u8 hash; /* Digest algorithm [0] */ - u8 id_type; /* Key identifier type [PKEY_ID_PKCS7] */ - u8 signer_len; /* Length of signer's name [0] */ - u8 key_id_len; /* Length of key identifier [0] */ - u8 __pad[3]; - __be32 sig_len; /* Length of signature data */ -}; - /* * Verify the signature on a module. */ @@ -49,6 +25,7 @@ int mod_verify_sig(const void *mod, struct load_info *info) { struct module_signature ms; size_t sig_len, modlen = info->len; + int ret; pr_devel("==>%s(,%zu)\n", __func__, modlen); @@ -56,32 +33,15 @@ int mod_verify_sig(const void *mod, struct load_info *info) return -EBADMSG; memcpy(&ms, mod + (modlen - sizeof(ms)), sizeof(ms)); - modlen -= sizeof(ms); + + ret = mod_check_sig(&ms, modlen, info->name); + if (ret) + return ret; sig_len = be32_to_cpu(ms.sig_len); - if (sig_len >= modlen) - return -EBADMSG; - modlen -= sig_len; + modlen -= sig_len + sizeof(ms); info->len = modlen; - if (ms.id_type != PKEY_ID_PKCS7) { - pr_err("%s: Module is not signed with expected PKCS#7 message\n", - info->name); - return -ENOPKG; - } - - if (ms.algo != 0 || - ms.hash != 0 || - ms.signer_len != 0 || - ms.key_id_len != 0 || - ms.__pad[0] != 0 || - ms.__pad[1] != 0 || - ms.__pad[2] != 0) { - pr_err("%s: PKCS#7 signature info has unexpected non-zero params\n", - info->name); - return -EBADMSG; - } - return verify_pkcs7_signature(mod, modlen, mod + modlen, sig_len, VERIFY_USE_SECONDARY_KEYRING, VERIFYING_MODULE_SIGNATURE, diff --git a/scripts/Makefile b/scripts/Makefile index 9d442ee050bd..52098b080ab7 100644 --- a/scripts/Makefile +++ b/scripts/Makefile @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ hostprogs-$(CONFIG_VT) += conmakehash hostprogs-$(BUILD_C_RECORDMCOUNT) += recordmcount hostprogs-$(CONFIG_BUILDTIME_EXTABLE_SORT) += sortextable hostprogs-$(CONFIG_ASN1) += asn1_compiler -hostprogs-$(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG) += sign-file +hostprogs-$(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORMAT) += sign-file hostprogs-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING) += extract-cert hostprogs-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_EXTRA_CERTIFICATE) += insert-sys-cert From patchwork Fri Jun 28 02:19:25 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thiago Jung Bauermann X-Patchwork-Id: 11021087 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DD21398 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7344D28748 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 65EE028780; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0B228748 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726672AbfF1CUI (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:08 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:45190 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726664AbfF1CUH (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:07 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2Gb1H107970 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:06 -0400 Received: from e16.ny.us.ibm.com (e16.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.206]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td8w6aaq2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:06 -0400 Received: from localhost by e16.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 03:20:05 +0100 Received: from b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.24) by e16.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.203) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 28 Jun 2019 03:20:00 +0100 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5S2JxtH45482458 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:19:59 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2BA112066; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:19:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFB2112061; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:19:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from morokweng.localdomain.com (unknown [9.85.218.134]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:19:55 +0000 (GMT) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , David Howells , David Woodhouse , Jessica Yu , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , Thiago Jung Bauermann Subject: [PATCH v12 02/11] PKCS#7: Refactor verify_pkcs7_signature() Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:19:25 -0300 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19062802-0072-0000-0000-0000044205B1 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00011344; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000286; SDB=6.01224269; UDB=6.00644347; IPR=6.01005459; MB=3.00027497; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-06-28 02:20:05 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19062802-0073-0000-0000-00004CB234A2 Message-Id: <20190628021934.4260-3-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-27_15:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=3 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906280019 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP IMA will need to verify a PKCS#7 signature which has already been parsed. For this reason, factor out the code which does that from verify_pkcs7_signature() into a new function which takes a struct pkcs7_message instead of a data buffer. Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar Cc: David Howells Cc: David Woodhouse Cc: Herbert Xu Cc: "David S. Miller" --- certs/system_keyring.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- include/linux/verification.h | 10 ++++++ 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/certs/system_keyring.c b/certs/system_keyring.c index c05c29ae4d5d..4ba82e52e4b4 100644 --- a/certs/system_keyring.c +++ b/certs/system_keyring.c @@ -194,33 +194,27 @@ late_initcall(load_system_certificate_list); #ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION /** - * verify_pkcs7_signature - Verify a PKCS#7-based signature on system data. + * verify_pkcs7_message_sig - Verify a PKCS#7-based signature on system data. * @data: The data to be verified (NULL if expecting internal data). * @len: Size of @data. - * @raw_pkcs7: The PKCS#7 message that is the signature. - * @pkcs7_len: The size of @raw_pkcs7. + * @pkcs7: The PKCS#7 message that is the signature. * @trusted_keys: Trusted keys to use (NULL for builtin trusted keys only, * (void *)1UL for all trusted keys). * @usage: The use to which the key is being put. * @view_content: Callback to gain access to content. * @ctx: Context for callback. */ -int verify_pkcs7_signature(const void *data, size_t len, - const void *raw_pkcs7, size_t pkcs7_len, - struct key *trusted_keys, - enum key_being_used_for usage, - int (*view_content)(void *ctx, - const void *data, size_t len, - size_t asn1hdrlen), - void *ctx) +int verify_pkcs7_message_sig(const void *data, size_t len, + struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, + struct key *trusted_keys, + enum key_being_used_for usage, + int (*view_content)(void *ctx, + const void *data, size_t len, + size_t asn1hdrlen), + void *ctx) { - struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7; int ret; - pkcs7 = pkcs7_parse_message(raw_pkcs7, pkcs7_len); - if (IS_ERR(pkcs7)) - return PTR_ERR(pkcs7); - /* The data should be detached - so we need to supply it. */ if (data && pkcs7_supply_detached_data(pkcs7, data, len) < 0) { pr_err("PKCS#7 signature with non-detached data\n"); @@ -273,6 +267,41 @@ int verify_pkcs7_signature(const void *data, size_t len, } error: + pr_devel("<==%s() = %d\n", __func__, ret); + return ret; +} + +/** + * verify_pkcs7_signature - Verify a PKCS#7-based signature on system data. + * @data: The data to be verified (NULL if expecting internal data). + * @len: Size of @data. + * @raw_pkcs7: The PKCS#7 message that is the signature. + * @pkcs7_len: The size of @raw_pkcs7. + * @trusted_keys: Trusted keys to use (NULL for builtin trusted keys only, + * (void *)1UL for all trusted keys). + * @usage: The use to which the key is being put. + * @view_content: Callback to gain access to content. + * @ctx: Context for callback. + */ +int verify_pkcs7_signature(const void *data, size_t len, + const void *raw_pkcs7, size_t pkcs7_len, + struct key *trusted_keys, + enum key_being_used_for usage, + int (*view_content)(void *ctx, + const void *data, size_t len, + size_t asn1hdrlen), + void *ctx) +{ + struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7; + int ret; + + pkcs7 = pkcs7_parse_message(raw_pkcs7, pkcs7_len); + if (IS_ERR(pkcs7)) + return PTR_ERR(pkcs7); + + ret = verify_pkcs7_message_sig(data, len, pkcs7, trusted_keys, usage, + view_content, ctx); + pkcs7_free_message(pkcs7); pr_devel("<==%s() = %d\n", __func__, ret); return ret; diff --git a/include/linux/verification.h b/include/linux/verification.h index 018fb5f13d44..5e1d41f2b336 100644 --- a/include/linux/verification.h +++ b/include/linux/verification.h @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ extern const char *const key_being_used_for[NR__KEY_BEING_USED_FOR]; #ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION struct key; +struct pkcs7_message; extern int verify_pkcs7_signature(const void *data, size_t len, const void *raw_pkcs7, size_t pkcs7_len, @@ -45,6 +46,15 @@ extern int verify_pkcs7_signature(const void *data, size_t len, const void *data, size_t len, size_t asn1hdrlen), void *ctx); +extern int verify_pkcs7_message_sig(const void *data, size_t len, + struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, + struct key *trusted_keys, + enum key_being_used_for usage, + int (*view_content)(void *ctx, + const void *data, + size_t len, + size_t asn1hdrlen), + void *ctx); #ifdef CONFIG_SIGNED_PE_FILE_VERIFICATION extern int verify_pefile_signature(const void *pebuf, unsigned pelen, From patchwork Fri Jun 28 02:19:26 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thiago Jung Bauermann X-Patchwork-Id: 11021099 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC571398 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D62201BD for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id D444E28385; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F825201BD for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726559AbfF1CU2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:28 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:47656 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726476AbfF1CU2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:28 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2GWQx098045; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:06 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td9m2rwk0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:05 -0400 Received: from m0098410.ppops.net (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2GaTD098244; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:05 -0400 Received: from ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (7a.29.35a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.53.41.122]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td9m2rwje-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:05 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2JUro006238; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:04 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.28]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2t9by7ap7m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:04 +0000 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5S2K3jd51708168 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:03 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5323E112064; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D989112061; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from morokweng.localdomain.com (unknown [9.85.218.134]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:19:59 +0000 (GMT) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , David Howells , David Woodhouse , Jessica Yu , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , Thiago Jung Bauermann Subject: [PATCH v12 03/11] PKCS#7: Introduce pkcs7_get_digest() Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:19:26 -0300 Message-Id: <20190628021934.4260-4-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-27_15:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906280019 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP IMA will need to access the digest of the PKCS7 message (as calculated by the kernel) before the signature is verified, so introduce pkcs7_get_digest() for that purpose. Also, modify pkcs7_digest() to detect when the digest was already calculated so that it doesn't have to do redundant work. Verifying that sinfo->sig->digest isn't NULL is sufficient because both places which allocate sinfo->sig (pkcs7_parse_message() and pkcs7_note_signed_info()) use kzalloc() so sig->digest is always initialized to zero. Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar Cc: David Howells Cc: David Woodhouse Cc: Herbert Xu Cc: "David S. Miller" --- crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_verify.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/crypto/pkcs7.h | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+) diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_verify.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_verify.c index f7b0980bf02d..3243981152b5 100644 --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_verify.c +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_verify.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include "pkcs7_parser.h" @@ -33,6 +34,10 @@ static int pkcs7_digest(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, kenter(",%u,%s", sinfo->index, sinfo->sig->hash_algo); + /* The digest was calculated already. */ + if (sig->digest) + return 0; + if (!sinfo->sig->hash_algo) return -ENOPKG; @@ -121,6 +126,34 @@ static int pkcs7_digest(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, return ret; } +int pkcs7_get_digest(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, const u8 **buf, u32 *len, + enum hash_algo *hash_algo) +{ + struct pkcs7_signed_info *sinfo = pkcs7->signed_infos; + int i, ret; + + /* + * This function doesn't support messages with more than one signature. + */ + if (sinfo == NULL || sinfo->next != NULL) + return -EBADMSG; + + ret = pkcs7_digest(pkcs7, sinfo); + if (ret) + return ret; + + *buf = sinfo->sig->digest; + *len = sinfo->sig->digest_size; + + for (i = 0; i < HASH_ALGO__LAST; i++) + if (!strcmp(hash_algo_name[i], sinfo->sig->hash_algo)) { + *hash_algo = i; + break; + } + + return 0; +} + /* * Find the key (X.509 certificate) to use to verify a PKCS#7 message. PKCS#7 * uses the issuer's name and the issuing certificate serial number for diff --git a/include/crypto/pkcs7.h b/include/crypto/pkcs7.h index 583f199400a3..3bfe6829eaae 100644 --- a/include/crypto/pkcs7.h +++ b/include/crypto/pkcs7.h @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ #define _CRYPTO_PKCS7_H #include +#include #include struct key; @@ -44,4 +45,7 @@ extern int pkcs7_verify(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, extern int pkcs7_supply_detached_data(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, const void *data, size_t datalen); +extern int pkcs7_get_digest(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, const u8 **buf, + u32 *len, enum hash_algo *hash_algo); + #endif /* _CRYPTO_PKCS7_H */ From patchwork Fri Jun 28 02:19:27 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thiago Jung Bauermann X-Patchwork-Id: 11021093 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9041398 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7D028748 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 71D0728782; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1442D28748 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726719AbfF1CUP (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:15 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:35060 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726586AbfF1CUP (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:15 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2GbLF107983 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:14 -0400 Received: from e14.ny.us.ibm.com (e14.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.204]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td8w6aats-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:13 -0400 Received: from localhost by e14.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 03:20:13 +0100 Received: from b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.25) by e14.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.201) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 28 Jun 2019 03:20:08 +0100 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5S2K7oN52363742 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:07 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817D6112062; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15A0112067; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from morokweng.localdomain.com (unknown [9.85.218.134]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:03 +0000 (GMT) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , David Howells , David Woodhouse , Jessica Yu , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , Thiago Jung Bauermann Subject: [PATCH v12 04/11] integrity: Select CONFIG_KEYS instead of depending on it Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:19:27 -0300 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19062802-0052-0000-0000-000003D7411E X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00011344; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000286; SDB=6.01224269; UDB=6.00644348; IPR=6.01005460; MB=3.00027497; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-06-28 02:20:12 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19062802-0053-0000-0000-0000617CC278 Message-Id: <20190628021934.4260-5-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-27_15:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=963 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906280019 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP This avoids a dependency cycle in soon-to-be-introduced CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG: it will select CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORMAT which in turn selects CONFIG_KEYS. Kconfig then complains that CONFIG_INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE depends on CONFIG_KEYS. Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/Kconfig b/security/integrity/Kconfig index 3ba1168b1756..93d73902c571 100644 --- a/security/integrity/Kconfig +++ b/security/integrity/Kconfig @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ if INTEGRITY config INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE bool "Digital signature verification using multiple keyrings" - depends on KEYS default n + select KEYS select SIGNATURE help This option enables digital signature verification support From patchwork Fri Jun 28 02:19:28 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thiago Jung Bauermann X-Patchwork-Id: 11021149 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539B117D2 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A982874C for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 35BCD28780; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD76328748 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726865AbfF1CUl (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:41 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:20726 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726859AbfF1CUj (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:39 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2I3fg026032; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:14 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td8xhj8ch-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:14 -0400 Received: from m0098394.ppops.net (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2KD70045408; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:13 -0400 Received: from ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (83.d6.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.214.131]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td8xhj8bt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:13 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2JYlV031936; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:12 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.29]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2t9by7jp17-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:12 +0000 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5S2KBlC12190118 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:11 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D066112065; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D497E112063; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from morokweng.localdomain.com (unknown [9.85.218.134]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:07 +0000 (GMT) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , David Howells , David Woodhouse , Jessica Yu , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , Thiago Jung Bauermann Subject: [PATCH v12 05/11] ima: Add modsig appraise_type option for module-style appended signatures Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:19:28 -0300 Message-Id: <20190628021934.4260-6-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-27_15:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906280019 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Introduce the modsig keyword to the IMA policy syntax to specify that a given hook should expect the file to have the IMA signature appended to it. Here is how it can be used in a rule: appraise func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK appraise_type=imasig|modsig With this rule, IMA will accept either a signature stored in the extended attribute or an appended signature. For now, the rule above will behave exactly the same as if appraise_type=imasig was specified. The actual modsig implementation will be introduced separately. Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy | 6 +++++- security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 10 +++++++++ security/integrity/ima/Makefile | 1 + security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 9 ++++++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 12 +++++++++-- security/integrity/integrity.h | 1 + 7 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy index fc376a323908..29ebe9afdac4 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Description: euid:= decimal value fowner:= decimal value lsm: are LSM specific - option: appraise_type:= [imasig] + option: appraise_type:= [imasig] [imasig|modsig] template:= name of a defined IMA template type (eg, ima-ng). Only valid when action is "measure". pcr:= decimal value @@ -105,3 +105,7 @@ Description: measure func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK pcr=4 measure func=KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK pcr=5 + + Example of appraise rule allowing modsig appended signatures: + + appraise func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK appraise_type=imasig|modsig diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig index df65d2d41905..6fa78fbc8c30 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig +++ b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig @@ -232,6 +232,16 @@ config IMA_APPRAISE_BOOTPARAM This option enables the different "ima_appraise=" modes (eg. fix, log) from the boot command line. +config IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG + bool "Support module-style signatures for appraisal" + depends on IMA_APPRAISE + default n + help + Adds support for signatures appended to files. The format of the + appended signature is the same used for signed kernel modules. + The modsig keyword can be used in the IMA policy to allow a hook + to accept such signatures. + config IMA_TRUSTED_KEYRING bool "Require all keys on the .ima keyring be signed (deprecated)" depends on IMA_APPRAISE && SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Makefile b/security/integrity/ima/Makefile index d921dc4f9eb0..31d57cdf2421 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/Makefile +++ b/security/integrity/ima/Makefile @@ -9,5 +9,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_IMA) += ima.o ima-y := ima_fs.o ima_queue.o ima_init.o ima_main.o ima_crypto.o ima_api.o \ ima_policy.o ima_template.o ima_template_lib.o ima-$(CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE) += ima_appraise.o +ima-$(CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG) += ima_modsig.o ima-$(CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC) += ima_kexec.o obj-$(CONFIG_IMA_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += ima_mok.o diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index 6aa28ab53d27..904f7dd78007 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -306,6 +306,15 @@ static inline int ima_read_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, #endif /* CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE */ +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG +bool ima_hook_supports_modsig(enum ima_hooks func); +#else +static inline bool ima_hook_supports_modsig(enum ima_hooks func) +{ + return false; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG */ + /* LSM based policy rules require audit */ #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..87503bfe8c8b --- /dev/null +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ +/* + * IMA support for appraising module-style appended signatures. + * + * Copyright (C) 2019 IBM Corporation + * + * Author: + * Thiago Jung Bauermann + */ + +#include "ima.h" + +/** + * ima_hook_supports_modsig - can the policy allow modsig for this hook? + * + * modsig is only supported by hooks using ima_post_read_file(), because only + * they preload the contents of the file in a buffer. FILE_CHECK does that in + * some cases, but not when reached from vfs_open(). POLICY_CHECK can support + * it, but it's not useful in practice because it's a text file so deny. + */ +bool ima_hook_supports_modsig(enum ima_hooks func) +{ + switch (func) { + case KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK: + case KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK: + case MODULE_CHECK: + return true; + default: + return false; + } +} diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index a3058b03a955..ac258df2f1f4 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -1132,6 +1132,10 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) ima_log_string(ab, "appraise_type", args[0].from); if ((strcmp(args[0].from, "imasig")) == 0) entry->flags |= IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED; + else if (ima_hook_supports_modsig(entry->func) && + strcmp(args[0].from, "imasig|modsig") == 0) + entry->flags |= IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED | + IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED; else result = -EINVAL; break; @@ -1451,8 +1455,12 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) } if (entry->template) seq_printf(m, "template=%s ", entry->template->name); - if (entry->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) - seq_puts(m, "appraise_type=imasig "); + if (entry->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) { + if (entry->flags & IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED) + seq_puts(m, "appraise_type=imasig|modsig "); + else + seq_puts(m, "appraise_type=imasig "); + } if (entry->flags & IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO) seq_puts(m, "permit_directio "); rcu_read_unlock(); diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity.h b/security/integrity/integrity.h index 88a29f72a74f..0e7330a36a9d 100644 --- a/security/integrity/integrity.h +++ b/security/integrity/integrity.h @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ #define IMA_NEW_FILE 0x04000000 #define EVM_IMMUTABLE_DIGSIG 0x08000000 #define IMA_FAIL_UNVERIFIABLE_SIGS 0x10000000 +#define IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED 0x20000000 #define IMA_DO_MASK (IMA_MEASURE | IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_AUDIT | \ IMA_HASH | IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK) From patchwork Fri Jun 28 02:19:29 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thiago Jung Bauermann X-Patchwork-Id: 11021143 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823F017D2 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759C528748 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 693902877B; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B9528748 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727014AbfF1CVG (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:21:06 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:43808 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726867AbfF1CUl (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:41 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2H1gN135698; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:18 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td71fe5g0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:17 -0400 Received: from m0098404.ppops.net (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2HaN5141524; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:17 -0400 Received: from ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (b.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.11]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td71fe5fb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:17 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2JYKs017193; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:16 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.26]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2t9by7jjp8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:15 +0000 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5S2KF7l28246448 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:15 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33562112065; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B362F112062; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from morokweng.localdomain.com (unknown [9.85.218.134]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:11 +0000 (GMT) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , David Howells , David Woodhouse , Jessica Yu , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , Thiago Jung Bauermann Subject: [PATCH v12 06/11] ima: Factor xattr_verify() out of ima_appraise_measurement() Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:19:29 -0300 Message-Id: <20190628021934.4260-7-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-27_15:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906280019 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Verify xattr signature in a separate function so that the logic in ima_appraise_measurement() remains clear when it gains the ability to also verify an appended module signature. The code in the switch statement is unchanged except for having to dereference the status and cause variables (since they're now pointers), and fixing the style of a block comment to appease checkpatch. Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 141 +++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 18bbe753421a..5d4772f39757 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -202,6 +202,83 @@ int ima_read_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, return ret; } +/* + * xattr_verify - verify xattr digest or signature + * + * Verify whether the hash or signature matches the file contents. + * + * Return 0 on success, error code otherwise. + */ +static int xattr_verify(enum ima_hooks func, struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, + struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value, int xattr_len, + enum integrity_status *status, const char **cause) +{ + int rc = -EINVAL, hash_start = 0; + + switch (xattr_value->type) { + case IMA_XATTR_DIGEST_NG: + /* first byte contains algorithm id */ + hash_start = 1; + /* fall through */ + case IMA_XATTR_DIGEST: + if (iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) { + *cause = "IMA-signature-required"; + *status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; + break; + } + clear_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags); + if (xattr_len - sizeof(xattr_value->type) - hash_start >= + iint->ima_hash->length) + /* + * xattr length may be longer. md5 hash in previous + * version occupied 20 bytes in xattr, instead of 16 + */ + rc = memcmp(&xattr_value->data[hash_start], + iint->ima_hash->digest, + iint->ima_hash->length); + else + rc = -EINVAL; + if (rc) { + *cause = "invalid-hash"; + *status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; + break; + } + *status = INTEGRITY_PASS; + break; + case EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG: + set_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags); + rc = integrity_digsig_verify(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_IMA, + (const char *)xattr_value, + xattr_len, + iint->ima_hash->digest, + iint->ima_hash->length); + if (rc == -EOPNOTSUPP) { + *status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN; + break; + } + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING) && rc && + func == KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK) + rc = integrity_digsig_verify(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_PLATFORM, + (const char *)xattr_value, + xattr_len, + iint->ima_hash->digest, + iint->ima_hash->length); + if (rc) { + *cause = "invalid-signature"; + *status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; + } else { + *status = INTEGRITY_PASS; + } + break; + default: + *status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN; + *cause = "unknown-ima-data"; + break; + } + + return rc; +} + /* * ima_appraise_measurement - appraise file measurement * @@ -221,7 +298,7 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, struct dentry *dentry = file_dentry(file); struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry); enum integrity_status status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN; - int rc = xattr_len, hash_start = 0; + int rc = xattr_len; if (!(inode->i_opflags & IOP_XATTR)) return INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN; @@ -259,65 +336,9 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, WARN_ONCE(true, "Unexpected integrity status %d\n", status); } - switch (xattr_value->type) { - case IMA_XATTR_DIGEST_NG: - /* first byte contains algorithm id */ - hash_start = 1; - /* fall through */ - case IMA_XATTR_DIGEST: - if (iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) { - cause = "IMA-signature-required"; - status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; - break; - } - clear_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags); - if (xattr_len - sizeof(xattr_value->type) - hash_start >= - iint->ima_hash->length) - /* xattr length may be longer. md5 hash in previous - version occupied 20 bytes in xattr, instead of 16 - */ - rc = memcmp(&xattr_value->data[hash_start], - iint->ima_hash->digest, - iint->ima_hash->length); - else - rc = -EINVAL; - if (rc) { - cause = "invalid-hash"; - status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; - break; - } - status = INTEGRITY_PASS; - break; - case EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG: - set_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags); - rc = integrity_digsig_verify(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_IMA, - (const char *)xattr_value, - xattr_len, - iint->ima_hash->digest, - iint->ima_hash->length); - if (rc == -EOPNOTSUPP) { - status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN; - break; - } - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING) && rc && - func == KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK) - rc = integrity_digsig_verify(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_PLATFORM, - (const char *)xattr_value, - xattr_len, - iint->ima_hash->digest, - iint->ima_hash->length); - if (rc) { - cause = "invalid-signature"; - status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; - } else { - status = INTEGRITY_PASS; - } - break; - default: - status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN; - cause = "unknown-ima-data"; - break; - } + if (xattr_value) + rc = xattr_verify(func, iint, xattr_value, xattr_len, &status, + &cause); out: /* From patchwork Fri Jun 28 02:19:30 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thiago Jung Bauermann X-Patchwork-Id: 11021123 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB0176 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC44828564 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id C04B3285FB; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABA028564 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726574AbfF1CUt (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:49 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:64490 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726895AbfF1CUn (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:43 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2GWYr098019; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:21 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td9m2rwu4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:21 -0400 Received: from m0098410.ppops.net (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2GaNg098268; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:21 -0400 Received: from ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (7a.29.35a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.53.41.122]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td9m2rwtg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:21 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2JUsR006228; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:20 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.23]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2t9by7ap98-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:20 +0000 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5S2KJGM43647466 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:19 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8CF112065; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889EA112062; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from morokweng.localdomain.com (unknown [9.85.218.134]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:15 +0000 (GMT) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , David Howells , David Woodhouse , Jessica Yu , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , Thiago Jung Bauermann Subject: [PATCH v12 07/11] ima: Implement support for module-style appended signatures Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:19:30 -0300 Message-Id: <20190628021934.4260-8-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-27_15:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=3 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906280019 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Implement the appraise_type=imasig|modsig option, allowing IMA to read and verify modsig signatures. In case a file has both an xattr signature and an appended modsig, IMA will only use the appended signature if the key used by the xattr signature isn't present in the IMA or platform keyring. Because modsig verification needs to convert from an integrity keyring id to the keyring itself, add an integrity_keyring_from_id() function in digsig.c so that integrity_modsig_verify() can use it. Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/digsig.c | 43 ++++++++++++---- security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 3 ++ security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 22 ++++++++- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++-- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 11 ++++- security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 12 ++--- security/integrity/integrity.h | 19 +++++++ 8 files changed, 209 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/digsig.c b/security/integrity/digsig.c index 37869214c243..1c353b1a6ec5 100644 --- a/security/integrity/digsig.c +++ b/security/integrity/digsig.c @@ -43,11 +43,10 @@ static const char * const keyring_name[INTEGRITY_KEYRING_MAX] = { #define restrict_link_to_ima restrict_link_by_builtin_trusted #endif -int integrity_digsig_verify(const unsigned int id, const char *sig, int siglen, - const char *digest, int digestlen) +static struct key *integrity_keyring_from_id(const unsigned int id) { - if (id >= INTEGRITY_KEYRING_MAX || siglen < 2) - return -EINVAL; + if (id >= INTEGRITY_KEYRING_MAX) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); if (!keyring[id]) { keyring[id] = @@ -56,23 +55,49 @@ int integrity_digsig_verify(const unsigned int id, const char *sig, int siglen, int err = PTR_ERR(keyring[id]); pr_err("no %s keyring: %d\n", keyring_name[id], err); keyring[id] = NULL; - return err; + return ERR_PTR(err); } } + return keyring[id]; +} + +int integrity_digsig_verify(const unsigned int id, const char *sig, int siglen, + const char *digest, int digestlen) +{ + struct key *keyring; + + if (siglen < 2) + return -EINVAL; + + keyring = integrity_keyring_from_id(id); + if (IS_ERR(keyring)) + return PTR_ERR(keyring); + switch (sig[1]) { case 1: /* v1 API expect signature without xattr type */ - return digsig_verify(keyring[id], sig + 1, siglen - 1, - digest, digestlen); + return digsig_verify(keyring, sig + 1, siglen - 1, digest, + digestlen); case 2: - return asymmetric_verify(keyring[id], sig, siglen, - digest, digestlen); + return asymmetric_verify(keyring, sig, siglen, digest, + digestlen); } return -EOPNOTSUPP; } +int integrity_modsig_verify(const unsigned int id, const struct modsig *modsig) +{ + struct key *keyring; + + keyring = integrity_keyring_from_id(id); + if (IS_ERR(keyring)) + return PTR_ERR(keyring); + + return ima_modsig_verify(keyring, modsig); +} + static int __init __integrity_init_keyring(const unsigned int id, key_perm_t perm, struct key_restriction *restriction) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig index 6fa78fbc8c30..5a109707e907 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig +++ b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig @@ -235,6 +235,9 @@ config IMA_APPRAISE_BOOTPARAM config IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG bool "Support module-style signatures for appraisal" depends on IMA_APPRAISE + depends on INTEGRITY_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS + select PKCS7_MESSAGE_PARSER + select MODULE_SIG_FORMAT default n help Adds support for signatures appended to files. The format of the diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index 904f7dd78007..fa188de1cef6 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -200,6 +200,10 @@ enum ima_hooks { __ima_hooks(__ima_hook_enumify) }; +extern const char *const func_tokens[]; + +struct modsig; + /* LIM API function definitions */ int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, int mask, enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr, @@ -253,7 +257,7 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value, - int xattr_len); + int xattr_len, const struct modsig *modsig); int ima_must_appraise(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func); void ima_update_xattr(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file); enum integrity_status ima_get_cache_status(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, @@ -269,7 +273,8 @@ static inline int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value, - int xattr_len) + int xattr_len, + const struct modsig *modsig) { return INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN; } @@ -308,11 +313,24 @@ static inline int ima_read_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG bool ima_hook_supports_modsig(enum ima_hooks func); +int ima_read_modsig(enum ima_hooks func, const void *buf, loff_t buf_len, + struct modsig **modsig); +void ima_free_modsig(struct modsig *modsig); #else static inline bool ima_hook_supports_modsig(enum ima_hooks func) { return false; } + +static inline int ima_read_modsig(enum ima_hooks func, const void *buf, + loff_t buf_len, struct modsig **modsig) +{ + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +} + +static inline void ima_free_modsig(struct modsig *modsig) +{ +} #endif /* CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG */ /* LSM based policy rules require audit */ diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 5d4772f39757..70252ac3321d 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -279,6 +279,33 @@ static int xattr_verify(enum ima_hooks func, struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, return rc; } +/* + * modsig_verify - verify modsig signature + * + * Verify whether the signature matches the file contents. + * + * Return 0 on success, error code otherwise. + */ +static int modsig_verify(enum ima_hooks func, const struct modsig *modsig, + enum integrity_status *status, const char **cause) +{ + int rc; + + rc = integrity_modsig_verify(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_IMA, modsig); + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING) && rc && + func == KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK) + rc = integrity_modsig_verify(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_PLATFORM, + modsig); + if (rc) { + *cause = "invalid-signature"; + *status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; + } else { + *status = INTEGRITY_PASS; + } + + return rc; +} + /* * ima_appraise_measurement - appraise file measurement * @@ -291,7 +318,7 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value, - int xattr_len) + int xattr_len, const struct modsig *modsig) { static const char op[] = "appraise_data"; const char *cause = "unknown"; @@ -299,11 +326,14 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry); enum integrity_status status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN; int rc = xattr_len; + bool try_modsig = iint->flags & IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED && modsig; - if (!(inode->i_opflags & IOP_XATTR)) + /* If not appraising a modsig, we need an xattr. */ + if (!(inode->i_opflags & IOP_XATTR) && !try_modsig) return INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN; - if (rc <= 0) { + /* If reading the xattr failed and there's no modsig, error out. */ + if (rc <= 0 && !try_modsig) { if (rc && rc != -ENODATA) goto out; @@ -326,6 +356,10 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, case INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN: break; case INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS: /* No EVM protected xattrs. */ + /* It's fine not to have xattrs when using a modsig. */ + if (try_modsig) + break; + /* fall through */ case INTEGRITY_NOLABEL: /* No security.evm xattr. */ cause = "missing-HMAC"; goto out; @@ -340,6 +374,15 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, rc = xattr_verify(func, iint, xattr_value, xattr_len, &status, &cause); + /* + * If we have a modsig and either no imasig or the imasig's key isn't + * known, then try verifying the modsig. + */ + if (try_modsig && + (!xattr_value || xattr_value->type == IMA_XATTR_DIGEST_NG || + rc == -ENOKEY)) + rc = modsig_verify(func, modsig, &status, &cause); + out: /* * File signatures on some filesystems can not be properly verified. @@ -356,7 +399,7 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, op, cause, rc, 0); } else if (status != INTEGRITY_PASS) { /* Fix mode, but don't replace file signatures. */ - if ((ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_FIX) && + if ((ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_FIX) && !try_modsig && (!xattr_value || xattr_value->type != EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG)) { if (!ima_fix_xattr(dentry, iint)) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index 317c4b6f2c18..309058c1d50e 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, int rc = 0, action, must_appraise = 0; int pcr = CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_PCR_IDX; struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value = NULL; + struct modsig *modsig = NULL; int xattr_len = 0; bool violation_check; enum hash_algo hash_algo; @@ -306,10 +307,15 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, } if ((action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK) || - strcmp(template_desc->name, IMA_TEMPLATE_IMA_NAME) != 0) + strcmp(template_desc->name, IMA_TEMPLATE_IMA_NAME) != 0) { /* read 'security.ima' */ xattr_len = ima_read_xattr(file_dentry(file), &xattr_value); + /* Read the appended modsig if allowed by the policy. */ + if (iint->flags & IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED) + ima_read_modsig(func, buf, size, &modsig); + } + hash_algo = ima_get_hash_algo(xattr_value, xattr_len); rc = ima_collect_measurement(iint, file, buf, size, hash_algo); @@ -326,7 +332,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, if (rc == 0 && (action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)) { inode_lock(inode); rc = ima_appraise_measurement(func, iint, file, pathname, - xattr_value, xattr_len); + xattr_value, xattr_len, modsig); inode_unlock(inode); if (!rc) rc = mmap_violation_check(func, file, &pathbuf, @@ -343,6 +349,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, rc = -EACCES; mutex_unlock(&iint->mutex); kfree(xattr_value); + ima_free_modsig(modsig); out: if (pathbuf) __putname(pathbuf); diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c index 87503bfe8c8b..f41ebe370fa0 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c @@ -8,8 +8,17 @@ * Thiago Jung Bauermann */ +#include +#include +#include +#include + #include "ima.h" +struct modsig { + struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7_msg; +}; + /** * ima_hook_supports_modsig - can the policy allow modsig for this hook? * @@ -29,3 +38,65 @@ bool ima_hook_supports_modsig(enum ima_hooks func) return false; } } + +/* + * ima_read_modsig - Read modsig from buf. + * + * Return: 0 on success, error code otherwise. + */ +int ima_read_modsig(enum ima_hooks func, const void *buf, loff_t buf_len, + struct modsig **modsig) +{ + const size_t marker_len = strlen(MODULE_SIG_STRING); + const struct module_signature *sig; + struct modsig *hdr; + size_t sig_len; + const void *p; + int rc; + + if (buf_len <= marker_len + sizeof(*sig)) + return -ENOENT; + + p = buf + buf_len - marker_len; + if (memcmp(p, MODULE_SIG_STRING, marker_len)) + return -ENOENT; + + buf_len -= marker_len; + sig = (const struct module_signature *)(p - sizeof(*sig)); + + rc = mod_check_sig(sig, buf_len, func_tokens[func]); + if (rc) + return rc; + + sig_len = be32_to_cpu(sig->sig_len); + buf_len -= sig_len + sizeof(*sig); + + hdr = kmalloc(sizeof(*hdr), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!hdr) + return -ENOMEM; + + hdr->pkcs7_msg = pkcs7_parse_message(buf + buf_len, sig_len); + if (IS_ERR(hdr->pkcs7_msg)) { + kfree(hdr); + return PTR_ERR(hdr->pkcs7_msg); + } + + *modsig = hdr; + + return 0; +} + +int ima_modsig_verify(struct key *keyring, const struct modsig *modsig) +{ + return verify_pkcs7_message_sig(NULL, 0, modsig->pkcs7_msg, keyring, + VERIFYING_MODULE_SIGNATURE, NULL, NULL); +} + +void ima_free_modsig(struct modsig *modsig) +{ + if (!modsig) + return; + + pkcs7_free_message(modsig->pkcs7_msg); + kfree(modsig); +} diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index ac258df2f1f4..4c5b968c4721 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -1260,6 +1260,12 @@ void ima_delete_rules(void) } } +#define __ima_hook_stringify(str) (#str), + +const char *const func_tokens[] = { + __ima_hooks(__ima_hook_stringify) +}; + #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY enum { mask_exec = 0, mask_write, mask_read, mask_append @@ -1272,12 +1278,6 @@ static const char *const mask_tokens[] = { "^MAY_APPEND" }; -#define __ima_hook_stringify(str) (#str), - -static const char *const func_tokens[] = { - __ima_hooks(__ima_hook_stringify) -}; - void *ima_policy_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos) { loff_t l = *pos; diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity.h b/security/integrity/integrity.h index 0e7330a36a9d..c6e7f41db470 100644 --- a/security/integrity/integrity.h +++ b/security/integrity/integrity.h @@ -153,10 +153,13 @@ int integrity_kernel_read(struct file *file, loff_t offset, extern struct dentry *integrity_dir; +struct modsig; + #ifdef CONFIG_INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE int integrity_digsig_verify(const unsigned int id, const char *sig, int siglen, const char *digest, int digestlen); +int integrity_modsig_verify(unsigned int id, const struct modsig *modsig); int __init integrity_init_keyring(const unsigned int id); int __init integrity_load_x509(const unsigned int id, const char *path); @@ -171,6 +174,12 @@ static inline int integrity_digsig_verify(const unsigned int id, return -EOPNOTSUPP; } +static inline int integrity_modsig_verify(unsigned int id, + const struct modsig *modsig) +{ + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +} + static inline int integrity_init_keyring(const unsigned int id) { return 0; @@ -196,6 +205,16 @@ static inline int asymmetric_verify(struct key *keyring, const char *sig, } #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG +int ima_modsig_verify(struct key *keyring, const struct modsig *modsig); +#else +static inline int ima_modsig_verify(struct key *keyring, + const struct modsig *modsig) +{ + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +} +#endif + #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_LOAD_X509 void __init ima_load_x509(void); #else From patchwork Fri Jun 28 02:19:31 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thiago Jung Bauermann X-Patchwork-Id: 11021103 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CBE76 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C398828564 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id B42F2285F0; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBE928564 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726523AbfF1CUe (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:34 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:7722 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726836AbfF1CUb (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:31 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2HJfK084759 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:30 -0400 Received: from e11.ny.us.ibm.com (e11.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.201]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td76adww9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:30 -0400 Received: from localhost by e11.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 03:20:29 +0100 Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.27) by e11.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.198) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 28 Jun 2019 03:20:24 +0100 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5S2KNev39584052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:23 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B573112063; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97AE3112062; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from morokweng.localdomain.com (unknown [9.85.218.134]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:19 +0000 (GMT) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , David Howells , David Woodhouse , Jessica Yu , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , Thiago Jung Bauermann Subject: [PATCH v12 08/11] ima: Collect modsig Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:19:31 -0300 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19062802-2213-0000-0000-000003A60F4A X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00011344; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000286; SDB=6.01224269; UDB=6.00644348; IPR=6.01005460; MB=3.00027497; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-06-28 02:20:28 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19062802-2214-0000-0000-00005F061068 Message-Id: <20190628021934.4260-9-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-27_15:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=3 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906280019 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Obtain the modsig and calculate its corresponding hash in ima_collect_measurement(). Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann --- security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 8 ++++- security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 5 ++- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 2 +- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +- security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 5 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index fa188de1cef6..baf2ffd52a41 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, int ima_must_measure(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func); int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size, - enum hash_algo algo); + enum hash_algo algo, struct modsig *modsig); void ima_store_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value, @@ -315,6 +315,7 @@ static inline int ima_read_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, bool ima_hook_supports_modsig(enum ima_hooks func); int ima_read_modsig(enum ima_hooks func, const void *buf, loff_t buf_len, struct modsig **modsig); +void ima_collect_modsig(struct modsig *modsig, const void *buf, loff_t size); void ima_free_modsig(struct modsig *modsig); #else static inline bool ima_hook_supports_modsig(enum ima_hooks func) @@ -328,6 +329,11 @@ static inline int ima_read_modsig(enum ima_hooks func, const void *buf, return -EOPNOTSUPP; } +static inline void ima_collect_modsig(struct modsig *modsig, const void *buf, + loff_t size) +{ +} + static inline void ima_free_modsig(struct modsig *modsig) { } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c index d426d4d1fe04..ac35bc3d6e35 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, */ int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size, - enum hash_algo algo) + enum hash_algo algo, struct modsig *modsig) { const char *audit_cause = "failed"; struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); @@ -256,6 +256,9 @@ int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, memcpy(iint->ima_hash, &hash, length); iint->version = i_version; + if (modsig) + ima_collect_modsig(modsig, buf, size); + /* Possibly temporary failure due to type of read (eg. O_DIRECT) */ if (!result) iint->flags |= IMA_COLLECTED; diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 70252ac3321d..aa14e3fe25d5 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ void ima_update_xattr(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file) !(iint->flags & IMA_HASH)) return; - rc = ima_collect_measurement(iint, file, NULL, 0, ima_hash_algo); + rc = ima_collect_measurement(iint, file, NULL, 0, ima_hash_algo, NULL); if (rc < 0) return; diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index 309058c1d50e..cc4500f93408 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, hash_algo = ima_get_hash_algo(xattr_value, xattr_len); - rc = ima_collect_measurement(iint, file, buf, size, hash_algo); + rc = ima_collect_measurement(iint, file, buf, size, hash_algo, modsig); if (rc != 0 && rc != -EBADF && rc != -EINVAL) goto out_locked; diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c index f41ebe370fa0..d438b87dba89 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c @@ -17,6 +17,19 @@ struct modsig { struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7_msg; + + enum hash_algo hash_algo; + + /* This digest will go in the 'd-modsig' field of the IMA template. */ + const u8 *digest; + u32 digest_size; + + /* + * This is what will go to the measurement list if the template requires + * storing the signature. + */ + int raw_pkcs7_len; + u8 raw_pkcs7[]; }; /** @@ -71,7 +84,8 @@ int ima_read_modsig(enum ima_hooks func, const void *buf, loff_t buf_len, sig_len = be32_to_cpu(sig->sig_len); buf_len -= sig_len + sizeof(*sig); - hdr = kmalloc(sizeof(*hdr), GFP_KERNEL); + /* Allocate sig_len additional bytes to hold the raw PKCS#7 data. */ + hdr = kzalloc(sizeof(*hdr) + sig_len, GFP_KERNEL); if (!hdr) return -ENOMEM; @@ -81,11 +95,45 @@ int ima_read_modsig(enum ima_hooks func, const void *buf, loff_t buf_len, return PTR_ERR(hdr->pkcs7_msg); } + memcpy(hdr->raw_pkcs7, buf + buf_len, sig_len); + hdr->raw_pkcs7_len = sig_len; + + /* We don't know the hash algorithm yet. */ + hdr->hash_algo = HASH_ALGO__LAST; + *modsig = hdr; return 0; } +/** + * ima_collect_modsig - Calculate the file hash without the appended signature. + * + * Since the modsig is part of the file contents, the hash used in its signature + * isn't the same one ordinarily calculated by IMA. Therefore PKCS7 code + * calculates a separate one for signature verification. + */ +void ima_collect_modsig(struct modsig *modsig, const void *buf, loff_t size) +{ + int rc; + + /* + * Provide the file contents (minus the appended sig) so that the PKCS7 + * code can calculate the file hash. + */ + size -= modsig->raw_pkcs7_len + strlen(MODULE_SIG_STRING) + + sizeof(struct module_signature); + rc = pkcs7_supply_detached_data(modsig->pkcs7_msg, buf, size); + if (rc) + return; + + /* Ask the PKCS7 code to calculate the file hash. */ + rc = pkcs7_get_digest(modsig->pkcs7_msg, &modsig->digest, + &modsig->digest_size, &modsig->hash_algo); + if (rc) + return; +} + int ima_modsig_verify(struct key *keyring, const struct modsig *modsig) { return verify_pkcs7_message_sig(NULL, 0, modsig->pkcs7_msg, keyring, From patchwork Fri Jun 28 02:19:32 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thiago Jung Bauermann X-Patchwork-Id: 11021131 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A5876 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C472874E for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 97A782877B; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD182874C for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726977AbfF1CU4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:56 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:49350 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726895AbfF1CUy (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:54 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2GXt5013677; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:30 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td86gur2f-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:29 -0400 Received: from m0098419.ppops.net (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2Hc68015982; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:29 -0400 Received: from ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (83.d6.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.214.131]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td86gur25-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:29 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2JYlk031936; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:28 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.24]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2t9by7jp2v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:28 +0000 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5S2KRtQ42205670 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:27 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B63B112061; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9862112065; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from morokweng.localdomain.com (unknown [9.85.218.134]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:23 +0000 (GMT) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , David Howells , David Woodhouse , Jessica Yu , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , Thiago Jung Bauermann Subject: [PATCH v12 09/11] ima: Define ima-modsig template Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:19:32 -0300 Message-Id: <20190628021934.4260-10-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-27_15:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=3 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906280019 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Define new "d-modsig" template field which holds the digest that is expected to match the one contained in the modsig, and also new "modsig" template field which holds the appended file signature. Add a new "ima-modsig" defined template descriptor with the new fields as well as the ones from the "ima-sig" descriptor. Change ima_store_measurement() to accept a struct modsig * argument so that it can be passed along to the templates via struct ima_event_data. Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar --- Documentation/security/IMA-templates.rst | 3 ++ security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 20 ++++++- security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 5 +- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +- security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c | 19 +++++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 41 +++++++++++++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c | 7 ++- security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++- security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.h | 4 ++ 9 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/security/IMA-templates.rst b/Documentation/security/IMA-templates.rst index 3d1cca287aa4..c5a8432972ef 100644 --- a/Documentation/security/IMA-templates.rst +++ b/Documentation/security/IMA-templates.rst @@ -68,8 +68,10 @@ descriptors by adding their identifier to the format string - 'd-ng': the digest of the event, calculated with an arbitrary hash algorithm (field format: [:]digest, where the digest prefix is shown only if the hash algorithm is not SHA1 or MD5); + - 'd-modsig': the digest of the event without the appended modsig; - 'n-ng': the name of the event, without size limitations; - 'sig': the file signature; + - 'modsig' the appended file signature; - 'buf': the buffer data that was used to generate the hash without size limitations; @@ -79,6 +81,7 @@ Below, there is the list of defined template descriptors: - "ima-ng" (default): its format is ``d-ng|n-ng``; - "ima-sig": its format is ``d-ng|n-ng|sig``; - "ima-buf": its format is ``d-ng|n-ng|buf``; + - "ima-modsig": its format is ``d-ng|n-ng|sig|d-modsig|modsig``; Use diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index baf2ffd52a41..3293dd07b6c9 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ struct ima_event_data { const unsigned char *filename; struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value; int xattr_len; + const struct modsig *modsig; const char *violation; const void *buf; int buf_len; @@ -215,7 +216,7 @@ int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, void ima_store_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value, - int xattr_len, int pcr, + int xattr_len, const struct modsig *modsig, int pcr, struct ima_template_desc *template_desc); void ima_audit_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, const unsigned char *filename); @@ -316,6 +317,10 @@ bool ima_hook_supports_modsig(enum ima_hooks func); int ima_read_modsig(enum ima_hooks func, const void *buf, loff_t buf_len, struct modsig **modsig); void ima_collect_modsig(struct modsig *modsig, const void *buf, loff_t size); +int ima_get_modsig_digest(const struct modsig *modsig, enum hash_algo *algo, + const u8 **digest, u32 *digest_size); +int ima_get_raw_modsig(const struct modsig *modsig, const void **data, + u32 *data_len); void ima_free_modsig(struct modsig *modsig); #else static inline bool ima_hook_supports_modsig(enum ima_hooks func) @@ -334,6 +339,19 @@ static inline void ima_collect_modsig(struct modsig *modsig, const void *buf, { } +static inline int ima_get_modsig_digest(const struct modsig *modsig, + enum hash_algo *algo, const u8 **digest, + u32 *digest_size) +{ + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +} + +static inline int ima_get_raw_modsig(const struct modsig *modsig, + const void **data, u32 *data_len) +{ + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +} + static inline void ima_free_modsig(struct modsig *modsig) { } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c index ac35bc3d6e35..9d1fe712a6cc 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, void ima_store_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value, - int xattr_len, int pcr, + int xattr_len, const struct modsig *modsig, int pcr, struct ima_template_desc *template_desc) { static const char op[] = "add_template_measure"; @@ -304,7 +304,8 @@ void ima_store_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, .file = file, .filename = filename, .xattr_value = xattr_value, - .xattr_len = xattr_len }; + .xattr_len = xattr_len, + .modsig = modsig }; int violation = 0; if (iint->measured_pcrs & (0x1 << pcr)) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index cc4500f93408..8b35a200e0cc 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, if (action & IMA_MEASURE) ima_store_measurement(iint, file, pathname, - xattr_value, xattr_len, pcr, + xattr_value, xattr_len, modsig, pcr, template_desc); if (rc == 0 && (action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)) { inode_lock(inode); diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c index d438b87dba89..b01bbfeb1d98 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c @@ -140,6 +140,25 @@ int ima_modsig_verify(struct key *keyring, const struct modsig *modsig) VERIFYING_MODULE_SIGNATURE, NULL, NULL); } +int ima_get_modsig_digest(const struct modsig *modsig, enum hash_algo *algo, + const u8 **digest, u32 *digest_size) +{ + *algo = modsig->hash_algo; + *digest = modsig->digest; + *digest_size = modsig->digest_size; + + return 0; +} + +int ima_get_raw_modsig(const struct modsig *modsig, const void **data, + u32 *data_len) +{ + *data = &modsig->raw_pkcs7; + *data_len = modsig->raw_pkcs7_len; + + return 0; +} + void ima_free_modsig(struct modsig *modsig) { if (!modsig) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 4c5b968c4721..4fc13e591f1d 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ * - initialize default measure policy rules * */ + +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt + #include #include #include @@ -847,6 +850,38 @@ static void ima_log_string(struct audit_buffer *ab, char *key, char *value) ima_log_string_op(ab, key, value, NULL); } +/* + * Validating the appended signature included in the measurement list requires + * the file hash calculated without the appended signature (i.e., the 'd-modsig' + * field). Therefore, notify the user if they have the 'modsig' field but not + * the 'd-modsig' field in the template. + */ +static void check_template_modsig(const struct ima_template_desc *template) +{ +#define MSG "template with 'modsig' field also needs 'd-modsig' field\n" + bool has_modsig, has_dmodsig; + static bool checked; + int i; + + /* We only need to notify the user once. */ + if (checked) + return; + + has_modsig = has_dmodsig = false; + for (i = 0; i < template->num_fields; i++) { + if (!strcmp(template->fields[i]->field_id, "modsig")) + has_modsig = true; + else if (!strcmp(template->fields[i]->field_id, "d-modsig")) + has_dmodsig = true; + } + + if (has_modsig && !has_dmodsig) + pr_notice(MSG); + + checked = true; +#undef MSG +} + static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) { struct audit_buffer *ab; @@ -1189,6 +1224,12 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) else if (entry->action == APPRAISE) temp_ima_appraise |= ima_appraise_flag(entry->func); + if (!result && entry->flags & IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED) { + template_desc = entry->template ? entry->template : + ima_template_desc_current(); + check_template_modsig(template_desc); + } + audit_log_format(ab, "res=%d", !result); audit_log_end(ab); return result; diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c index 7343e8e0ae2f..ac526b34973f 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ static struct ima_template_desc builtin_templates[] = { {.name = "ima-ng", .fmt = "d-ng|n-ng"}, {.name = "ima-sig", .fmt = "d-ng|n-ng|sig"}, {.name = "ima-buf", .fmt = "d-ng|n-ng|buf"}, + {.name = "ima-modsig", .fmt = "d-ng|n-ng|sig|d-modsig|modsig"}, {.name = "", .fmt = ""}, /* placeholder for a custom format */ }; @@ -46,6 +47,10 @@ static const struct ima_template_field supported_fields[] = { .field_show = ima_show_template_sig}, {.field_id = "buf", .field_init = ima_eventbuf_init, .field_show = ima_show_template_buf}, + {.field_id = "d-modsig", .field_init = ima_eventdigest_modsig_init, + .field_show = ima_show_template_digest_ng}, + {.field_id = "modsig", .field_init = ima_eventmodsig_init, + .field_show = ima_show_template_sig}, }; /* @@ -53,7 +58,7 @@ static const struct ima_template_field supported_fields[] = { * need to be accounted for since they shouldn't be defined in the same template * description as 'd-ng' and 'n-ng' respectively. */ -#define MAX_TEMPLATE_NAME_LEN sizeof("d-ng|n-ng|sig|buf") +#define MAX_TEMPLATE_NAME_LEN sizeof("d-ng|n-ng|sig|buf|d-modisg|modsig") static struct ima_template_desc *ima_template; diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c index baf4de45c5aa..22e71cd5ca02 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c @@ -229,7 +229,8 @@ int ima_parse_buf(void *bufstartp, void *bufendp, void **bufcurp, return 0; } -static int ima_eventdigest_init_common(u8 *digest, u32 digestsize, u8 hash_algo, +static int ima_eventdigest_init_common(const u8 *digest, u32 digestsize, + u8 hash_algo, struct ima_field_data *field_data) { /* @@ -332,6 +333,41 @@ int ima_eventdigest_ng_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, hash_algo, field_data); } +/* + * This function writes the digest of the file which is expected to match the + * digest contained in the file's appended signature. + */ +int ima_eventdigest_modsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, + struct ima_field_data *field_data) +{ + enum hash_algo hash_algo; + const u8 *cur_digest; + u32 cur_digestsize; + + if (!event_data->modsig) + return 0; + + if (event_data->violation) { + /* Recording a violation. */ + hash_algo = HASH_ALGO_SHA1; + cur_digest = NULL; + cur_digestsize = 0; + } else { + int rc; + + rc = ima_get_modsig_digest(event_data->modsig, &hash_algo, + &cur_digest, &cur_digestsize); + if (rc) + return rc; + else if (hash_algo == HASH_ALGO__LAST || cur_digestsize == 0) + /* There was some error collecting the digest. */ + return -EINVAL; + } + + return ima_eventdigest_init_common(cur_digest, cur_digestsize, + hash_algo, field_data); +} + static int ima_eventname_init_common(struct ima_event_data *event_data, struct ima_field_data *field_data, bool size_limit) @@ -410,3 +446,29 @@ int ima_eventbuf_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, event_data->buf_len, DATA_FMT_HEX, field_data); } + +/* + * ima_eventmodsig_init - include the appended file signature as part of the + * template data + */ +int ima_eventmodsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, + struct ima_field_data *field_data) +{ + const void *data; + u32 data_len; + int rc; + + if (!event_data->modsig) + return 0; + + /* + * modsig is a runtime structure containing pointers. Get its raw data + * instead. + */ + rc = ima_get_raw_modsig(event_data->modsig, &data, &data_len); + if (rc) + return rc; + + return ima_write_template_field_data(data, data_len, DATA_FMT_HEX, + field_data); +} diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.h index 12f1a8578b31..6544eac1c77d 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.h @@ -40,10 +40,14 @@ int ima_eventname_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, struct ima_field_data *field_data); int ima_eventdigest_ng_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, struct ima_field_data *field_data); +int ima_eventdigest_modsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, + struct ima_field_data *field_data); int ima_eventname_ng_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, struct ima_field_data *field_data); int ima_eventsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, struct ima_field_data *field_data); int ima_eventbuf_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, struct ima_field_data *field_data); +int ima_eventmodsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, + struct ima_field_data *field_data); #endif /* __LINUX_IMA_TEMPLATE_LIB_H */ From patchwork Fri Jun 28 02:19:33 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thiago Jung Bauermann X-Patchwork-Id: 11021137 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3F076 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2F428748 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id B305E2874C; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9F22874E for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726887AbfF1CUm (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:42 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:32738 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726827AbfF1CUi (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:38 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2GY7J023920 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:37 -0400 Received: from e11.ny.us.ibm.com (e11.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.201]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td695yrkx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:37 -0400 Received: from localhost by e11.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 03:20:36 +0100 Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.28) by e11.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.198) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 28 Jun 2019 03:20:32 +0100 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5S2KVww23790076 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:31 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9327D112062; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D26112061; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from morokweng.localdomain.com (unknown [9.85.218.134]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:27 +0000 (GMT) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , David Howells , David Woodhouse , Jessica Yu , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , Thiago Jung Bauermann Subject: [PATCH v12 10/11] ima: Store the measurement again when appraising a modsig Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:19:33 -0300 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19062802-2213-0000-0000-000003A60F53 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00011344; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000286; SDB=6.01224269; UDB=6.00644348; IPR=6.01005460; MB=3.00027497; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-06-28 02:20:36 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19062802-2214-0000-0000-00005F061081 Message-Id: <20190628021934.4260-11-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-27_15:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906280019 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP If the IMA template contains the "modsig" or "d-modsig" field, then the modsig should be added to the measurement list when the file is appraised. And that is what normally happens, but if a measurement rule caused a file containing a modsig to be measured before a different rule causes it to be appraised, the resulting measurement entry will not contain the modsig because it is only fetched during appraisal. When the appraisal rule triggers, it won't store a new measurement containing the modsig because the file was already measured. We need to detect that situation and store an additional measurement with the modsig. This is done by adding an IMA_MEASURE action flag if we read a modsig and the IMA template contains a modsig field. Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann --- security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 1 + security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 19 +++++++++++++++---- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index 3293dd07b6c9..01a7a140bb4a 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ int template_desc_init_fields(const char *template_fmt, int *num_fields); struct ima_template_desc *ima_template_desc_current(void); struct ima_template_desc *lookup_template_desc(const char *name); +bool ima_template_has_modsig(const struct ima_template_desc *ima_template); int ima_restore_measurement_entry(struct ima_template_entry *entry); int ima_restore_measurement_list(loff_t bufsize, void *buf); int ima_measurements_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v); diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c index 9d1fe712a6cc..3a78373d835c 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c @@ -223,6 +223,14 @@ int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, char digest[IMA_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE]; } hash; + /* + * Always collect the modsig, because IMA might have already collected + * the file digest without collecting the modsig in a previous + * measurement rule. + */ + if (modsig) + ima_collect_modsig(modsig, buf, size); + if (iint->flags & IMA_COLLECTED) goto out; @@ -256,9 +264,6 @@ int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, memcpy(iint->ima_hash, &hash, length); iint->version = i_version; - if (modsig) - ima_collect_modsig(modsig, buf, size); - /* Possibly temporary failure due to type of read (eg. O_DIRECT) */ if (!result) iint->flags |= IMA_COLLECTED; @@ -308,7 +313,13 @@ void ima_store_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, .modsig = modsig }; int violation = 0; - if (iint->measured_pcrs & (0x1 << pcr)) + /* + * We still need to store the measurement in the case of MODSIG because + * we only have its contents to put in the list at the time of + * appraisal, but a file measurement from earlier might already exist in + * the measurement list. + */ + if (iint->measured_pcrs & (0x1 << pcr) && !modsig) return; result = ima_alloc_init_template(&event_data, &entry, template_desc); diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index 8b35a200e0cc..e855a4658425 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -311,9 +311,18 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, /* read 'security.ima' */ xattr_len = ima_read_xattr(file_dentry(file), &xattr_value); - /* Read the appended modsig if allowed by the policy. */ - if (iint->flags & IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED) - ima_read_modsig(func, buf, size, &modsig); + /* + * Read the appended modsig if allowed by the policy, and allow + * an additional measurement list entry, if needed, based on the + * template format and whether the file was already measured. + */ + if (iint->flags & IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED) { + rc = ima_read_modsig(func, buf, size, &modsig); + + if (!rc && ima_template_has_modsig(template_desc) && + iint->flags & IMA_MEASURED) + action |= IMA_MEASURE; + } } hash_algo = ima_get_hash_algo(xattr_value, xattr_len); diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c index ac526b34973f..536205735456 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c @@ -62,6 +62,25 @@ static const struct ima_template_field supported_fields[] = { static struct ima_template_desc *ima_template; +/** + * ima_template_has_modsig - Check whether template has modsig-related fields. + * @ima_template: IMA template to check. + * + * Tells whether the given template has fields referencing a file's appended + * signature. + */ +bool ima_template_has_modsig(const struct ima_template_desc *ima_template) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ima_template->num_fields; i++) + if (!strcmp(ima_template->fields[i]->field_id, "modsig") || + !strcmp(ima_template->fields[i]->field_id, "d-modsig")) + return true; + + return false; +} + static int __init ima_template_setup(char *str) { struct ima_template_desc *template_desc; From patchwork Fri Jun 28 02:19:34 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thiago Jung Bauermann X-Patchwork-Id: 11021121 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D335A76 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C680F285CC for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id BA3E0285F0; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8F228564 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726498AbfF1CUs (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:48 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:1426 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726898AbfF1CUn (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:43 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2GYMx129295 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:42 -0400 Received: from e11.ny.us.ibm.com (e11.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.201]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td9x4g7ap-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:42 -0400 Received: from localhost by e11.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 03:20:40 +0100 Received: from b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.25) by e11.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.198) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 28 Jun 2019 03:20:36 +0100 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5S2KZgn53936570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:35 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354D4112065; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A76112061; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from morokweng.localdomain.com (unknown [9.85.218.134]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:31 +0000 (GMT) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , David Howells , David Woodhouse , Jessica Yu , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , Thiago Jung Bauermann Subject: [PATCH v12 11/11] ima: Allow template= option for appraise rules as well Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:19:34 -0300 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19062802-2213-0000-0000-000003A60F54 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00011344; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000286; SDB=6.01224269; UDB=6.00644348; IPR=6.01005460; MB=3.00027497; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-06-28 02:20:40 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19062802-2214-0000-0000-00005F06108E Message-Id: <20190628021934.4260-12-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-27_15:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=881 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906280019 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP It's useful being able to specify a different IMA template on appraise policy rules, so allow it. Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 4fc13e591f1d..46ed31a0adfe 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -1193,7 +1193,8 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) break; case Opt_template: ima_log_string(ab, "template", args[0].from); - if (entry->action != MEASURE) { + if (entry->action != MEASURE && + entry->action != APPRAISE) { result = -EINVAL; break; }