From patchwork Wed Oct 23 15:01:02 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ian Jackson X-Patchwork-Id: 11206989 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707121747 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 15:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C83A21920 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 15:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=citrix.com header.i=@citrix.com header.b="V8nYdlu2" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4C83A21920 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=eu.citrix.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iNI8N-0004Q6-QP; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 15:01:11 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iNI8M-0004Pz-61 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 15:01:10 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: f1de8ff0-f5a5-11e9-beca-bc764e2007e4 Received: from esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (unknown [216.71.155.168]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id f1de8ff0-f5a5-11e9-beca-bc764e2007e4; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 15:01:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=citrix.com; s=securemail; t=1571842869; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=5Z9Rg+9DW25A8Lsd1gVrSb8xdcEurfG6Z5IOqj60xLg=; b=V8nYdlu2pu1mINXr0EUdSKOOmWIKt12vOMsVukzYfEjsaC8oaklzKOns 0zN4ajPMbApRuWnVwKGrlM+4jAGyw5HwchSvCAT0t+7lmqJoCaB1/t89a ARJUGgm4Ikig1M2NW0iXqPWez4wlh7lkPvgASabSWsTLHNq7/1u7y/z7h o=; Authentication-Results: esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=None smtp.pra=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=Ian.Jackson@citrix.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail.citrix.com Received-SPF: None (esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com) identity=pra; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Ian.Jackson@citrix.com"; x-sender="ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: domain of Ian.Jackson@citrix.com designates 162.221.158.21 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Ian.Jackson@citrix.com"; x-sender="Ian.Jackson@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 ip4:209.167.231.154 ip4:178.63.86.133 ip4:195.66.111.40/30 ip4:85.115.9.32/28 ip4:199.102.83.4 ip4:192.28.146.160 ip4:192.28.146.107 ip4:216.52.6.88 ip4:216.52.6.188 ip4:162.221.158.21 ip4:162.221.156.83 ip4:168.245.78.127 ~all" Received-SPF: None (esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail.citrix.com) identity=helo; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Ian.Jackson@citrix.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail.citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible IronPort-SDR: XL/PvaHD323arMTvefHcbNxadE8Dt2+UIKXHH0Vt/YOuL5ZduTAzMeqq1qEyGSZtGRA1ucxitW EXwiLQOSrVZ5J6W9oNfzPAUL0ONsWTk9m/2DZsk4qdnyf3Dlqcp2aJsLjVIDGun4MiR+1/1+Fz NU6fB7WOMGsbEyyrIK/WRL4pGqQ88IOknRlb82npF3wB8GRD1nTHfdB681oRzPVTtt4Sh7/9MJ crsSVrgZ8jlh4rX594P+yJ0M86zB1eYsbbkG6kV3s0Qmt7L9V3eFfg6NArMPnxowZTWvFtBnKD npc= X-SBRS: 2.7 X-MesageID: 7633026 X-Ironport-Server: esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,221,1569297600"; d="scan'208";a="7633026" From: Ian Jackson To: Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:01:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20191023150103.31562-1-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 1/2] make-flight: Rework arch_branch_filter_callback slightly X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ian Jackson Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" Now we have two lists of things not supported on ARM: one of branches where that's inherent in the branch somehow, and one for those where the kernel is simply too old. The latter are going to differ between armhf and arm64. No functional change. (Verified with standalone-generate-dump-flight-runvars.) Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson --- make-flight | 7 ++++++- mfi-common | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/make-flight b/make-flight index 020ad5f1..f90fe77c 100755 --- a/make-flight +++ b/make-flight @@ -189,8 +189,13 @@ arch_branch_filter_callback () { linux-3.4) return 1;; linux-3.10) return 1;; linux-3.14) return 1;; + esac + ;; + esac + case "$arch" in + arm*) + case "$branch" in linux-mingo-tip-master) return 1;; - linux-*) ;; qemu-upstream-4.2-testing) return 1;; qemu-upstream-4.3-testing) return 1;; qemu-upstream-4.4-testing) return 1;; diff --git a/mfi-common b/mfi-common index 7c03ffd4..b40f057e 100644 --- a/mfi-common +++ b/mfi-common @@ -288,6 +288,10 @@ create_build_jobs () { " ;; arm64) + case "$branch" in + linux-3.*-testing) continue;; + linux-4.[0-4]-testing) continue;; + esac case "$xenbranch" in xen-3.*-testing) continue;; xen-4.[0-6]-testing) continue;;