From patchwork Sat Aug 17 05:32:40 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zhang Xiaoxu X-Patchwork-Id: 11098551 X-Patchwork-Delegate: snitzer@redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83C214F7 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 05:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA9728A7D for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 05:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id BC38628A9C; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 05:26:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6C4E28A7D for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 05:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 196A2C057F2C; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 05:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB41719C6A; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 05:26:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CD04A486; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 05:26:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x7H5QaKQ024186 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 01:26:36 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 798C2646B7; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 05:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: dm-devel@redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C33B084625; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 05:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from huawei.com (szxga06-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86B3686663; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 05:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id B753E7A753B45596DE92; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 13:26:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from RH5885H-V3.huawei.com (10.90.53.225) by DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 13:26:14 +0800 From: ZhangXiaoxu To: , , , Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 13:32:40 +0800 Message-ID: <1566019960-24788-1-git-send-email-zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.90.53.225] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, Sender IP whitelisted by DNSRBL, ACL 238 matched, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Sat, 17 Aug 2019 05:26:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Sat, 17 Aug 2019 05:26:27 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'45.249.212.32' DOMAIN:'szxga06-in.huawei.com' HELO:'huawei.com' FROM:'zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com' RCPT:'' X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -2.302 (RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS) 45.249.212.32 szxga06-in.huawei.com 45.249.212.32 szxga06-in.huawei.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.5.110.26 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-loop: dm-devel@redhat.com Subject: [dm-devel] [PATCH] dm-btree: Fix the order of the block initialized on btree_split_beneath X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Sat, 17 Aug 2019 05:26:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP When splits a node to two new children, it will new two blocks: left and right. If new right block failed, the left block will be unlocked and mark it dirty. If this happened, the left blocks content is zero, it won't be initialized with the btree struct. When flush the left block to disk, the validator will failed when check this block. Then BUG_ON will raised. So, let's initialize the left block before new right block. Signed-off-by: ZhangXiaoxu --- drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree.c b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree.c index 58b3197..8aae062 100644 --- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree.c +++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree.c @@ -628,39 +628,40 @@ static int btree_split_beneath(struct shadow_spine *s, uint64_t key) new_parent = shadow_current(s); + pn = dm_block_data(new_parent); + size = le32_to_cpu(pn->header.flags) & INTERNAL_NODE ? + sizeof(__le64) : s->info->value_type.size; + + /* create & init the left block */ r = new_block(s->info, &left); if (r < 0) return r; + ln = dm_block_data(left); + nr_left = le32_to_cpu(pn->header.nr_entries) / 2; + + ln->header.flags = pn->header.flags; + ln->header.nr_entries = cpu_to_le32(nr_left); + ln->header.max_entries = pn->header.max_entries; + ln->header.value_size = pn->header.value_size; + memcpy(ln->keys, pn->keys, nr_left * sizeof(pn->keys[0])); + memcpy(value_ptr(ln, 0), value_ptr(pn, 0), nr_left * size); + + /* create & init the right block */ r = new_block(s->info, &right); if (r < 0) { unlock_block(s->info, left); return r; } - pn = dm_block_data(new_parent); - ln = dm_block_data(left); rn = dm_block_data(right); - - nr_left = le32_to_cpu(pn->header.nr_entries) / 2; nr_right = le32_to_cpu(pn->header.nr_entries) - nr_left; - ln->header.flags = pn->header.flags; - ln->header.nr_entries = cpu_to_le32(nr_left); - ln->header.max_entries = pn->header.max_entries; - ln->header.value_size = pn->header.value_size; - rn->header.flags = pn->header.flags; rn->header.nr_entries = cpu_to_le32(nr_right); rn->header.max_entries = pn->header.max_entries; rn->header.value_size = pn->header.value_size; - - memcpy(ln->keys, pn->keys, nr_left * sizeof(pn->keys[0])); memcpy(rn->keys, pn->keys + nr_left, nr_right * sizeof(pn->keys[0])); - - size = le32_to_cpu(pn->header.flags) & INTERNAL_NODE ? - sizeof(__le64) : s->info->value_type.size; - memcpy(value_ptr(ln, 0), value_ptr(pn, 0), nr_left * size); memcpy(value_ptr(rn, 0), value_ptr(pn, nr_left), nr_right * size);